SEC Expansion: The Biggest Winners

The ink is finally dry. Two former Big XII members have set sail for calmer waters and a more fertile, prosperous territory. As of Sunday, July 1, Missouri and Texas A&M are officially members of the SEC. They have left the conference they called home since 1994 (Big XII play didn’t begin until 1996). It was a young conference with troubled relationships, uneven revenue distribution, pointed fingers and hurt feelings, but it was one with deep roots and storied rivalries. The Tigers had to wave goodbye to their nemesis, Kansas, and the Aggies to the University of Texas. The move had better be worth it for these programs to turn their backs on so much tradition, but seeing as it’s the SEC, it certainly seems like the right call.

Obviously this is a big moment for these universities. It’s akin to getting the call up from triple A to the bigs. With the step up in competition and notoriety, each program will enjoy the many fruits of their esteemed membership, but they will also face new challenges.

So, now that the SEC has officially expanded, let’s discuss who the biggest winners are…

Missouri and Texas A&M

These two schools are making out like bandits. This is an across-the-board upgrade for them both. They are set to pull in way more money in a conference that shares revenue equally. SEC trucks filled with cash are headed to Columbia and College Station as we speak. To the contrary, the Big XII practiced uneven revenue distribution based on several factors, and the University of Texas cornered the market there. That’s certainly more of a capitalistic approach, but conference unrest can be the result, which was clearly the case in the Big XII. The SEC puts a lot of stock in conference stability, and that’s a welcomed notion for the Tigers and Aggies. For two summers they’ve found themselves in the center of rumors and speculation about realignment. They even watched former conference members Colorado and Nebraska pack their shit and move out. The catalyst for this discord was, of course, the aforementioned uneven revenue distribution. But this mild annoyance turned into full-on turmoil with the creation of the Longhorn Network, which not only puts more money into the pockets of the Longhorns, but provides them with constant program promotion on the back of ESPN (even though no one can see that God forsaken channel yet).

Finally, and most importantly, the Aggies and Tigers are joining the premier football conference in all the land. The quality of football, the game day atmospheres, the passion of the fans… it’s all better in the SEC. The conference boasts the last six national championship trophies. That’s big boy football. Conversely, like an MLB pitcher during the pinnacle of the steroid era, the competition for these new members just went from tough to damn near hopeless. We’re talking about two programs that had little to no success in the weaker Big XII, and now they’ll be going up against the best in our nation’s power league. You can bet it will be ugly, at least for a few transitional years.

The SEC

Here’s exactly what the SEC is acquiring in Missouri and Texas A&M. The following are all-time statistics:

Missouri

  • .544 winning percentage
  • 0 national titles
  • 15 conference titles
  • 13 bowl wins

Texas A&M

  • .598 winning percentage
  • 1 national title (1939)
  • 18 conference titles
  • 14 bowl wins

Given these numbers, does the move to allow A&M and Mizzou into the conference appear to be football motivated? Couldn’t they have pursued more relevant or historically rich programs in their region? Programs like Florida State, Virginia Tech or Miami? If not, why did the SEC lock these programs down? Are they the chosen sacrificial lambs? It’s big business, driven by money. It’s simple really: the more eyeballs on SEC football, the more valuable their product is and the revenue will follow suit. Missouri and Texas A&M conveniently reside in big market areas. Missouri brings TV sets from St. Louis and Kansas City, and Texas A&M will get people tuning in from Houston as well as parts of San Antonio, Austin and Dallas.

The biggest winners, in my opinion, are the existing members of the Southeastern Conference, at least for the foreseeable future. These members will reap the monetary benefits of expanded markets. They will also find two teams on their schedule that pose little threat. Again, that last part could be temporary, shifts in conference and program strength are always in motion.

Beginning this fall, A&M and Missouri will start the treacherous journey from the new, vulnerable, clean-cut kids in Cell Block D to revered legitimate conference players. It’s going to be a long, tough ride that will probably leave each program begging for mercy at times. But hey… at least now they’re in the SEC.

Follow me on Twitter @RogerDornTFM

  1. Fraterick Southgate

    I’m betting OU pulls through and wins the Big 12 again. KSU and WV will impress though. And most importantly, I’ll get blackout at Dallas’ West End and wake up somewhere weird the morning of OU/TX.

    12 years ago at 1:15 pm
    1. RupertPupkin

      The West End? It never fails to amaze how Oklahoma trash is so excited about coming to a city as cool as Dallas to party at a Joe’s Fucking Crab Shack and Spaghetti Warehouse. No wonder y’all think Bricktown in OKC is such a cool place.

      12 years ago at 10:18 am
  2. OXinyourBox

    It’s a shame that the SEC didn’t make a run at Virginia Tech. They would have gotten a better market in Virginia (12th most populated state in US, largest state without a NFL team) and the DC market. Va Tech is unquestionably a better football program than A&M and Mizzou. Also, Frank Beamer is a legendary southern college football coach that would have fit in perfectly with the other SEC coaches.

