Campus Tobacco Bans Are Un-American

Screen Shot 2015-07-21 at 4.54.18 PM copy

You trudge through the exit of the campus library after spending the entire night glued to a computer screen, cranking out a last minute, 20-page essay on the harmful effects of trigger warnings for your bullshit media ethics class. With the lingering pep of an extended release Adderall waning in your bloodstream, your brain tells you to reach into your pocket and pull out a pack of Camel Filters. Not only do you deserve to satiate your study drug-enhanced nicotine craving – you need to. But when you put the filter to your lips and spark up, someone coughs loudly in your direction. You look over to see a rotund girl in a “Healthy [insert school here]” t-shirt hunched over a balanced breakfast of Chick-Fil-A biscuit sandwiches and hash browns. She coughs at you again. Then, she motions towards a nearby “Tobacco Free Campus” sign.

You take a drag and continue to walk, pretending you didn’t see her. But she’s on a mission, driven by a newfound sense of authority harbored after heading a student-led charge to ban tobacco products from campus. She approaches you, presses one of her sausage fingers to your chest, and reminds you of the campus-wide ban.

Not wanting to make a scene, you extinguish the cigarette on the bottom of your shoe, tuck it in the pack, and relight it when out of her sight. But smokers shouldn’t have to look over their shoulders to enjoy their nicotine fixes. In fact, it’s downright un-American.

The trend of banning tobacco on college campuses is sweeping the nation. As of July 1, over 1,070 universities have implemented 100% smoke-free campuses. Two-thirds of those schools are 100% tobacco free. The number of campuses supporting the policy has doubled since 2012 when the Tobacco Free College Initiative was launched.

Punitive action for being caught by a campus official can range from a warning to a fine, or even mandatory anti-smoking classes.

Most initiatives were led by students striving to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke and promote a health conscious campus lifestyle. But both of those points are straight up bullshit.

First off, second hand smoke. Slate sifted through the data from the 2006 California Air Resources Board Study and a 2007 study from Stanford to discover the truth about secondhand smoke exposure. Smoking in an enclosed public space, like inside of a bar or a restaurant, can potentially yield negative effects for people within the range of 6.5 feet. Further than that, and the harm is reduced to “background effects” or “breathing close to regular air.”

From Slate:

Studies of secondhand smoke have indeed moved outdoors. Their findings support restrictions on lighting up within a few feet of other people. But they don’t warrant more than that.”

In other words, the effects of secondhand smoke cannot be used to justify a smoking ban that spans across every square-inch of campus property. Just give us a few strategically placed smokers’ oases and everybody wins. It certainly doesn’t justify a ban on smokeless tobacco, but they came up with a reason to prohibit that, too: it doesn’t promote a healthy lifestyle.

Basically, colleges are now taking it upon themselves to instill in their students the habits of healthy living. But this isn’t elementary school we’re talking about. College students are grown adults. They should be permitted to do anything they want as long as it doesn’t harm others. Universities bear neither the responsibility nor the right to impose a restriction on something simply because it is bad for their personal health. Same reason they can’t stop (not so little) miss social warrior from housing Chick-Fil-A sandwiches all day (but if they played by their own rules of logic, fast food would be higher on the termination list than tobacco seeing as obesity kills more people).

I appreciate you caring about our health, universities, but your responsibilities lie solely with a student’s education. As Americans, we have the right to slowly but surely rot our gums and lungs from the inside out, throwing thousands of dollars and dozens of years of life down the drain in the process. Dammit, it’s what the founding fathers would have wanted.

[via Slate, Tobacco Free Campus]

Image via YouTube

  1. HawaiianShirtFridays

    I will buy some Rowdy Gentleman shit if y’all blackball helmet stickers.

    9 years ago at 8:27 am
  2. puffdaddy

    Rule of thumb: if you’re banning something, nine out of ten times, that’s un-American.

    9 years ago at 8:29 am
  3. ScoochMcGooch

    Public smoking is un-American. Your right ends when it restricts or harms others. I don’t give a shit what you do at home or that you smell like an ancient unwashed taint. But second-hand smoke is destructive to the health of everyone nearby and kills nearly 50k people every year.

    9 years ago at 8:31 am
    1. ScoochMcGooch

      Also, your link to Slate didn’t work, but your quote matched a Time article from 2009. And learn to fucking read. That 6.5ft applies to a single smoker outdoors. The rest of the that very sentence mentions how that all changes with multiple smokers. And changes again with “walls or fences,” because walls still affect air flow outdoors, dumbass.

      9 years ago at 8:46 am
    2. johnnyblueballs69

      Smoking is not destructive outside unless maybe you are literally right snext to someone and the wind is blowing it all in your face. If you don’t like smoking but you are walking that close to someone that’s smoking, you’re a dumbass plain and simple.

      9 years ago at 9:34 am
      1. ScoochMcGooch

        Hey, numbnuts. The very study you guys are quoting says 6.5ft for one smoker outdoors. More smokers, add to that distance. Walls nearby, add again. You fucks stand in front of the door anyway.

        9 years ago at 9:45 am
  4. Confraterate Flag

    Your first problem was expecting a policy created by liberals to be logical

    9 years ago at 8:43 am
  5. T-Shirt Chair

    I just love how figures of authority believe putting up signs will deter people from doing stuff. Gun free zone? Oh yeah that makes me feel better. Smoke free zone? Nobody will smoke here! Speed limit is radar enforced? Better slow down! Jesus.

    9 years ago at 8:44 am
  6. bourboncountry

    They cant enforce it and the signs are pretty fun to steal. So its really no big deal unless you care what the Phi Mu in the campus health t-shirt thinks about you…and if you do then you are a bitch.

    9 years ago at 8:57 am
  7. Nutsack814

    This is America, where people should be free to make the rules on the property they own without other people telling them what they should do. That being said, if the school wants to make this a rule, it’s their God-given right and the real fucking liberal logic would be anyone telling them how to govern what they own.

    9 years ago at 8:57 am
      1. Nutsack814

        Which means they legally own the property and can make whatever rules they want no matter how much we hate them. Why do you think you and I can’t carry a gun there either?

        9 years ago at 9:24 am
      2. maroonandgold

        I wasn’t really arguing with your main point. You did kind of infer that the school owns the land though, which isn’t 100% true. Probably shouldn’t have commented in the first place, but I’m just setting the record straight.

        9 years ago at 9:33 am
  8. ASUWhoreMongor

    Asu is all about this shit. Cant even pack a fatty in the library without getting yelled at

    9 years ago at 9:24 am
  9. FratterNation

    What’s the point of banning smokeless tobacco? No one ever died from secondhand spit. Just proof they want to tell us how to live our lives.

    9 years ago at 10:05 am
  10. Alcrowholic

    Shit, a lot of the time, nicotine and tobacco products are the only luxuries a pledge can have. By schools forcefully taking that right away from them, wouldn’t that be considered hazing? Think about it libs.

    9 years ago at 10:12 am