SEC Expansion: The Biggest Winners

The ink is finally dry. Two former Big XII members have set sail for calmer waters and a more fertile, prosperous territory. As of Sunday, July 1, Missouri and Texas A&M are officially members of the SEC. They have left the conference they called home since 1994 (Big XII play didn’t begin until 1996). It was a young conference with troubled relationships, uneven revenue distribution, pointed fingers and hurt feelings, but it was one with deep roots and storied rivalries. The Tigers had to wave goodbye to their nemesis, Kansas, and the Aggies to the University of Texas. The move had better be worth it for these programs to turn their backs on so much tradition, but seeing as it’s the SEC, it certainly seems like the right call.

Obviously this is a big moment for these universities. It’s akin to getting the call up from triple A to the bigs. With the step up in competition and notoriety, each program will enjoy the many fruits of their esteemed membership, but they will also face new challenges.

So, now that the SEC has officially expanded, let’s discuss who the biggest winners are…

Missouri and Texas A&M

These two schools are making out like bandits. This is an across-the-board upgrade for them both. They are set to pull in way more money in a conference that shares revenue equally. SEC trucks filled with cash are headed to Columbia and College Station as we speak. To the contrary, the Big XII practiced uneven revenue distribution based on several factors, and the University of Texas cornered the market there. That’s certainly more of a capitalistic approach, but conference unrest can be the result, which was clearly the case in the Big XII. The SEC puts a lot of stock in conference stability, and that’s a welcomed notion for the Tigers and Aggies. For two summers they’ve found themselves in the center of rumors and speculation about realignment. They even watched former conference members Colorado and Nebraska pack their shit and move out. The catalyst for this discord was, of course, the aforementioned uneven revenue distribution. But this mild annoyance turned into full-on turmoil with the creation of the Longhorn Network, which not only puts more money into the pockets of the Longhorns, but provides them with constant program promotion on the back of ESPN (even though no one can see that God forsaken channel yet).

Finally, and most importantly, the Aggies and Tigers are joining the premier football conference in all the land. The quality of football, the game day atmospheres, the passion of the fans… it’s all better in the SEC. The conference boasts the last six national championship trophies. That’s big boy football. Conversely, like an MLB pitcher during the pinnacle of the steroid era, the competition for these new members just went from tough to damn near hopeless. We’re talking about two programs that had little to no success in the weaker Big XII, and now they’ll be going up against the best in our nation’s power league. You can bet it will be ugly, at least for a few transitional years.

The SEC

Here’s exactly what the SEC is acquiring in Missouri and Texas A&M. The following are all-time statistics:

Missouri

  • .544 winning percentage
  • 0 national titles
  • 15 conference titles
  • 13 bowl wins

Texas A&M

  • .598 winning percentage
  • 1 national title (1939)
  • 18 conference titles
  • 14 bowl wins

Given these numbers, does the move to allow A&M and Mizzou into the conference appear to be football motivated? Couldn’t they have pursued more relevant or historically rich programs in their region? Programs like Florida State, Virginia Tech or Miami? If not, why did the SEC lock these programs down? Are they the chosen sacrificial lambs? It’s big business, driven by money. It’s simple really: the more eyeballs on SEC football, the more valuable their product is and the revenue will follow suit. Missouri and Texas A&M conveniently reside in big market areas. Missouri brings TV sets from St. Louis and Kansas City, and Texas A&M will get people tuning in from Houston as well as parts of San Antonio, Austin and Dallas.

The biggest winners, in my opinion, are the existing members of the Southeastern Conference, at least for the foreseeable future. These members will reap the monetary benefits of expanded markets. They will also find two teams on their schedule that pose little threat. Again, that last part could be temporary, shifts in conference and program strength are always in motion.

Beginning this fall, A&M and Missouri will start the treacherous journey from the new, vulnerable, clean-cut kids in Cell Block D to revered legitimate conference players. It’s going to be a long, tough ride that will probably leave each program begging for mercy at times. But hey… at least now they’re in the SEC.

Follow me on Twitter @RogerDornTFM

    1. Colton H Chambers

      of course.

      Now, if the SEC could bid a team in North Carolina and Virigina, then this could be a sure sign that the South might rise again.

