Mark Cuban’s Advice For The Republican Party: “Stay completely out of social issues.”

cubes

Remember how shitty the Dallas Mavericks were in the ’90s? They were as irrelevant to the NBA as strolling into Walgreens to grab some Plan B and a Gatorade on Sunday morning or two dudes banging each other while sharing a health insurance plan and wearing symbolic jewelry should be to a discussion about America’s prosperity and place as the global leader economically, politically, and against hostile extraterrestrial forces. Once billionaire, genius, playboy, philanthropist Mark Cuban bought the team, however, they turned into a perennial contender in the brutal Western Conference, culminating in a 2011 NBA championship over LeBron James and the Miami Heat, making Mark Cuban’s place among the best NBA owners ever undeniable, and sports trolls hate-gasm harder than they ever had before. Pretty sure Skip Bayless burst a blood vessel in his eye and passed out after that title.

Mark Cuban knows how to take something broken and turn it into something great. The Republican party is by no means broken, but its stances on many hotly debated social issues are most definitely a very squeaky wheel on what should be a well-oiled machine, especially when it comes to attracting younger voters who don’t quite grasp the importance or nuances of things like economic or foreign policy. Cuban, who leans to the right (he’s basically a libertarian), agrees. This is what Cuban said when asked, “How do you change the [political] conversation so that prosperity becomes part of the conversation again?” while on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”

“As long as we have the two parties that we have I don’t think it’s going to change. I mean if I was going to give guidance to the Republican party, which I think leads more in that direction, I’d say, ‘Stay completely out of social issues.’ And if you stay out of social issues then the conversation from that side will only be around economics and business, and growing business, and ideas. But they can’t stay out.”

While Cuban doesn’t mention which social issues he thinks the Republicans should back off of specifically, it’s pretty clear he is making reference to conservative politics concerning women’s reproductive rights and same sex marriage. Republican stances on both issues have helped Democrats and liberal media outlets alienate young voters away from the right by portraying the GOP as archaic, out of touch, and even hateful — especially over the past fourteen years. And, frankly, Republican opposition to the progress of both causes is not only a waste of time, but it’s just flat out wrong, not to mention WILDLY hypocritical for a party that purports to want to keep government out of the lives of citizens. It also doesn’t help that there aren’t any episodes of “Glee” about the free market.

Granted, there are other social (or quasi-social) issues Republicans are on the correct side of, such as gun control, and issues on which they have many valid points, though arguably not the entire answer, like immigration. Beyond all that, however, where the Republican party is strongest is in its desire and actual ability to build an environment and economy in which every individual is afforded the opportunities to succeed in whichever endeavor he or she chooses. Just, you know, arguably the most important American quality there is. That is why it is so important the Republicans focus fully on what really matters. It’s in the best interest of the United States that they do so. That’s where Cuban believes they should focus their energy, and, more importantly, their voices. Hard to disagree with the guy. The full clip is below.

  1. Bronito Mussolini

    The government HAS to be in social issues, end of discussion. Should it’s role be limited? Absolutely. To say that the government should have no play, though, is down right silly.

    If the alternative was true, than we’d still have slavery; “God” wouldn’t be in the Pledge of Allegiance (It was added in 1954 to “combat the atheist communists”), nor would it be on our money; women wouldn’t be able to vote.

    I’m typically called a Libertarian for this view: The role of the government in society should be for the sole protection of civil liberties, not attempting to influence our culture. Stick to protecting citizens and providing a stable economy, not telling two dudes they can’t get married. WAY more important topics to be discussing than what two people of the same sex decide to do under the sheets…

    11 years ago at 9:06 pm
    1. InHocSignoDrinkes

      “‘God’ wouldn’t be in the Pledge of allegiance” how Libertarian of you…

      11 years ago at 11:56 am
      1. Bronito Mussolini

        That is a completely pro-Libertarian stance by every definition of the word. You need to reevaluate your understanding of political ideologies.

        11 years ago at 5:36 pm
  2. BlackballThemAll

    The amount of run on sentences in this article actually gave me a headache

    11 years ago at 9:52 pm
  3. Mark Daniels

    Refreshing to see this kind of article on here and this kind of discussion in the comments.

