Entropy, Morality, And Girls
en·tro·py
noun
1. a thermodynamic quantity representing the unavailability of a system’s thermal energy for conversion into mechanical work, often interpreted as the degree of disorder or randomness in the system.
Let’s imagine for a moment that a 17th-century farm hand steps into a researcher’s idling time machine and accidentally zaps himself into present-day New York City. Now let’s say that, upon arrival, he becomes so afraid and overwhelmed by the closing walls of human advancement that he runs into the street, causing a car to swerve into oncoming traffic, which kills the family of four travelling inside. Surely, he’s not guilty of murder, at least not intentionally. But, is his ignorance forgivable? How much of what he did was a choice? He did not have to run away. He did not have to be so gripped by fear that he disregarded the value of humanity around him. Four people died because he couldn’t find the resolve to stop and take a breath. But, he was overwhelmed. He didn’t know.
This past week, the elevator to my building opened to reveal the luggage cart just sitting there, riding up and down, a taciturn passenger for who knows how long. Someone borrowed it to carry something — groceries, a box of rowdy-gentleman tee-shirts — up to their apartment and then lacked the care to return it back to the front desk. I was so perplexed by this that I relayed the story to a date two nights ago. She kind of slyly smiled and revealed that she, too, will send the cart back down the elevator — just the cart — once she’s done with it; as if the cart will sprout sentience when no one’s looking and just wheel itself back to its proper place, like a mundane, shitty version of Toy Story. Her reasoning was that sending it back down was better than leaving it on her floor. When I challenged her, she said never really considered how things would play out after that. Ok. Check, please. But, here’s my question: Is she a dick? It’d be easy to say yes. But her intention wasn’t ill; it was more willfully ignorant.
I’ve been thinking on this idea of ignorance versus innocence and all of its permutations in between. Once you get inside it, you can’t escape it. I see it everywhere. Did the person who just cut me off know I was driving there? Was the guy who shouldered me on the subway overcome with the grief from a dying loved one? I find it most interesting — as is my wont — in the context of relationships. I get a lot of emails from girls asking me what it means when a guy won’t get back to her. “Should I text, again?” Frequently, they make excuses for him (which is hilarious): “He’s really busy, so I get it.” Oh, is he? Is he too busy to go to the gym? Too busy to watch TV? Too busy to call a friend? If he’s doing any of those things, you are officially a lower priority in his life. That’s a hard reality, but it’s a true one, and it’s not necessarily a bad one. Should you (and I’m speaking to guys now, too) — a veritable stranger — immediately occupy a space of importance in anyone’s life? Or, if we can put aside ego, would it more realistic and normal to expect that person to continue living for themselves? Most people are not intentional in their disregard. Ignorance may not be innocence, but it’s important to separate malice from apathy.
There is real, Cosby-level bad in this world. I believe that. But I also think that the vast majority of the perceived injustices on Earth are a blunder of existence, the natural outgrowth of molecules bumping into each other ad infinitum, the frictionous result of people living for themselves while trying to live for others. In the end, even our most unselfish actions are for selfish purposes. We can’t escape our own ego; we can’t break free from the pleasure that can be derived from displeasure. If we do something, then it is, by definition, something we wanted to do. The only entropy is our capacity for love. And in that vast, freeing gray space, I have to wonder, how can we blame anyone?
So what I’m saying is: Sarah, I’m not going to call you back. Don’t be pissed. Think of yourself as a luggage cart, left adrift, riding an elevator, waiting to be found..

I’ll take Sarah off your hands for you. I love some sloppy seconds.
10 years ago at 11:42 amNice name
10 years ago at 12:08 pmYour IQ is higher than the rest of the TFM staff combined
10 years ago at 11:42 amJTrain should be promoted to VP, he is easily the best writer. Also fuck dorn.
10 years ago at 11:46 amThis left me more confused than a True Detective McConaughey rant but well done
10 years ago at 11:49 amJTrain, I liked the article and love the podcast. That being said, I suspect this was written with considerable assistance of Adderall and a thesaurus.
10 years ago at 11:50 amRead a book, you Neanderthal.
10 years ago at 1:23 pmAre you sad
10 years ago at 2:11 pmYour moms face is on top of me
10 years ago at 3:46 pmCan we get an article that addresses the motives behind school boards going way over the top in the sensitivity and acceptance movement? Not just written from the outsider’s hot take on it. I get it. Damn liberals… But I want a JTrain, deep, intellectual breakdown on what could possibly be the reason some board decided that “obese” is offensive and “a person of size” is PC. Do you think these board members share such extreme views that when they all get in a room together it’s no longer about reality and a fair perspective, and that it’s just a pissing match to be the most devout moral extremist? Is it narcissism at it’s core, or do these people truly believe in what they’re advising to their student body? We’re all thinking it. I’d like JTrain to put it into words.
10 years ago at 11:56 amThis comment is actually a pretty good outline for the column, I think.
10 years ago at 12:06 pmTo be perfectly honest I believe this conundrum in society originates as almost anything not made of absolute evil does, and that is good intentions, which get completely out of hand. I think the idea to hurt no persons feelings and constrict our society to that of a politically correct utopia starts of with well wishes but in turn, develops into a bullshit society stripped of all opinion turning freedom of speech into a mythic concept or an outdated ideology. Is their really freedom of speech anymore in a dystopianesque future where you can say anything you want but just be damn aware that the next day you are going to have to turn around and offer a public apology. That is what it has become. Look at Hulk Hogan. Not saying what he did was right (or wrong) but when a man carries the majority of the wrestling entertainment world on his back for a decade or so, and in turn generates revenue for said entertainment to the umpteenth power and with one soundbite is fired and his name is removed from all association with the industry he helped build. Like I said as I started this tirade, the concept of absolute equality is a great concept, a concept that built this country, but when it comes at a cost of true freedom of speech, a freedom of speech that one does not need to apologize for that speech deemed free, then the glorious principles of American values seem to become counterproductive. What I mean is true freedom of speech and true equality seem to have become a pick one or the other at the hands of moral extremist, which dampens the mood of society turning us into beings herded through society as we walk on eggshells.
10 years ago at 2:39 pmThis would be an awesome topic to discuss between all the TFM users, you know in like a forum or something. Bring the forums back!
10 years ago at 3:18 pmYour articles are more thought provoking than most of the fiction novels we were required to read in high school and college. Keep up the fantastic work jtrain
10 years ago at 11:56 amWhile it’s fun to joke around on this website, it’s a breath of fresh air when you find an article like this that makes you think about things. Good article jtrain keep it up.
10 years ago at 12:29 pmThe comments say things to this effect a lot, but this shit has absolutely no place on TFM.
10 years ago at 12:35 pmYou have no place here. Jtrain is a frat sage.
10 years ago at 2:16 pmMost people who criticize j-train typically get the same treatment Steve Holt gets. But I think you’re looking way too far into this. People don’t leave the cart in the elevator because they’re ignorant. They do it because they’re lazy. They know the cart won’t reach its destination by its self. But some person will roll it out when the elevator reaches the first floor. Think of going up, then down, then up again in a high rise. That takes a while. Therefore, the whole point of the article is lost. It’s simply a lack of care of laziness.
10 years ago at 12:38 pmThat’s your opinion, not fact idiot
10 years ago at 12:56 pmYou missed the point. When you leave the cart, you intentionally neglect your responsibility to return it. You do so without giving thought to any consequences – the ignorance. Laziness is irrelevant; and you are one of the willfully ignorant. Think about one of the infinite potential scenarios. Think, that’s the point.
10 years ago at 8:12 pm