The Inside Scoop On How The University Of Michigan’s DKE Chapter Is Currently Getting Screwed Over
Yesterday, we published a story about how the University of Michigan DKE Chapter was kicked off campus for “merging” with SIG, a rogue fraternity at the U of M. We didn’t have much to go off of besides what had already been reported on.
I feel it’s important that both sides of this debacle be told by the media in this situation, though, and after getting information from a member of the DKE chapter, I feel prepared to tell their story. Here’s their side of things.
The Backstory
This whole ordeal centers around a group of 29 sophomores who denounced their membership in the rogue fraternity SIG in hopes of joining an IFC fraternity this fall. Here is the story of these sophomores, as told in a letter they sent to the Interfraternity Council after DKE was kicked off campus.
To the University of Michigan Interfraternity Council:
In the fall of 2014, we arrived on this campus as freshmen and were interested in rushing a fraternity. Like most incoming freshmen, we did not fully understand what the Interfraternity Council was and we did not know the difference between an “off campus” and “on campus” fraternity.
During rush, as you all know, you are persuaded and enticed by members to join their brotherhood. In an effort to gain targeted rushees, sometimes the full truths of each fraternities’ situation do not come out. We joined “SIG” without a complete understanding of their situation and without a full grasp on the negative impact it would have on our college experience.
In our first semester we went through a pledge process. Similar to any IFC fraternity the main point of this process was to learn the meaning of brotherhood and form relationships with the other members of our group.
Once unified and after having a semester at Michigan under our belt, we sat down and discussed if we wanted to continue as “SIG.” We all realized that being in this organization automatically came with a poor reputation that none of us deserved. Although we had no hospital visits, hazing scandals or sexual assault allegations in our tenure as members last year, the track record of “SIG” that preceded us inherently labeled us as villains associated with those claims.
We unanimously decided that we did not want to be associated with that reputation and as a result, we began taking steps to disassociate ourselves from “SIG.” In January of 2015, at the beginning of our second semester, we contacted Tau Epsilon Phi and asked them if our group could colonize a chapter at Michigan. After meeting with us, TEP approved of our group and was ecstatic at the opportunity to open a chapter at Michigan. We then contacted Devin Berghost, IFC Advisor and Alex Krupiak, IFC President and asked for their guidance. We were told that it would not be possible because of our affiliation with “SIG,” even though we were clear that we were trying to disaffiliate and start a fraternity that could be under the control of the IFC.
Although disheartened, we still hoped to secede from “SIG” and the reputation we received with it. Our only option left was to enter IFC rush again as sophomores in hope to place ourselves within the IFC system and clear whatever “SIG” label we once had.
We approached Delta Kappa Epsilon and explained that we went through a pledge term together and had gained a group of brothers in the process. DKE, who values brotherhood like every fraternity should, sympathized with us. They agreed we could rush their fraternity and that they would not split up a tightly knit group of best friends that had already spent a year of college together.
In return we vowed to leave all “SIG” traditions and labels in the past, which we were more than happy to do. We assured them that the last thing we wanted was the negative portrayal of us as individuals that our membership in “SIG” had given us.
Although the Greek community has not yet completely buried our “SIG” label because it is still being discussed, we hope this letter will help reassure you that we wish to disaffiliate from all things “SIG” and have been working to do so for over a semester. We would just like to rush, as it is common for sophomores to do.
Sincerely,
A group of Sophomores
It’s pretty clear from this letter that these students do not want to be members of SIG. They didn’t know what they got into, and, once they figured it out, tried everything they could to get out of it. Heck, they even tried to put in the immense amount of legwork it takes to found a new fraternity on campus, something that would normally have any Greek Life Coordinator drenching his tighty-whities. But just because they were in a rogue fraternity, they were banned from affiliating with Greek Life, banned from founding a new fraternity, and banned from rushing another fraternity. Because obviously the best way to make sure your campus’ rogue fraternity problem goes away is to create barriers to exiting rogue fraternities.
The Wednesday, September 23rd Meeting
On September 23rd, at the IFC weekly meeting, a motion was made to kick DKE off campus for associating with SIG. The motion received a second and the case was presented before the Interfraternity Council, needing a 2/3 vote of the IFC chapter presidents to pass.
The case presented against DKE was that they were attempting to merge with SIG. During the proceedings, allegations against SIG were brought up to paint a negative picture of the fraternity.
From Michigan DKE President Evan Field:
During Wednesday’s meeting a university employee, read aloud a list of allegations from the past 10 years against the former organization known as Sig, they were trying to draw a link between our organization and actions that took place in a different organization while I was in elementary school. None of the events described took place while any of the 29 sophomores we want to bring in were members of this organization. The attacks on these gentlemen’s character were unfair and borderline slanderous.