    12 years ago at 1:23 pm
    1. OXinyourBox

      Also, the only programs that are more prestigious (in terms of football) than Va Tech in the SEC are Alabama, LSU, Florida and Auburn.

      12 years ago at 1:27 pm
    2. colonial ft soldier

      Wrong. Tennessee is the 2nd winningest program in SEC history, and Georgia is always in the mix. Arkansas has a great history as well. Va Tech wasn’t even relevant until the 90’s.

      12 years ago at 1:41 pm
    3. OXinyourBox

      I only care about the past 20 years (as do most recruits) when talking about which programs are better…it’s like with nba basketball, nobody gives a shit about what happen before Jordan’s bulls.

      Great for Tennessee that they won a bunch of games when our dads went to college, but you ask the average college football fan if va tech or Tennessee is better football program, they would say va tech by a wide margin…the only people who would say otherwise are Tennessee fans (and maybe UVA fans)…plus va tech SMASHED Tennessee in the peach bowl a couple of years ago.

      UGA and Ark are probably in the same ballpark as tech so I could see where you’re coming from but i would respectfully disagree with you that they’re better programs.

      12 years ago at 2:42 pm
    4. Will Fratchamp

      OXinyourBox- you’ve made a good argument for including Va Tech in the SEC and I’m sure the conference has already attempted to pursue the Hokies. However, here are some rebuttals to consider:

      1. Va Tech has stated in the past they have no interest in joining the SEC. Their reason? Well remember when Miami left the Big East, Va Tech wanted out as well. Since UVA and the ACC helped rescue the program from the Big East fiasco, Va Tech has felt beholden to the conference.

      2. Yes, having Va Tech would strengthen the DC market, however it wouldn’t be much of an addition. Despite having 2 ACC teams, Virginia is still big into SEC football. It’s like saying the SEC would add the North Carolina market by adding UNC, Wake, Duke, or NC State. Adding a state like Virginia or North Carolina is simply overkill, but adding markets like Texas and Missouri further expands the SEC’s reach into Big 12 territory. The ACC sucks. I used to live in DC and no one gave a shit about Maryland football. They only care about the Redskins.

      12 years ago at 10:52 am
    5. OXinyourBox

      @Will Fratchamp, I agree with that Virginia Tech “owes” the ACC but since it was such a bitch for them to get in the conference in the first place, they shouldn’t feel any remorse in leaving the conference. It’s different if one of the “Tobacco Road” schools leave because they are the reason why ACC is a worthwhile conference in the first place. If they didn’t want you in the conference to begin with, I say fuck ’em and make the best decision for your own school.

      I’m not saying bringing in A&M and Mizzou into the SEC were bad moves. But for me personally, I’d rather have the flagship program in VA than the “little brother” program in TX. A&M will always be in the shadow of UT and they have to compete with Texas Tech, TCU and UH. Nobody cares about Maryland football in DC because Maryland football fucking sucks.

      You’re right, the ACC fucking sucks…out of the schools that matter, two of them haven’t been good in ten years (Miami & FSU), two of them choke every year (VT and Clemson), one is fucked for a really long time (UNC) and the other runs the least fan-friendly offense in college football (Georgia Tech).

      12 years ago at 7:34 pm
  3. anon7472974648

    Want to talk about actual dollars? I’m shocked no other conference has found a way to replicate how the Big Ten gets and shares revenues. Which is why I wouldn’t call Mizzou a “winner” in this (more like a push), because they would’ve gotten a hell of a lot more money if the Big Ten didn’t reject their application.

    12 years ago at 1:30 pm
  4. CountNotCunt

    Regardless of the fact that A&M brings in a huge revenue, it doesn’t take away the fact that they will have a rude awakening when tossed in the ring with teams like Alabama, LSU, and all of the other powerhouses of the SEC whos speedy offenses and tough defenses will put their running game to shame. Especially with the fact that they lose their steam after half, and lost their QB, they will definitely be going no where. Mizzou has a much better chance at performing well in the SEC. They have a QB that can pass and run which will suits them well along with their wide spread offense. They won’t be outdoing any big teams this upcoming season, but I see them as a future threat to some of the top tier schools in the conference.

    12 years ago at 1:55 pm
    1. you_mad_breaux

      Give Mizzou 4 years and they’ll be a contender… The next three are going to be fucking ugly for them though

      12 years ago at 3:17 pm
    2. Hoss

      It is hit or miss on this type of argument. Hell, I can’t fathom why people won’t give A&M some shit since we beat them the past two years.

      12 years ago at 9:59 pm
  5. Fratting_Hard

    When the SEC expands to 16 teams are they gonna add VT, FSU, Clemson, Miami, or UNC?

    12 years ago at 2:09 pm
    1. Fraterick Southgate

      From a recruiting standpoint, FSU should be the top goal. UNC adds nothing for football. Clemson is a close second. Miami hasn’t ben relevant in ages.