      12 years ago at 4:27 pm
    2. jayhawk13

      I’m a KU fan and hate Mizzou but why do ignorant SEC fans think they will get their shit stomped in the SEC? Mizzou will go 8-4 or 9-3 every year just like they do virtually every year in Big 12. Sure they’ve had years going 7-5 but also one year going 11-2. They play in the SEC LEAST. All they have do is beat Georgia, lord knows an overrated team every year. Obviously Mizzou will get destroyed at home by Bama, but after that SEC homers are ridiculous if they believe Florida who couldn’t score on a high school team last year, USC with a hurt running back and no QB, and any of those other three teams UT UK and Vandy, who should probably start getting ready for ball season, could beat Mizzou. Mizzou is lucky they don’t have the powerful Miss St. and Miss on their schedule. The Sec has 3 good teams, one QB, and they all play in West

      12 years ago at 9:02 pm
    3. csh1858

      Mizzou is one of six teams in the BCS conferences to have won at least 8 games in each of the last 6 seasons. I’m sure they can win 9 games in 3 seasons.

      12 years ago at 6:46 pm
  1. NiceGuyPreston

    As a Big XII student I’m happy to two of the worst schools in our conference jump ship to get railed by the SEC. Hell, Texas and Oklahoma would get roughed up there. Have fun Mizzou and A&M.

    12 years ago at 11:13 am
    1. FarmFratter

      Yes by all means, please enjoy being one of the better teams in a dying conference. We appreciate your goodwill.

      12 years ago at 11:26 am
    2. Fraterick Southgate

      ^Oh Yeah, we’re dying. Replacing two teams who can’t win with two teams (WV, TCU) who actually have potential. Plus cocaine, too. Texas and OU wouldn’t do perfectly in the SEC, but they’d definitely be contenders. The SEC would look much better with them instead of Mizzou and A&M.

      12 years ago at 12:58 pm
    3. Greatest Bro on Turf

      You are fucking stupid if. You think winning programs in the Big East and Moutain West mean shit, let me put it in terms your horrible big 12 education could understand. When you play teams like little sisters of the poor U and premature childbirth college you have the ability to prepare for your big game be it Wisconsin or Clemson or LSU. If you think they will keep winning the way they were you need a fucking help.

      12 years ago at 7:59 pm
    4. AlphaPhiLovesButtpee

      ^ You sir have no right to call anyone stupid considering the abundance of spelling and punctuation errors in your tirade.

      12 years ago at 9:54 pm
  2. DoubleTap

    Does anyone else think the map of the divisions above is fucking stupid? Why not move Vandy to the West and Bama and Auburn to the East?

    12 years ago at 11:17 am
    1. FratSouthernStyle

      Why would the SEC cater to the needs of these two scrub new teams and forfeit hundred year old traditions and divisional rivalries?

      12 years ago at 11:36 am
    2. Vinny Chase

      ^^^^Why would you move Bama and Auburn to the East so they can’t play LSU and Arkansas every year? That’s just dumb. Makes the West race LSU vs Arkansas every year and loads up the East.

      12 years ago at 2:48 pm
  3. Rob Fox

    Teams from the Big 12 and SEC that Mizzou will be better than in football this year: Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Tennessee, Mississipi State, Ole Miss, Texas A&M, Iowa State, Baylor, Kansas State, kansas, and Texas Tech.

    Those are the teams I’m POSITIVE Mizzou will out perform. Schools like Florida and UT are too close to call right now, in my opinion. We’d be near the top of the league in the Big 12 this year and we’ll be surprising people in the SEC. We’re not going to win the conference, and it’d take a hell of a season just to win the SEC East, but to think we’re going to be a pushover is hilariously misinformed. I hope the SEC coaching staffs are that cocky too. I doubt it though.

    Oh and it’s us and Kentucky in basketball this year.

    12 years ago at 11:25 am
    1. TheFertileTurtle

      Tennessee is going to be out-fucking-standing this upcoming year. We’ve just had the worst luck with injuries and shit. But I hope ya’ll can kick Florida’s swampass.

      Go Vols

      12 years ago at 11:28 am
    2. DoubleTap

      Positive Mizzou will outperform Kansas State? It is not even close how much better KSU is than MU.

      12 years ago at 12:30 pm
    3. Fraterick Southgate

      KSU is definitely a possible force this year. I hate them, but Snyder is positively insane and he has an up and coming quarterback. I wouldn’t say favored over missouri, but an EXTREMELY dangerous sleeper game (Coming from an OU guy).

      12 years ago at 1:07 pm
    4. ReaganKA

      Bacon,
      There is a good chance that Vanderbilt, Tennessee, Mississippi State, and Texas A&M will out perform Missouri. Nobody from the SEC respects Missouri and nobody wants Missouri in our great conference. And of course nobody wants your GDI culture mixing with our southern football culture.

      12 years ago at 1:24 pm
    5. Frat_Fish_Repeat

      Enough bashing Mississippi State, the only teams that beat us were SEC teams, and damn good ones at that. All 6 teams ended up in the top 15 and 4 of them were in the top 10. So if you think Mizzou is going to come in and have their way with us like cheap date, you are sadly mistaken. The only Tigers that will have any respect in the SEC are Auburn and LSU. Welcome to the college football big leagues pledge.