Field defended SIG by pointing out how during the 29 sophomores’ tenure as SIGs, there were no incidents that brought negative attention to the group. Field made a point to make it clear that this was not a “merger” between the two groups. Which is true, as DKE is maintaining all of their own ritual, branding, and rights of membership. It isn’t called a merger when a group of 90+ DKEs take on a group of 29 unaffiliated dudes – it’s called rush. Field also pointed out that SIG had raised $100,000+ for MRelay, more than any on-campus fraternity or sorority in 2015.
Field won over the presidents, and the motion failed. DKE was warned, however, that if they did not drop their “affiliation” with SIG, they would be voted on again at the next meeting.
The Wednesday, September 30th Meeting
The fraternity decided to continue associating themselves with the 29 sophomores, so when Field, a former member of SIG, and a representative from DKE nationals (it’s important to note that the Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity’s national organization has supported and continues to support the Michigan DKE chapter throughout this ordeal, even continuing to recognize them as a chapter despite their current off-campus status) all showed up to the IFC weekly meeting, the motion was voted upon once again. This time, it passed.
Citing freedom of association, DKE believes that IFC has no right to prevent them from rushing and initiating these men just because they used to be members of SIG.
From Michigan DKE President Evan Field:
As a chapter it is our right to choose our members based upon the values of our organization. The issue at hand is whether or not the Interfraternity Council can dictate who can become members of our organization. This freedom of association is protected under the first amendment of the United States Constitution and we believe the IFC has over stepped their bounds and has set a dangerous precedent for all fraternities. A public university IFC does not, nor should it ever, have the power or the right to tell a chapter, which individuals are or are not eligible for membership in their brotherhood.
The Appeal
Field was not pleased with the decision, and has announced that the fraternity will be appealing the decision.
We the brothers of Delta Kappa Epsilon are tremendously disappointed with the result of last week’s Interfraternity council meeting. It was, and still is, our belief that the right to choose our own members is a crucial aspect of self governance. We will appeal this decision and believe that we have a strong case. The fact that the IFC came to this decision without a precipitating incident is extremely disheartening and calls into question the motives and values of the member chapters.
One of the last fraternities to get kicked off campus at the University of Michigan got kicked off for causing $430,000 worth of damage at a ski resort. DKE got kicked off for recruiting men whose values aligned with their organization’s. The easiest way to highlight the absurdity of this situation for me is this:
TL;DR: University of Michigan IFC kicks DKE off campus to set precedent that rogue fraternities will not be tolerated, thus creating a new rogue fraternity.
Solid reasoning right there. Should hopefully all be cleared up once the appeals process starts up and DKE’s name is cleared.
Stay strong, Michigan DKEs..
Image via Michigan DKE

It’s pretty cool that DKE nationals has their backs.
10 years ago at 4:56 pmsomething you don’t see often or at all now
10 years ago at 5:21 pmOur national president is one of the best in the game. Goes to bat for his chapters instead of buckling under the PC bullshit.
10 years ago at 5:29 pmAbsolutely. This is the way the system should work. Nice to see Nationals standing up to defend a chapter. Nationals from all fraternities should take note of this, especially with all the scrutiny that is being placed on chapters on every campus throughout the nation. Not going down without a fight.
10 years ago at 4:00 pmWell ain’t that some shit.
10 years ago at 4:57 pmIn my fraternity, we cannot bid men who have initiated into another social fraternity or group, period. While SIG may not be officially recognized, if they obtained brother status then it gets sketchy to me.
10 years ago at 5:04 pmMy fraternity allows exceptions if the members are supported by nationals, so I’m assuming DKE might have a similar rule. But, I wouldn’t know because I don’t automatically assume every fraternity has the exact same rules as each other.
10 years ago at 5:30 pmThese kids weren’t sponsored by a national organization. They’re only brothers of their local organization.
10 years ago at 5:50 pmWasn’t assuming, just trying to bring gauge the room. Good point.
10 years ago at 11:10 pmWhy does IFC have to fuck everything up? Even our nationals tells us to screw them on a regular basis.
10 years ago at 5:05 pmIt’s the best thing about being a Kappa Sig. Fuck IFC.
10 years ago at 5:09 pmOur ARM literally told us that during Rush at meeting a few weeks ago. And even if IFC wants to pull something, we aren’t even affiliated in the national IFC, hence more reason to tell them to fuck off.