    11 years ago at 10:28 pm
  4. Clive Fratsby

    This coming from the guy who’s been under fire since his remarks on social issues…

    11 years ago at 10:37 pm
  5. Brews

    Changing the focus away from social issues is something the party has been doing for the last couple of cycles now.

    Practically they can’t throw social issues completely under the bus or change stances because a HUGE voting block for the party is made up of evangelicals and old people. With too abrupt of a switch they would lose a lot more votes from older people than they would gain from younger people. While Republicans are not making these issues the focus questions still come in interviewsand debates and they must give a definitive answer. Thats what makes it a big Ole pickle.

    11 years ago at 6:11 am
  6. Shoeless.Bro.Jackson

    The only bedroom the government should be in is Dorn’s. Gotta keep an eye on that guy.

    11 years ago at 8:36 am
  7. BillyFratterson

    I’m sick of dems trying to say the parties have changed since the slavery era. They haven’t, the only thing that has changed is the dems views on social issues and they know that so they tried to make it look like the parties switched with the help of the media and they succeeded. Coming from a huge dem school, almost every self identifying democrat here says that republicans are better economically but because of social issues they wont vote for them. If we want votes we need to show that socially, we are basically the same as dems but 10 thousand times better economically, foreign policy wise, and national security wise. we cant do that until we get into the positions where we can show that and since young people dont vote in mid terms, I agree we need to focus on economics for the time being.

    11 years ago at 10:26 am
  8. BRING ME A PLEDGE

    This is going to be my first stab at making a comment not involving “pee in her butt” or “cool story bro,” so here goes nothing. I am going to try to invalidate the Democratic war cry of “the state needs to stay out of my bedroom,” so wish me luck. Do you like the Constitution? That badass document that has somehow turned our country into a Peyton Manning led Denver Broncos. Well in that Constitution there is this thing called the Tenth Amendment which reserves all powers to the states which was not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution. That means the states have power over the institution of marriage. Power over marriage includes things like tax breaks, benefits, etc. Its basically your tax money being redistributed to married couples. Don’t you hate it when people try to tell you what you can and cannot spend money on? Yea, so does that state. Allowing same-sex couples to marry results in more marriages, which will result in more taxes for you and I to cover the benefits I mentioned earlier. And we all know what the liberals love: more taxes and free handouts.
    To summarize: The liberals want the government to “stay out of their bedroom” by demanding the government recognize same-sex marriage and to pay them benefits (from our pockets) as well. So basically they want the government inside of more bedrooms, which makes sense because they love bending me over and railing me in the ass on April 15th.
    There is also a legal theory which says that once this becomes legal, the next thing to demand equal rights is polygamy. If this shit becomes legal it will reek havoc on our court systems when these crazy fucks divorce. Imagine being a judge trying to figure out proper asset division upon divorce when a your pledge bro wifed-up all 8 of his slampieces that night he blacked out in Vegas.
    Most importantly though, it is time to stop bitching about equal rights. This includes the race-baiters like Sharpton and Jackson as well as those annoying ass feminists. I could rant on those social issues for days, but I don’t want any chicks on facebook posting articles of women’s rights groups blasting TFM on my wall. If you are in America you have more rights than in any other shit-hole country on this planet. Quit bitching about more free handouts, be thankful for whatever rights you have, and go be a productive member of our capitalistic society so we can continue kicking ass. We might have a WWIII to prepare for, and I plan on remaining undefeated.

    11 years ago at 10:56 am
  9. DraperPryce

    Cuban is spot on. I’m a Rockefeller Republican that is absolutely sick of being in the same party as people like Sarah Palin. If Fox wants to help the GOP, they need to tell Mike Huckabee (among others) to either stop talking about gay marriage . . or leave. The American public has basically decided on that issue. If the GOP wants to stay relevant, it needs to lay out comprehensive plans on issues like global warming that don’t hurt business (and acknowledge it exists) and an alternative (or more likely, reform) for ObamaCare rather than just oppose opposition. Currently, the GOP really risks becoming just a protest vote when the Dems fuck up, instead of leading on issues. Bush 41 and Bob Dole must be disgusted.

    11 years ago at 3:30 pm