FAIL FRIDAY: Fucking And Puking
Ten real submissions, 20 photos, and two videos that didn’t seem quite right. Names were omitted to protect the guilty.
Slapping the bass in my frat band called “Rancid Vulvas” every Wednesday night at the bar downtown. TFM.
Solid choice for a band name. Really solid.
If she’s in the bathroom for more than 3 minutes I know she’s pooping and I won’t talk to her anymore, ever! TFM.
A woman that poops is a woman you have to walk away from.
Eating a girl out by writing out the Greek alphabet with your tongue. TFM.
You’re seriously disturbed, but you know that.
Being a diehard Bengals fan but still buying a Manziel jersey. TFM.
You are the worst.
Coming to as you’re throwing up mid-fuck in the backseat of the slam’s car on New Year’s. TFM.
Puking while you’re fucking is a power move.
Seeing your gym and the gun store next to each other and realizing that you exercise your body in the same place you exercise your rights. TFM.
Get out.
I wear vests and I’ve got a big ass wang. Plus, I wear cologne… TFM.
Samesies.
Put my slams on a strict bacon diet so when I eat that butt it’s like breakfasts at Granny’s house. TFM.
Granny’s breakfasts apparently tasted like bacon and butt.
Knew I was the man by the age of 6, had the babysitter sucking our dicks. TFM.
Solid bars from Frake (Frat Drake).
In retrospect, having her twerk on my face after eating hot wings wasn’t the best decision that I’ve made. TFM.
We’re done here. Moving on to photos.
This would’ve been a Forum post, but thanks to Dorno I have to say this on an unrelated article.
I’m sick of people misinterpreting the 2nd amendment, Republicans and Democrats. It’s not about hunting or protection from home invaders, it’s about protection from your government and the ability to fight against the government if it becomes tyrannical. So when people say Americans shouldn’t be allowed to own assault rifles, I question whether they understand the Constitution. What if the fighters of the Revolutionary War hadn’t been allowed to own guns as good as the British?
10 years ago at 12:40 pmAgreed, its unfortunate how liberal and uninformed most of our fellow Americans can be.
10 years ago at 1:29 pmThat would have been the most shit forum post ever.
10 years ago at 1:46 pmKeep your shit opinion to yourself
10 years ago at 6:22 pmNo, Republicans and Democrats understand that it is the original intent of the 2nd Amendment. It’s not used as a talking point (at least by smart people) because it is hopelessly outdated. You don’t seem to understand the point of the Constitution; it was purposely written to be vague and malleable because the Founders couldn’t predict the future needs of the country. Recreation or home protection is the only valid reason for guns, “fighting against the government” is for paranoid retards.
And Americans in the Revolutionary War weren’t on parity with the British. We had to raid British armories for guns and ammo or have them imported from France.
10 years ago at 2:29 pmAlso, being able to own assault rifles doesn’t *quite* put us on par with your own government, if it became tyrannical.
10 years ago at 2:38 pm*our own government. Fuck. Laps being taken.
10 years ago at 2:39 pmThere are 1.38 million active personnel in our military. About 35 percent Americans report having a gun in their house and there are 89 guns per 100 people in America. That leaves about 290 million guns in America. For the sake of argument lets say that one tenth of those 290 million guns are put to use during a revolution against our sampled tyrannical government. Keeping in mind that this is a low end safe and reasonable estimate, we still out man our government’s military by 25:1 in this hypothetical situation. Soldiers on the ground have always and will always win wars. Not only that, in the given circumstance it would be politically unfeasible for our government to use drones, jets, bombs, etc. against it’s own “insurgents” (what the revolutionaries would be called by the media in such an event) because it would drastically swing public opinion against the government’s cause. So to sum things up, we wouldn’t need to be “on par” with our government’s infinite arsenal as long as our militia paralleled the small arms firepower of our military in said situation. Our victory would be triumphant, we would run train on our government’s asshole, and this is the very reason our government hasn’t disarmed the public to this day (Which there is absolutely nothing they would love to do more, in the name of “safety” to increase their own power as necessary).
tl; dr
10 years ago at 1:59 amOur militia would outnumber the government by 25+:1, the government would be handcuffed in its ability to use certain weapons while maintaining public support outside the “insurgents” rebelling against tyranny, and we would prevail.