10 years ago at 5:11 pmwouldn’t say it’s the best thing but it’s a definite bonus
10 years ago at 5:22 pmAs a current greek life student at the University of Michigan I just wanted to clarify a few innacuracies:
10 years ago at 12:45 am1. Every single “SIG” was 100% aware that they where off campus before they rushed. SIG recruits by word of mouth, so they all must have known brothers beforehand
2. SIG NEVER, and I emphasize NEVER participated in the rush process. DKE voted a majority decision on the merger months ago before rush
3. DKE ONLY voted to merge with SIG so their social calendar would be better(SIG is known as a higher tier rogue fraternity)
4.DKE bairley had any control of their rush OWN rush process. 90% of the kids bidded where up to SIG
5. SIG is 100% in charge of DKE’s social calendar
6. The ONLY reason the SIG kids wanted to merge was because the university began cracking down on their hidden mixers.
7. The DKE brothers have been working on appeal very hard the last week, they’ve been trying to hit every angle to make this merger seem sensible.
8. One brother in DKE has a close friend that authors for TFM, practically begging him to post their article in hopes to have the IFC overturn their decision. IFC gave them a warning and they declined to kick out SIG, now they should deal with ramifications just like any other greek organization would.
*From all of the innacuracies of this article, I felt that I HAD to post this.
Even if thats all true, you’re the poison greek life doesn’t need. Why not let these guys have a chance, even if they’re only doing it to excel their social stance. It seems they like each other enough to come together, so why not let them push towards a new brotherhood. Greek Life is under attack everywhere and Greek chapters need to support each other instead of trying to throw other chapters under the bus because they lied or didn’t follow the rules. No matter how much you hate or don’t respect another chapter in your greek community; in this age you should never wish for them to get kicked off.
TLDR: You fucking suck and are achieving nothing. Long Live Greek Life
10 years ago at 1:00 amWolverine19 sums it up the true situation quite well. To respond to you and everyone else thinking of “giving these kids a chance”, SIG has an incredibly bad hazing and general record of defying reasonable standards set out by the IFC/UM. Their claim that SIG’s violations all happened during their time in “elementary school” is absurd as they have had multiple violations and illegal things happen during my undergrad time here.
The response from IFC/other chapter presidents is simply this: Why should we associate ourselves, already under intense scrutiny from the “ski trip” fiasco/general Greek life bashing along with a president who just yesterday spoke about the “eventual demise of Greek Life”, and add a possibly huge liability with a group of kids associated with a group proven to do things opposite of the true values of Greek life. So let them do their thing on their own watch, but when they possibly fuck up, they won’t drag us all down with them…This one-sided smear campaign of IFC is pretty ridiculous, even by TFM’s standards.
10 years ago at 9:52 amYou and Wolverine both sound like whiny little pussies. I was a former Vice President & IFC President. Under my tenure we did kick 2 fraternities off campus (only after their nationals dropped their charter first), and in response we immediately began the process to open 3 new Fraternity charters in Fall 2012. I’m proud to say that 2 of those 3 colonies are now nationally & University recognized chapters.
Furthermore, while a large portion of those members of the 2 expelled charters disregarded their status and acted “rogue”. there were numerous Freshman, and one Sophomore (who after his Freshman year disaffiliated) contact our IFC exec board asking for a chance to rush again, and fully gain a true Fraternity experience. Obviously not everyone on our IFC board agreed, but the majority decided to let these gentleman go through a peer and advisory review board before they were allowed to enter the rush period again.
In the end. of those disaffiliated members, many joined the new colonies, the sophomore even joined my chapter, and excelled as a Brother for us, socially and academically.
You and the rest of your peers that aren’t even giving these gentlemen a chance just come off as salty little bitches. This is some shit I would expect from a Sorority, not a community of supposed gentlemen.
TL;DR: Rudegaze and Wolverine sound like jealous ex-girlfriends. Give these guys a chance to prove their serious they want a legitimate change. Possibly make these “SIGS” go through a peer review first, but give them a shot.
10 years ago at 12:47 pmYou PC bro?
10 years ago at 1:05 amThis kid is either a GDI or is in the shittiest fraternity
10 years ago at 5:54 amSpells “barely” with an I, says “where” instead of “were”, has 19 in his name. I’m gonna go ahead and say you’re a freshman, and therefore have no right to create an opinion on the matter. I’m sure your IFC cock gobbling big just convinced you that what was going on was just. Take a lap, pledge.
10 years ago at 8:35 amTLDR: SIG’s social calendar is great. The crackdown makes it worse, and their loss is your gain. Respect the hustle, but stop bitching.
10 years ago at 11:24 amMichigan’s IFC clearly didn’t think through the benefits of such a merger.
