Man Forced To Leave College For Resembling A Female Student’s Rapist

Man Forced To Leave College For Reminding Female Student Of Her Rapist

As long as you get semi-decent grades, maintain a steady source of income to pay for tuition (most people’s parents cover this part), and refrain from ripping the water fountain off the wall after getting blasted in your dorm room, you should manage to avoid being booted from your university.

Unfortunately for one unnamed man at an unnamed liberal arts college in Oregon, he played by the rules and still got the ax — all for merely resembling the rapist of a fellow female student.

From Campus Reform:

In a recent commentary in the Harvard Law Review, Professor Janet Halley exposed a case from an unnamed liberal arts university in Oregon in which a student was “ordered to stay away from a fellow student (cutting him off from his housing, his campus job, and educational opportunity) —- all because he reminded her of the man who had raped her months before and thousands of miles away.”

The student, also unnamed, was found to be innocent of any misconduct. Even so, the order remained in place, putting him at constant risk of violating it and facing disciplinary action.

While the university didn’t technically kick him out, a restraining order that prevents him from coming within sight of another student severely limits the possibility of going to class. Maybe he can squeeze in all his classes while she’s away on break?

This is one of the most ridiculously unfair things I’ve ever heard of. There are so many questions left unanswered. Just to list the first few that pop into my head:

1. How the fuck was this allowed to happen?
2. Why didn’t the girl leave instead?
3. Is the dude being given some compensation for being forced to leave? (I think a full-ride to any college of his choosing would be somewhat closer to the realm of a fair trade.)
4. How the flying, ghastly fuck was this allowed to happen?

Numbers two and three remain a mystery — and will probably remain a mystery given how much protection these kinds of cases hide behind — but the answer to one and four come in the form of another number: nine. Title IX, that is. The educational amendment that is universally lauded for giving women the opportunity to compete in university-funded sports programs has a bitchy second head, like that girl (those girls?) from “American Horror Story,” which deals with anything that could be considered sexual discrimination.

That head has been quietly butt-fucking a slew of men since Title IX was implemented in 1972, and Halley wants to cut it off. She’s starting with Harvard, but would undoubtedly like to see campuses nationwide follow suit.

With regard to Title IX at Harvard, she says that there exists an undeniable bias in the way that alleged rape cases are handled that favors women.

Halley goes on to write that such commitment prohibits women “from assuming agency about their own lives.”

“Since when was that a feminist idea?” she asks.

I don’t know why the Title IX office was even involved in the first place. How does the case of a girl who gets anxiety from a fellow student because he resembles her rapist fall under the umbrella of sexual discrimination? If anything, it seems like the male is the one being discriminated against.

I also don’t know exactly how this guy reminded the female student of her rapist, but to prevent this from happening again, here’s some advice the rest of us college men should take to heart:

– Don’t wear hoodies, especially dark-colored ones (this should be a given).
– Don’t look at a girl’s ass. Yup, that ship has sailed, even if it’s in yoga pants.
– Don’t make eye contact with an unfamiliar woman for more than two seconds.
– Pickup lines must not stray from the basics: “What’s your name?” “What’s your major?” “I hope my advances won’t be construed as an attempt at forcing myself on you against your will, but may I ask if you would accompany me to the cinema this evening?”

What I do know is that feminism is a raging hurricane of one-sided legislation, estrogen, and bowl cuts. The only thing us men can do to shelter ourselves from the storm is to hunker down somewhere safe, keep to ourselves, and try not to look too rapey.

[via Campus Reform]

Image via Shutterstock

  1. Makers__Mark

    I’m not in favor of lawsuits unless absolutely necessary. But holy shit I would’ve sued the shit out of her for personal damages. If this hit the national spotlight he 100% would’ve been able to stay in school.

    11 years ago at 9:43 am
      1. HouseofFrats

        He forgot to say “Fuckin liberals” so that the tryhards will give him invaluable internet points

        11 years ago at 5:07 pm
      2. JakeFromState

        You mean I can’t use my points to buy all those sweet Rowdy Gent frocket tees!?

        11 years ago at 7:59 am
      3. eoufratdaddy

        Can confirm this did not happen at Eastern Oregon University, that leaves Southern Oregon University or Western Oregon University.

        11 years ago at 11:56 pm
      1. Frattastic13

        Starting to wonder when TFM will see this and post a retraction so they don’t look moronic.

        11 years ago at 3:37 am
      2. Alex Buscemi

        We have the word of a Harvard Law Professor and the word of a site with “Celebs” and “Horoscopes” as main categories that says it is “likely” false. Maybe it’s just because I’m a hard-nosed Scorpio, but I think I’ll leave it up for now. K33P Fratt1ng h4rd, buddy.

        11 years ago at 9:28 pm
  2. OmegaCollections

    How in the hell do we now live in a world where something like this is allowed? Fucking liberals have completely ruined this country.

