Here’s The Kim Jong-un Death Scene That Might Start World War III

Screen Shot 2014-12-18 at 11.03.53 AM

When news first broke that theater chains were pulling the movie “The Interview,” I immediately thought this was an elaborate marketing ploy. Suddenly, this movie had become a must-see due to the amount of controversy it was starting to stir up. Well played, Sony–or so I thought. With more information coming out now, it is rather transparent that this wasn’t a brilliant tactic to put asses in cinema seats. No, this was one of the world’s biggest studios bitching out because of this fucking clown:

Screen Shot 2014-12-18 at 10.35.08 AMImage via Youtube

Just look at that stupid fucking haircut. How does that instill fear?

Today, Sony announced it is not releasing the movie on any platform, essentially wiping its hands clean and getting as far away from this film as possible.

I feel like I’m the father of a child who struck out during a T-ball game. I’m not mad, I’m just disappointed. Whenever James Franco and Seth Rogen collaborate on a film, it’s absolutely hilarious.

Now, I’m sure this whole flick will eventually get leaked and I’ll find the appropriate channels to see it in its entirety, but here is the Kim Jong-un death scene:

It’s rather tame if you ask me. Sure, it’s a little emasculating to go out to a Katy Perry song, but it was done in a rather tasteful light. Imagine how excessively awesome it could have been in the hands of Quentin Tarantino.

[via The Telegraph]

  1. BeerOlympics

    Agreed. He should be happy Sony didn’t recruit the biggest goober around to play his part in the film, because they easily could have.

    11 years ago at 11:34 am
  2. Fratmiral Nelson

    Hollywood is always congratulating themselves on how brave they are, but when terrorists actually put their bravery to the test they hide like pussies. This whole thing makes me fucking irate.

    11 years ago at 11:40 am
  3. Frock_Itch

    What a bunch of spineless cowards for pulling this movie. Let the castration of America continue.

    11 years ago at 11:43 am
    1. ChrisHarrison

      Honestly, they had no choice. It’s a legal nightmare. Had any of the terrorist acts occurred it all would have been pinned on theatres and Sony for knowingly putting viewers in danger. Tons of people wouldn’t have gone to see it anyways because of these threats. Releasing it straight to DVD would be smarter financially now, too.

      11 years ago at 12:55 pm
      1. Delts4Bush

        America was founded on Freedom, and within the first constitutional right is Freedom of Speech; the fact that cyber terrorists, and even worse N. Korean cyber terrorists, were able to deprive Americans of this right is downright embarrassing.

        11 years ago at 1:32 pm
      2. Channel4NewsTeam

        Your freedom of speech is protected from the government not from Sony, nobody was denied any freedoms. A private entity exercised their rights by deciding not to show the movie after they determined it was in their best interests. I would have much rather we showed the movie obviously, but if a domestic terrorist attack had occurred you couldn’t really justify “Well these moviegoers died for their country” just to prove a point. It was a no-win situation for Sony, and in the end it’s just a movie and nobody really takes North Korea seriously anyways.

        11 years ago at 5:52 pm
      3. Delts4Bush

        If nobody takes North Korea seriously then why did they pull the movie due to the risk of North Korean terrorist attacks?

        11 years ago at 7:10 pm
      4. TTokenM

        The companies are not worried about terrorist attacks that would include bombings or shootings. They are worried about cyber attacks and all their dirt also being revealed. They don’t care about the moviegoers, they care about their image.

        11 years ago at 8:24 pm
      5. Beecher1843

        Smart because of the threats? Maybe. Financially smart? Not at all. They’ve already spent about all the money they will on the movie with producing it and filming it, reportedly $44 million so far. Studios make a vast percentage of their money on movies from the theater runs. You make a hell of a lot more money when every person watching needed to pay $8 to see it, versus paying $3 to rent it and then a whole group of people can watch it. If they don’t release it in theaters they will absolutely loose money.

        11 years ago at 1:37 pm
      6. Buffbro95

        *lose money. I’ll take laps for this as long as you learn the fucking difference

        11 years ago at 2:22 pm
      7. Beecher1843

        Good catch. That was my fault. Not the first time I’ve posted something and instantly wish you could edit comments on here.

        11 years ago at 8:51 pm
      8. DocJCE

        It’s financially smart. With the number of theaters that opted out of showing the film, they wouldn’t have a chance at making back the investment. If they don’t release it, then they get to make a total loss claim to the insurance company. That’s why it won’t be released in any form. If they release it later on DVD, that would void the insurance claim.

        Making sure your ass is covered by insurance TFM

        11 years ago at 4:38 pm
  4. CheapBeerandChubbies

    The most insulting thing about the cancellation of the movie has to be that a bunch of oppressed, 3rd world computer geeks made the U.S. & Sony look like pussies

    11 years ago at 11:49 am
    1. TTokenM

      Sony is not a U.S. company and the U.S. was not hacked. North Korea made Sony look like pussies, the media is trying to make it the about the US. Government and military computers were not hacked from an outside source, which is the only thing the government proactively tries to protect.

      11 years ago at 12:54 pm
      1. IlluminatiBro

        Which, I’m sure, is the reason he said the U.S. AND Sony, indicating they are separate things. And Hollywood/ the movie theaters/ anyone who thinks this was a good idea are American and likely the pussies he was talking about. So, lawyered.

        11 years ago at 9:28 pm
    1. TFMSorrySir

      Why does it have to be one well-placed nuke? Why not carpet bomb that shithole with WMDs?

      11 years ago at 12:26 pm
      1. TFMSorrySir

        I’m fairly confident the US gov’t has already constructed more nukes than they know what to do with, but good try with the zinger

        11 years ago at 1:29 pm
      2. soldier_for_freedom

        Last I heard we had a 200 or more nukes, which would easily wipe north Korea of the earth. It is also more then anyone could do with.

        11 years ago at 8:00 pm
      3. Chabby

        Try 1920 (known) nukes in the current U.S. Strategic Arsenal. You could carpet bomb China and not run out.

        11 years ago at 12:41 am
      4. Whiskey_Ginger

        Also, that is only currently combat-ready nukes. Our actual arsenal is closer to 7000 warheads.

        11 years ago at 1:12 pm
    2. roofiebarz

      Yeah, let’s wipe out an entire country where 99% of people are innocent…great fucking idea there

      11 years ago at 1:28 pm
      1. RatchetRick

        innocent yes, but I hate to say it, they’re useless. They’re brainwashed to fuck

        11 years ago at 7:59 pm
    3. HNIC

      Why would we kill millions of innocent people because of one lunatic dictator whose only real crimes have been against his own people. Dumbass.

      11 years ago at 1:29 pm
      1. nedwos96

        What if the CIA hired two journalists to take him out instead? That’s a movie I would watch.

        11 years ago at 3:09 am
  5. Ace Ventura

    I still don’t understand why we give a damn what anyone in North fucking Korea thinks. No one goes to war over a video, unless of course you’re Obama talking about the violent protests in the Middle East which led to the deaths of multiple Americans that have never been avenged. However, Obama is a moron and he was wrong about that video so that shouldn’t come as a surprise.

    11 years ago at 11:52 am