10 years ago at 2:44 pm1. One would presume that IFC would like to see SIG eliminated or weakened. A merger would potentially eliminate or substantially weaken what would remain of the SIG rogue fraternity. A win for the IFC.
2. It would place 29 former SIG members under the DKE banner and all that goes along with it, including rules against hazing. Presumably the DKE chapter would be under greater scrutiny to ensure the merger didn’t increase hazing, given the fact that their national organization is located in the same city as the chapter and probably has more oversight over their Michigan chapter than any other organization. A win for the IFC.
3. Currently, SIG is operating without regard to IFC rules. The best way to get them to follow the IFC rules is to allow them to merge with a chapter that is currently subject to the same. A win for the IFC.
Wolverine 19,
I am a current junior in DKE at UMich and it is clear, based off of your supposed corrections, that you know very little of the situation. I would go as far as to hypothesize that you are in either TKE, Chi Phi, or AEPi; as those are the main fraternities who felt threatened by Deke’s rise to prominence on campus. Past the fact that rival fraternities such as those aforementioned were so scared of Deke that IFC abused power to remove us as a threat to the social and rush of those rivals, you clearly know nothing about what you are talking about. Using the word merger is inaccurate, this was more of an acquisition. We brought in the most recent pledge class from SIG of only 29 guys. I was never a part of SIG and yet I was a rush chair and heavily involved in a rush process that flourished through the cooperation of a mixed group of rush chairs, both former SIGs and old Dekes (so all Dekes). Sig is not 100% in charge of our social calendar. It is true that the former members of SIG brought valuable social connections with them, but we have used these social connections through the hard work of our own social chairs along with the guidance of the guys who used to be a part of SIG. Before you start ignorantly slandering another fraternity, ask yourself: am I doing this because I care about greek life or because I am a selfish pussy who can’t deal with social competition.
10 years ago at 3:53 pmYou can have nationals on your side but not IFC and then vice a versa. Gotta love it.
10 years ago at 5:13 pmThanks for the other side of the story. As a Michigan alumnus I initially backed our IFC, but hearing the other side makes me question the decision. While I definitely think that if you join another IFC fraternity, you shouldn’t be able to pledge or join another, the fact that these SIG sophomores seem to have ben misled gives them a strong case for this new/joint pledging.
10 years ago at 5:20 pmBeing able to rush “again” should be a chapter decision. IFC’s influence should end with the bylaws’ requirements for eligibility.
10 years ago at 7:01 pmOn principle I agree with you, but under most circumstances I’d greatly question someone rushing their second fraternity after having been initiated into another.
10 years ago at 9:54 pmNormally I’d agree but why can’t the chapter choose this for themselves?
10 years ago at 1:07 amWhat kind of spineless pussies would vote to take another chapter off campus for this?
10 years ago at 5:27 pmOn the one hand, ignorance is no excuse and the pledges should have known that SIG was a rogue fraternity. On the other hand, the pledges disaffiliated with SIG willingly, so they weren’t “merging” with anyone. They had no different status than if they were freshmen or upperclass rushees. Further, they were cleared by DKE to go through IFC rush (and presumably they were registered with IFC to rush in the first place).
So not only has IFC fucked over DKE, it has implicitly admitted to creating this situation.
10 years ago at 5:54 pmSome points that weren’t mentioned here that slightly alter the perspective:
-SIG’s hazing is over the top here at U of M and, honestly, straight up dangerous. I have plenty of friends who directly know kids in SIG who have (idiotically) told stories of chainsawing metal poles next to pledges to shower them with sparks, locking them in the basement covered in vodka with the windows open during winter, and more of the sort.
-Every single kid initiated into SIG knew full well it was off campus and what that meant. The majority of each pledge class is recruited by their friends currently in SIG (in order to survive off campus you have to go by word of mouth), and even the rest know something’s up by the fact that SIG isn’t at all present in the IFC mass meeting which literally everyone knows about.
In short, SIG is an example of what not to do, especially if you’re going rogue, and the sophomore class knew that all throughout pledging.
With all this said, the sophomore class was also never truly part of a national organization, so I do believe DKE should be allowed to do what they want with them at their own discretion. It might full well be true that they want to abandon the sketchiness of SIG in favor of a real fraternity experience, and I think giving them the benefit of the doubt isn’t a stretch.
The thing is, though, DKE was planning on initiating them off the spot instead of putting them through a formal pledge process.
Don’t really know the specifics of the entirety of the decision, but just trying to make you guys more aware of the situation. It’s a clusterfuck all around.
10 years ago at 6:59 pmOmicron!
10 years ago at 7:43 pm