      12 years ago at 2:11 pm
    2. OXinyourBox

      If you’re looking for new markets that would increase the revenue streams for the SEC, you want to go for colleges in North Carolina and Virginia (from the geographic standpoint, it makes the most sense). There’s no point in going for FSU, Clemson or Miami- The SEC already have their footprints in Florida and South Carolina, you’re not going to maximize viewers if you take either three of the colleges in. (FYI, In a dream scenario you would add Texas and Oklahoma but there’s not a snowball’s chance in hell of that happening).

      The schools that would be in play IMHO are Va Tech, UVA, NC State, UNC and Duke. You can automatically throw out Duke and UNC mainly because they’re basketball schools.

      UVA would be a solid option but nobody really cares about the football team and it’s been mediocre for decades (Colin Cowherd does a more entertaining rundown of their program http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RidU6ILUQNE).

      Your best options are Virginia Tech and NC State. You capture the major markets in NC and VA and Virginia Tech would make the SEC a stronger conference (and most of the college football fans in NC are Wolfpack fans anyway).

      12 years ago at 5:53 pm
    3. 14pearlsNsquirrels

      FSU and VT would open up greater football recruiting potential for all SEC schools. UNC, NCState, and Clemson wouldn’t bring any worthwhile draws in that regard… and UVA should just never be on the table. I like what Mike London is doing for them, but that doesn’t need to cross over to the SEC.
      Personally, I would love to see VT + FSU to the SEC or even VT + Clemson. Tech has a great DC fan base which is obviously a profitable location.
      But when all is said and done, the ACC buyout is too large for VT… It would take a hefty miracle for VT to make a move.

      12 years ago at 1:27 pm
  6. southern1gentleman

    Florida:
    – .638 winning percentage
    – 3 national championships
    – 8 Conference titles

    compared to A&M statistics, that’s not saying much

    Also props to A&M’s new freshman QB getting arrested for being in a fight at a bar and presenting 2 different fake ID’s to police

    12 years ago at 2:25 pm
  7. FratBakke

    As a whiny Razorback fan I’m obligated to complain about you not mentioning Arkansas.

    Remember us Alabama and LSU?
    Remember when we had those fun times ranked 1, 2, and 3?
    Hey, where are you going?!
    Guys??

    12 years ago at 3:12 pm
  8. ice cold frat

    I come before you today sickened. Disgusted. I look back and I see our greatest achievements, the victory of frat over geed and hipster. I look forward and I see the ultimate testament to Fraternity life and the TFTC attitude. But no, it shall not be. I am surrounded by traitors and cowards.
    Did you all forget when that son of a fucking bitch Dorn, with gleeful orgasmic joy, posted that column berating your college’s football program for their recruiting achievements? Perhaps when he invented the infamous “Dorning”? Oh but if only he was a mere asshole tyrant constantly trying to prove himself, he is also a corrupt, biased, immoral bastard who should have no place on the TFM staff.
    Intern, what did Dorn promise you? Will TFM now be immune to shitty trolls, as opposed to the main recipient of them? Is frat forever secure now? Lifetime servitude with you as lifetime bitch, was that the deal you goddamn traitor? I’m sure StuffFratsLike and Sterling Cooper, the since befallen contributor, will be happy to play along.
    Bacon, what say you? Coward, you and your followers shall burn in hell. For a team that once stood against tyranny, you now join your enemy? What say you RageTheory? Will you permit these senseless language censors and oppression of free speech and Fraternity life as we know it?
    To the people of TFM, your choice has been made. You are all worthless fucking goddamn cowards. Little we know the Ultimate Frat Move, the famous unposted butt-pee picture, is but a farce and false god created by the demon lord himself, DORN. He keeps you ens.laved with thoughts of greatness while undermining your ability to frat hard. You choose Dorn’s fa.ggotry; bowing down to him because it’s easier, less scary than my call to fight? You’d rather be s.laves, bitches, whores, playthings, and possession, rather than risk your try-hard version of frat? Fuck you all to goddamn hell. Fucking erase this piece of shit fucking shell of a site, it doesn’t deserve the name of the noble Total Frat Move which stood against geed and liberalism. Fucking run to Bacon and hide under his g.ayfriendly skirt like a true TFM coward.
    Who built TFM? I did! Who rallied the world to arms in the greatest single effort this goddamn place has ever seen? I did! I am the true and righteous hero of TFM! Without me there is only darkness, evil, and Dorn. I am everything we supposedly wanted to save about this site; the last shining beacon of hope. I am TFM!

    12 years ago at 5:32 pm
    1. Fraterick Southgate

      ^ Extreme props for not getting that huge post stuck in the “Waiting to be moderated” Purgatory. I sometimes can’t say three normal unoffensive sentences without getting fucked into moderationland.

      12 years ago at 5:43 pm