Idk… I’d argue that if you truly were TFTC then no one would be calling a NF on you. You see, if someone is calling your frat (meaning the adjective as in “to be frat” not the noun which is short for fraternity) into question it most likely means that your frat (again, adjective) is worth questioning (this presupposes that the accuser is frat enough to make a valid accusation, otherwise the NF is deemed null and void). One would assume that if you are sufficiently frat enough to be TFTC, then you would most likely not be accused of anything NF. Being accused of being NF necessitates that the party in question is NOT FRAT. Therefore, the argument that the accused is “too frat to care”, is NOT an acceptable defense to any NF claim.
Sir, this is where you are wrong. TFTC refers to the person is frat. Just because a person is frat does not mean that every single one of his actions has to be frat. So if the person in question does something that is NF, he can simply validate by saying that he is so frat in virtually every other aspect that it doesn’t even matter. That, my friend, is why TFTC is an acceptable defense to any NF claim.
In revising my statement, I will say that any argument is null unless we can establish a threshold at which someone is frat enough to truly be TFTC. This threshold must be designated by someone whom is HIGHLY frat and regarded as such by all frat stars and sorostitutes (we can discount the GDI’s because they are akin to crazy people and have no say in what is or is not frat). I would suggest that this person be, George W. Bush, a brother of the Phi chapter of the esteemed ΔKE fraternity. I think it is known far and wide by Greek individuals that Brother Dubya embodies all that it is to be frat and should therefore be petitioned to establish what will henceforth be know as the Bush TFTC Threshold of 2011.
If somebody rip-sticked down the hallway of the Pike chapter house wearing affliction, cargo capris, a satchel, and jersey shore sunglasses, would calling that person NF be out of line? No. Even if that person claimed to be too frat to care, they would be wrong.
What the fuck is “law class”? Do you go to a community college?
15 years ago at 5:47 pmBusiness Law/Intro to Law is a pretty common undergraduate class at many universities.
15 years ago at 6:26 pmor could be used as a general term for any course taken in law school. sounding crass while assuming the worst in your fellow fraternity men. NF
15 years ago at 10:14 pmI commonly refer to my PS 300 special topics class, Law and Argumentation, as “law class”.
15 years ago at 11:14 pmGoing to law school in Illinois, NF
15 years ago at 6:15 pmGoing to law school in Barbados, FaF
Getting a degree from one of the best universities in the nation. FaF
15 years ago at 10:03 pmCargo shorts, aeropostale, pooka shells. TFTC?
15 years ago at 6:30 pmHaha well played^
15 years ago at 8:58 amIdk… I’d argue that if you truly were TFTC then no one would be calling a NF on you. You see, if someone is calling your frat (meaning the adjective as in “to be frat” not the noun which is short for fraternity) into question it most likely means that your frat (again, adjective) is worth questioning (this presupposes that the accuser is frat enough to make a valid accusation, otherwise the NF is deemed null and void). One would assume that if you are sufficiently frat enough to be TFTC, then you would most likely not be accused of anything NF. Being accused of being NF necessitates that the party in question is NOT FRAT. Therefore, the argument that the accused is “too frat to care”, is NOT an acceptable defense to any NF claim.
15 years ago at 7:49 pmWin.
15 years ago at 10:20 pmget a fuckin life.
15 years ago at 10:22 pmLawyered.
15 years ago at 11:50 pmSir, this is where you are wrong. TFTC refers to the person is frat. Just because a person is frat does not mean that every single one of his actions has to be frat. So if the person in question does something that is NF, he can simply validate by saying that he is so frat in virtually every other aspect that it doesn’t even matter. That, my friend, is why TFTC is an acceptable defense to any NF claim.
15 years ago at 1:05 pmIn revising my statement, I will say that any argument is null unless we can establish a threshold at which someone is frat enough to truly be TFTC. This threshold must be designated by someone whom is HIGHLY frat and regarded as such by all frat stars and sorostitutes (we can discount the GDI’s because they are akin to crazy people and have no say in what is or is not frat). I would suggest that this person be, George W. Bush, a brother of the Phi chapter of the esteemed ΔKE fraternity. I think it is known far and wide by Greek individuals that Brother Dubya embodies all that it is to be frat and should therefore be petitioned to establish what will henceforth be know as the Bush TFTC Threshold of 2011.
15 years ago at 2:49 pmCool story Brother…keep up the good work.
15 years ago at 9:35 pmIf somebody rip-sticked down the hallway of the Pike chapter house wearing affliction, cargo capris, a satchel, and jersey shore sunglasses, would calling that person NF be out of line? No. Even if that person claimed to be too frat to care, they would be wrong.
14 years ago at 11:53 am