I agree that it’s intent was to be somewhat vague because, as you said, they could not fortell the future. However, they left it open so that it could apply to everyone, not just those who wanted to kill deer and phesants.
I don’t follow you when you say it’s hopelessly outdated. It created the groundwork for our freedoms. Eventhough technology changes, the basic freedoms do not. Maybe I have misunderstood you. Can you expound?
10 years ago at 2:40 pmMr. Nice Try,
10 years ago at 3:23 pmI am not going to criticize you but will instead try to teach you what the point of “shall not be infringed” means and why it is important to have an armed citizenry.
Bottom line upfront: It is a deterrent against excessive police power. Most liberty loving people mistakenly protest against cops. The real culprit is the large number of laws and regulations and the authority that cops are allowed to enforce that is the problem. A well armed community is a deterrent against crime.
The less crime there is, the less need for cops. The more crime there is, the more need for cops. When we need more cops, they get a larger budget and they hire more cops, which in turn must enforce more and more laws and regulation in order to justify the need for a large police force. The larger the police force becomes, the more it must be fed citations and charges to justify its existence.
It is a supply/demand issue.
Some of the worst organizations in our communities are the Police Unions. They clamor for more and more authority and they exaggerate crime and create a false sense of crisis in order to whip up support for more police and higher wages. They Unions do this because they receive dues from the policemen, which is usually around 5% of their salary. The Police Unions put out lots of information to the media touting about how dangerous police jobs are, when in fact policemen have one of the least dangerous jobs in the country. Read this and see what I mean http://www.infowars.com/shut-up-officer/
When a police force knows that the community is heavily armed, they treat its citizens with more respect.
One of the worst laws to ever be passed was the 1968 law that prohibited citizens with a felony from having most firearms. Any felony that gets you a sentence of one year or more, will take away your right. The law does not care if you are convicted of rape of tax evasion. Anything over a year does it. I bet you did not know that the second offense for not complying with ObamaCare is a tax evasion felony. If you refuse to comply with ObamaCare, you lose your gun.
Actually, Jefferson envisioned that we Constitution would evolve, but by amending it. Not by interpreting it. He surmised that we would have a new set of Amendments roughly every 20 years or so.
Arms mean arms, and yes, the point is to be able to overthrow the government, if necessary. And so what if assault rifles don’t put us on par with the government. First of all, this assumes all soldiers would side with the government over the people, doubtful. And second of all, the Brits outgunned us, we outgunned the Vietnamese etc. It’s not just about guns, it’s about motivation, numbers, knowing the terrain (home field advantage), and many other factors. There’s 300 million guns owned by 53 million Americans in this country that the government knows about. If the government tried to really pull some shit, yes, we could overthrow it, probably quite easily.
Lastly, saying that the right to bear arms covered in the Constitution is like saying that the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment doesn’t protect what we are doing right now. Expressing our opinions on the internet. Because you know, the internet wasn’t around in 1789, just like AR-15’s weren’t.
10 years ago at 3:51 pmNo, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were vaguely written because they could not agree. While everybody knew the Confederation was not working, James Madison and the Federalists were seen as paving a way for the erosion of individual liberties, state and local governments, and eventually leading towards a monarchy. To get Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, and other anti-Federalists on board for signing the document, the Bill of Rights was offered (albeit wasn’t officialy added until 2 years later) as a compromise to guarantee INDIVIDUAL rights. I find it rediculous that so many people see the 1st, then 3rd-9th as protecting individual rights while the 2nd Amendment is collective. That idea is even rediculous when one remembers that the establishment of an army was already addressed in Article 1.
10 years ago at 5:21 pmThe wording of the 2nd Amendment is arguably just as collective is it is individual. One purpose certainly was to protect the right of the people of each colony to keep their state militias well-regulated, meaning among other things, well-organized and well-armed. It was as much about state vs. federal power as it was about an individual’s rifle, or a town’s rifles. Scholars have made both arguments for over 200 years. Neither view is entirely right or wrong. And more tits, dammit.
10 years ago at 9:45 pmThe Supreme Court, on at least 3 seperate occasions, begs to differ.
10 years ago at 10:33 pmSplit decisions, which was my point, douche.