      12 years ago at 2:29 pm
    6. Frat_Fish_Repeat

      I also agree with ReaganKA, the SEC has a proud sporting tradition legacy; whether it is ringing cowbells or watching a baseball game from the left field lounge at MSU, tailgating in the grove at Ole Miss, rolling the trees at Auburn, yelling RTR, the voodoo in Death Valley, or the Gator chomp in the swamp, our traditions are time honored and more than 1 is in the top ten things to do in college sports before you die.

      12 years ago at 2:40 pm
    7. AEKDBuffett

      Bacon, that’s a lot of talk from a fan of a historically mediocre football program to trash some of the most legendary programs in the sport (and Kentucky). I hope this season finally shows big talking Midwestern, Southwestern, and Pacific staters what SEC football really is. We aren’t the best just because we win the Championship, not that it hurts our argument much. We’re the best because even the lowest team in the conference on any given Saturday in the fall could give any other SEC team a good game, and could probably whip the everloving shit out of any team that doesn’t hail from this sacred ground shaded by Palmettos, Oaks, and Magnolias. Don’t worry about being better than your old conference rivals either. This is the SEC. You don’t need to think about them anymore. Real football is played South of the Mason-Dixon and East of the Mississippi River… and Kentucky plays some pretty great basketball. That being said, Go Tigers, and Gig’ Em. Welcome home.

      12 years ago at 2:52 pm
    8. ice cold frat

      Bacon, don’t you know? Past records are always indicative of the following years. Just ask Michigan.

      12 years ago at 5:40 pm
  4. American

    The Big XII went to shit when the Big 8 expanded to pick up the Texas schools. Missouri and A&M jumped ship because with Colorado and Nebraska leaving, it appeared the conference was crumbling apart. Can’t blame either school for wanting stability

    12 years ago at 12:00 pm
  5. dye_fratting

    There are a few major things you are leaving out.

    While i know football is at the forefront of the decision – if you look at all around sports rankings (The directors cup) A&M is consistantly around the top ten, with the only SEC school ahead of it as Florida.

    Also A&M is in a league above almost all of the SEC (exceptions being Vandy and Florida(ish)) in academics – if anything, aggies are worried about their reputation being dragged down to the levels of the Alabamas, Mississippi States of the world.

    Lastly, SEC schools dont need to have the air that they are saving A&M from some sort of monetary dispair. A&M is one of the top ten schools in the nation in terms of wealth. They have an endowment fund of over 7 BILLION. That is more than double second place vandy and about 7 times the majority of the other SEC schools.

    With that said, Im pumped for the move and think it will be a great partnership, but if A&M were a pledge, it would be that one pledge that the actives cant wait to initiate because they know he’ll be a credit to them all.

    again….7 billion

    12 years ago at 12:32 pm
    1. Joran van der Frat

      Football and baseball are the only college sports that matter, chief. And don’t even try to bring that african tree ball garbage into this discussion.

      12 years ago at 12:56 pm
    2. Shooter McGavin says

      I think it’s more along the lines of, the actives can’t wait to haze the fuck out of this pledge cause none of the actives like him.

      12 years ago at 12:57 pm
    3. ReaganKA

      Georgia isn’t a good school? You just lost a lot of credibility because of your ignorance. Alabama and Auburn are also ranked higher by the US News than Missouri. Missouri and Texas A&M are in the AAU because of their research and other factors but you should actually look at the college rankings before you say that Texas AM is with the like of vanderbilt.

      12 years ago at 3:07 pm
      1. AlphaPhiLovesButtpee

        Texas A&M blows. Anyone who compares it to Vanderbilt has gone full retard.

        12 years ago at 9:57 pm
    4. Fraterick Southgate

      I like how you didn’t defend the actual argument with Georgia in that post at all. ^

      12 years ago at 3:14 pm
    5. Diplofratic Immunity

      US News creates this list by sending a letter to a dean from each college and asks the to rank other colleges. It’s a very corrupt and unreliable source.

      12 years ago at 7:17 am
  6. Bro Jackson

    Predictions for this year:
    Mizzou goes 8-4 (And yes, they will beat Georgia. Mark Richt’s slow starts combined with a secondary made of ghost men playing Mizzou’s super spread in front of a crowd that has had a boner for that game since February does not bode well for UGA)
    A&M goes 7-5
    Derek Dooley gets canned and enrolls at a clown college.

    12 years ago at 1:08 pm
  7. Fraterick Southgate

    Another brave (not really) prediction: OU wins the Big 12, and I get insanely drunk in Dallas’ West End and possibly end up in jail the night before OU/TX.

    Kansas State and West Virginia also impress.

    12 years ago at 1:12 pm