This is funny because very patriotic fraternity men are fond of semi-jokingly referring to the United States of America as the “champions” of World Wars I and II, due to its position on the winning side of both conflicts and its significant contributions to the eventual Allied victory. The designation of America as “back to back” champions is an analogy to that of a dynastic sports team which has won two world championships in consecutive seasons.
The poster is implying that he frequently employs this analogy as an effective trump card in ending debates with non-Americans over various comparisons between the United States and the rest of the world (such as the relative quality of a nation’s domestic social programs, human development indices, cultural contributions, etc) in which the United States arguably does not reign supreme internationally. Mentioning the United States’ contribution to the Allied war effort in World Wars I and II serves as an effective method of one-upmanship by minimizing the significance of any potential area of American national weakness through reminding his opponent of America’s unparalleled military supremacy since the 20th century.
Nobody enjoys talking to you.
9 years ago at 10:13 amMy high school frat cock was back to back champs in your girls mouth.
9 years ago at 10:16 amYou’re not welcome here.
9 years ago at 11:17 amCan we blackball him yet?
9 years ago at 8:35 pmTry harder. You can’t.
9 years ago at 10:17 amWow you’re a rowdy gentleman!!!
9 years ago at 11:03 amThis is funny because very patriotic fraternity men are fond of semi-jokingly referring to the United States of America as the “champions” of World Wars I and II, due to its position on the winning side of both conflicts and its significant contributions to the eventual Allied victory. The designation of America as “back to back” champions is an analogy to that of a dynastic sports team which has won two world championships in consecutive seasons.
The poster is implying that he frequently employs this analogy as an effective trump card in ending debates with non-Americans over various comparisons between the United States and the rest of the world (such as the relative quality of a nation’s domestic social programs, human development indices, cultural contributions, etc) in which the United States arguably does not reign supreme internationally. Mentioning the United States’ contribution to the Allied war effort in World Wars I and II serves as an effective method of one-upmanship by minimizing the significance of any potential area of American national weakness through reminding his opponent of America’s unparalleled military supremacy since the 20th century.
9 years ago at 5:56 pmthis is my new favorite account by a long shot
9 years ago at 10:47 am