10 years ago at 11:59 pmAnd 5 old guys with an agenda don’t know anything about more tits, which was my main point. So fuck you twice.
10 years ago at 12:03 amDon’t get me wrong, you couldn’t of nailed that any better. Looking from another guy’s perspective though, I like to believe our forefathers fought and died for our 2nd amendment not only to protect us from any tyranny that we might come across throughout our country’s history, but to able to sleep at night knowing whenever we tuck our kids into bed every night, they’ll be out of harms way from any sorry son of a bitch that tries to change that. Being able to hunt’s just the icing on the cake.
10 years ago at 5:44 pmI disagree. Home protections and hunting are reasonable reasons to own a gun. Protecting yourself from government tyranny is not. Do you really think your pistol or hunting rifle is going to help if the government decides to (for some reason) become tyrannical?? And so that begs the question, “Where do we draw the line?” To actually fight the United States fucking government you would need tanks, anti aircraft equipment, all kinds of shit. And I think we agree that the average citizen should not be able to walk into a store and buy a rocket launcher. The constitution is outdated, man. I don’t mind people owning weapons for protection and hunting. But I also believe there is no reason to own an assault rifle.
10 years ago at 1:46 amMy friend,
I beg to differ with you on one part. A trained man with a good, properly maintained rifle is a very deadly weapon. Yes, we have more advanced weaponry, but those weapons cannot be everywhere at once. Thus, a man with a rifle can stand against an oppressive group.
10 years ago at 10:30 amI think we should also ban tactical butter knives. Those things are deadly af.
10 years ago at 1:55 pmI draw the line right at my front door. Cross that and you will be stacked 2 deep and 8 High with the other tyrants.
10 years ago at 11:37 pmRepublicans and Democrats in our government know the original purpose of the 2nd amendment, but democrats are able to rely on the fact that their uninformed supporters will blindly listen to them as long as they continue giving them handouts.
10 years ago at 12:35 pmVery well put…
Honestly though, I am not too worried about a tyrannical government here. The only people stupid enough to try to pull some shit like that would be the Liberals and I really dont think that if shit hit the fan that the military would carry out a bunch of the liberal pussies bullshit orders. Most military members are Conservative/Republican/Independent and would not fight against their own families and loved ones.
10 years ago at 2:13 pmThe granny’s breakfast bacon, butt-eating metaphor sounded pretty frat to me.
10 years ago at 12:44 pmI’d like to thank the fathers who neglected their daughters in order for that chaser video to be possible.
10 years ago at 12:56 pmGlad we got to see the inside of Gronk’s new bus in that chaser video.
10 years ago at 1:08 pmIntern, I don’t hate you because you are a shit packer, you’re a shit packer and I hate you.
10 years ago at 1:09 pmThe most American chaser of all time:
http://www.onlinefreecinema.me/movies/american-sniper
Happy Friday you ungrateful fucks. High dive into a woodchipper, Intern.
10 years ago at 1:09 pmIf you didn’t watch that chaser then you most definitely fucked up…
10 years ago at 1:15 pmI thoroughly enjoyed the lifting fails.
10 years ago at 1:28 pmPretty good hall if they stole those. That’s like $8 million in razor blades.
10 years ago at 1:44 pmHaul, dumbass. I know people hate grammar nazis, but that is just ignorant.
10 years ago at 2:19 pmOh lawd forgive me my typo-producing ways. Get off my nuts, cocksucker.
10 years ago at 3:24 pmU did well intern.
10 years ago at 1:53 pmYou must be new here.
10 years ago at 2:18 pmSo new haha
10 years ago at 2:23 pmTits or GTFO.
10 years ago at 2:43 pmWatch the sexist remarks, sexism is wrong. And being wrong is for women.
10 years ago at 4:01 pmMm im not a big feminist.. No worries
10 years ago at 4:04 pmRandomblackchick is back.
10 years ago at 2:27 pmAsian
10 years ago at 2:35 pmAhhh werrrr herrrrooo then
10 years ago at 3:11 pmIt’s “ni hao”
10 years ago at 3:16 pm“Ni hao you pay me now?”
10 years ago at 3:22 pmU wish
10 years ago at 3:25 pmGetting the attention you’re looking for, sweetheart?
10 years ago at 3:59 pmTouché
10 years ago at 4:03 pm