Colin Cowherd Ranked College Football Teams Into 4 Tiers, Let’s Debate Them

Top tier football teams

Everyone loves to break things down into tiers. Top tier is the place to be. Whether we are talking about top tier talent in females, fraternity tiers, or tiers of college football teams, it’s just human nature to rank things as better than others. Colin Cowherd decided to rank college football teams into tiers by how good they are all-time.

Here is him talking about his tiers:

His top tier includes:

-Alabama
-Michigan
-Notre Dame
-Ohio State
-Oklahoma
-USC

Tier Two is:

-Auburn
-Florida State
-Miami
-Tennessee
-Texas

Tier Three is:

-Clemson
-Florida
-Georgia
-LSU
-Wisconsin

And finally, he only had one team in his tier 4: BYU. So essentially, he ranks BYU as the 17th best team all-time. Think about that.

His top tier teams are spot on. You won’t see any argument from me, or any sane college football fan who knows anything about the sport. Bama, Michigan, Ohio State, OU, Notre Dame, and USC have been powerhouses and when you think of winning football traditions, those schools come to mind.

Let’s take a look at the obvious glaring omissions from his list:

Penn State
Nebraska
UCLA

The AP poll made a list of the best teams all-time by ranking teams by how they’ve finished in the AP poll since 1936. Texas comes in at number 7, Nebraska at 8, Tennessee at 9, Penn State at 10, and LSU at 11. So tier two could be rearranged a little, but tier 3 is a mess.

Clemson and Wisconsin come in at 25 and 23, respectively, on AP’s list. Not only are they further down the list, but to say they are better all-time than the likes of PSU and Nebraska is stupid. You can taint Penn State’s image all you want with the Paterno scandal, but you can’t take away what they did on the field.

And BYU? Are you serious? BYU ranked number 60 on the AP list of all-time teams. That means that on average, since the AP poll began, 59 teams have finished better than BYU. That includes teams like SMU (thank you, Sherwood Blount), Duke, Army, Purdue, Kentucky, and Penn.

Colin is just trolling us as usual, right?

Image via YouTube

  1. Shoeless Bro Jaxon

    What is this list based on. All-time wins, then Harvard and Penn belong upper tier. Tennessee has over 800 wins. That is top-tier stuff. Not buying into this list at all.

    9 years ago at 12:34 pm
  2. SirCarlosIII

    Mu humble opinion as an Auburn fan.
    Tier 1: OU, OSU, Texas, Michigan, ND, Bama, Nebraska, USC
    Tier 2: Auburn, FSU, Tenn, Miami, UGA, PSU
    Tier 3: LSU, UF, Wisc, MSU
    Just top of my head.

    9 years ago at 1:12 pm
      1. DornFromMajorLeague

        Clemson grad but a Panthers fan from charlotte so Auburn is alright in my book

        9 years ago at 4:33 pm
  3. Shut up Meg

    This list should be based on cultivation of talent and post season w’s.

    9 years ago at 1:18 pm
  4. DornFromMajorLeague

    I’ll agree with most of this list since he’s talking about the entire history of college football. If he had been talking about just the current state of college football, these tiers would be seriously fucked up.

    9 years ago at 1:38 pm
  5. NUagsJAKE

    It’s already been said but how do you not immediately think of Nebraska on that. You can’t deny 5 national titles and one of the most dominating stretches ever in the 90’s only being beat by maybe this decades Alabama teams. Makes sense if it was off the top of his head though cause Nebraska has been kinda shitty as of late.

    9 years ago at 3:09 pm
    1. RoyTinCup

      People never recognize how good they were but even a Big Red fan shouldn’t be able to deny the cheating from Osborne and his staff during that run. No kid wants to go from Tx/SoCal/Miami to Nebraska without $$$ or drugs or women.

      9 years ago at 11:38 pm
      1. Gotham Fratman

        What an idiotic statement. If you knew anything about Nebraska football, you’d know that the dominating teams of the 70s and early 80s (top 10 finishes every year) were built by the in-state walk on program – high profile recruits didn’t come until the latter part of the 80s. Even then, college football historians attribute Nebraska’s success to domination in the trenches, where they rarely ever started non-upperclassmen, and the majority of starters were in state prospects.

        9 years ago at 12:02 am