Indiana University “Amends” Law Allowing Cops To Enter Greek Houses Whenever They Want, But Nothing Will Change

accbc5f7c5064e58691c7768ac1f5bfa

Indiana University rolled out a set of rules and regulations in early August including a law permitting police officers to enter Greek houses whenever they wanted without a permit.

In wake of the negative blowback from students (as well as national concern for the students’ 4th amendment rights), IU has amended the law on September 7.

Here’s what the law used to say:

screen-shot-2016-09-09-at-1-24-30-pm-copy

IU Spokesperson Margie Smith-Simmons says the amended version of the law makes it clear that students’ 4th amendment rights are not being violated. She adds that violating their rights was never their intention.

Here’s what the new wording entails, according to Indiana Public Media:

The new wording is more limited. IU Police officers can enter only if they believe laws are being broken and taking time to get a warrant would endanger the health of safety of residents.

The new wording is a step in the right direction towards fairness, but I’ve got a couple gripes.

First, stop saying “students,” Margie. This law does not apply to all students. Just Greeks. That’s one of the reasons it’s such dog shit.

Second, the new wording still allows cops to enter a house whenever they want without a warrant. Yes, you took out the part that allows police to enter a residence to thwart a “probable destruction of evidence.” That’s great. But the part you left in — the part about allowing cops to enter without a warrant if they “believe laws are being broken” — still allows cops to break a students’ 4th amendment rights. “Believe laws are being broken” is far too broad of a term. A cop will walk by a house, hear music, deduce that there is likely a party and therefore underage drinking, then barge right in and bust it. If you want to be fair, make the law so cops can only enter if they believe there is “imminent danger” — not “imminent underage drinking.” Otherwise this re-wording is a farce.

According to an anonymous tipster from IU Greek life, the cops are already barging in unannounced for little to no reason. This re-wording of the law won’t change that — and saying that it will is an insult to your students’ intelligence.

[via Indiana Public Media]

Image via YouTube

  1. Gun_Slinger

    So if Dan was standing at the window of a fraternity house with his boobs exposed, could that be probable cause for indecent exposure or possibly drunken behavior?

    9 years ago at 2:18 pm
    1. Gamefrock69

      This calls for a hero…this calls for…The Brock.

      *Brock Turner sprints into frat castle butt naked at 3am.*
      *Stabs College Police Officers with his erect cock while drunk coeds cheer*
      *drags about 5 officers behind greek village dumpsters and has his way*

      Crowd goes fucking nuts

      9 years ago at 3:45 pm
      1. beanfickersupreme

        I’m only laughing because you have an unhealthy fetish for Brock. I also hope an Auburn running back beats your fucking ass too.

        9 years ago at 6:28 pm
      2. Gamefrock69

        They hate on the Brock but they cannot catch the Brock…he is just too fast, slippery and naked

        9 years ago at 7:54 pm
  2. Frats_n_hats

    To be fair the the administration, most of the people that go there are really stupid

    9 years ago at 2:21 pm
    1. ChristianPKP

      false. IU has a tits business program and a crazy amount of talent from the midwest and east coast. Plus their bar scene is a good time. I’d mention soccer but absolutely nobody cares.

      9 years ago at 11:27 am
  3. frat_v_wade

    Any arrest that comes out of this will be immediately thrown out for violating the 4th Amendment. Cops must obtain a warrant to enter any residence barring a very limited set of exceptions. IU will get sued by the Guinea pig arrestee for blatantly implement policies that violate the constitution and tuition will go up because of the massive settlement they have to pay. Smart play Indiana.

    9 years ago at 5:04 pm
    1. nmass676

      You’re almost all the way correct. Exigency trumps it. If the law walks up because of a dope call, and they watch someone through a window flushing it, they can go in to “secure evidence”. Then, they must back out to apply for the warrant. That’s one example. But there are others.

      9 years ago at 6:26 pm