    11 years ago at 9:46 am
      1. Bhami628

        Yea that’s like seeing and article of a fraternity fucking up, and then saying greek life is horrible. There are radical liberals as well as conservatives. People on this site tries to be a political scientist while being ignorant to actual facts

        11 years ago at 12:19 pm
      2. Bhami628

        And I’m not even a liberal, it’s just annoying seeing the ignorance on every comment thread

        11 years ago at 12:21 pm
    1. Teddy Fucking Roosevelt

      Breaking character slightly, and emulating The Tupacaplypse, I will openly admit that I am slightly to the left of a libertarian, though I do not count myself a liberal (or a conservative). And I am getting sick and tired of always hearing about how “liberals are ruining this country.” God. Damn. It. No. The people who are responsible for these school and city overreaches and idiotic/hypocritical responses to situations that we hear about all the time on this site are what are dragging America down, not the liberal population as a whole. Most liberals are reasonable people and will agree that this situation is completely uncalled for and ludicrously handled on the school/government’s part, just as most conservatives are reasonable people who would say the same exact thing. The liberal extremists and conservative extremists tear us down, not the greater moderate populations who like you and me just want to have the world be a better place. Do not judge the many for the actions of a few, which is a phrase I have heard often on this site when we express anger over how people judge the entire Greek system because one chapter on one campus does something terrible. Practice what you preach boys, or else we are no better than those hypocrites we battle against every day as Greek men. Teddy: out.

      11 years ago at 1:19 pm
  3. Fratbropotomus

    Honestly i dont think she should be made to leave, she has the same rights as he does. That being said forcing him to leave would be like the a person present at a Bank Robbery for baying any banks within their field of view…ever. Another case of a misguided system doing stupid shit to try and prevent other stupid shit would could have been prevented in the first place if people didn’t do stupid shit.

    11 years ago at 9:59 am
    1. Tuco_1855

      No one has to leave. She deals with it and stays, or she can’t get over it and leaves. Those are the only two options. He should be 100% uninvolved.

      11 years ago at 10:08 am
  4. Tuco_1855

    The rape victim here is clearly having a hard time moving on from the rape. I don’t presume the ongoing national shit storm that follows this little stunt is going to help her forget about it. I’m glad she brought this upon herself and I hope the University gets sued.

    11 years ago at 10:02 am
    1. 2fratty2fail

      I disagree with what’s happened like I imagine everyone else does, but what you just said was incredibly fucked up. Wishing that a woman, who you’ve acknowledged has been raped, mental harm is wrong. People commit suicide over this stuff. Wishing harm upon a woman is not a value supported by my fraternity, nor do I imagine it is it supported by yours. Say you wish that the administrators at the college get fired, say you want the rule overturned, but don’t say shit like “that woman who just got raped, she’s acting unreasonable right now, so I hope that she gets even more trauma and pain on a national scale.” We can disagree with rulings and we can be upset by false accusations, but don’t wish pain upon rape victims for no reason.

      11 years ago at 11:42 am
  5. Anal_yst

    This is just a symptom of two larger cultural issues:

    1. Everything that causes even the slightest bit of discomfort is “traumatic”. A 5 car pile up is traumatic. Feeling “uncomfortable” isn’t.

    2. The exalting of the victim way beyond the realms of typical legal mores. You can’t question or doubt a victim by virtue of being… a victim.

    11 years ago at 10:08 am
    1. JustForTheStory

      … The source article is Campus Reform. I’m going to bet this didn’t happen in any way remotely similar to how it’s described.

      11 years ago at 10:42 am
      1. JustForTheStory

        Is there another source other than this professor? Not trying to be a dick, but I just looked and I couldn’t find one.

        11 years ago at 1:01 pm
      2. Oral Hershiser

        The way it was written, given what the (supposed) basic facts are, I can’t imagine that it’s not true. I mean, obviously we don’t know all the details, and it’s possible there are nuances which would make it make a little more sense, but I just can’t see a Harvard professor and legal professional mis-characterizing the details of the case to the point where her commentary misrepresents the reality of the situation, just to make a point.

        For anyone interested, here’s the relevant text from the Harvard Law Review piece (since I don’t know HTML, I capitalized the words that were italicized in the article; otherwise this is a straight copy/paste):
        “I recently assisted a young man who was subjected by administrators at his small liberal arts university in Oregon to a month-long investigation into all his campus relationships, seeking information about his possible sexual misconduct in them (an immense invasion of his and his friends’ privacy), and who was ordered to stay away from a fellow student (cutting him off from his housing, his campus job, and educational opportunity) — all because he REMINDED her of the man who had raped her months before and thousands of miles away. He was found to be completely innocent of any sexual misconduct and was informed of the basis of the complaint against him only by accident and off-hand. But the stay-away order remained in place, and was so broadly drawn up that he was at constant risk of violating it and coming under discipline for THAT.”

        11 years ago at 3:35 pm