The Problem With The 4 Team Playoff

 

The news is in. College football fans nationwide have been waiting for a playoff since before the BCS era, and they finally have it. Well… kind of. Yesterday it became official that, starting in 2014, four teams will be selected by committee to play in a semi-final bracket to determine which team is the “true” national champion of Division 1 college football. Factors considered by committee for determining these four teams include strength of schedule, wins and losses, head-to-head matchups, and conference championships. Although it is huge news that there have been steps to alleviate the problems that a one vs. two BCS matchup has caused, the idea that this four-team playoff is any semblance of a real solution is actually quite a stretch. I’m not saying the “playoff” isn’t better than letting computers and pollsters determine who will duke it out in the BCS National Championship. It is certainly more effective than the absolute mess that was letting the AP and the Coaches’ Polls determine who was the champion by vote, which ended up with split-championships and a lack of closure on the season. Despite all that, there are still a few reasons why this should not be considered the ultimate “solution.”

Most of the problems stem from the fact that it will only be four teams selected to participate in the playoff. The reason the BCS has taken so much criticism has to do with the odd man out when it comes time to put two teams in a final game. Given the amount of parity during the regular season, the assumption that there is going to be less of an outcry from the fifth team out than the third team is shaky at best. We don’t exactly know how the committee will end up choosing participants and seeds if an undefeated non-AQ team is being weighed against a powerhouse that lost early but climbed the rankings through a tough conference schedule. The same scenario that once happened between 2 and 3/4/5 will now be happening between the fourth ranked team and the few ranked below them.

When Alabama and LSU met for the second time in the national championship game last year, ratings were considerably lower than the previous championship game. Regardless of the fact that most people believed they were the two best teams in the country, no one wanted to see an in-conference rematch. This is important because ratings obviously equal money, and money is a prominent THE motivating factor in the process of figuring out the new playoff structure. The higher-ups were obviously not concerned with appearing monetarily driven when they told the world that the national championship game would go to the highest bidding venue. They clearly want this sporting event to have the potential to be as big as the Super Bowl, and guess what? It does.

Now, this isn’t necessarily bad, and I’m sure Jerry Jones is already signing the check and making the banners for the first game because…let’s be real…that motherfucker would pay to have Arkansas in the final game every year if it was allowed, but this could ultimately hurt the process of selecting the four teams if money is clearly a driving force in the matter. The problem is once again rooted in the size of the bracket. At some point the committee is going to have two teams, one from a conference that already has a team in the mix, thus posing the potential for a rematch, and one from a non-AQ conference that doesn’t travel well compared to a powerhouse. Who do you pick? On one hand you have a team that will travel well but the rematch might not draw as much national attention, on the other you have a team that will provide a more compelling matchup for the ratings but doesn’t have a fan base large enough to generate an amount of money to appease the people who own the venues and are doing the bidding. Granted the venue will have been booked years in advance of the committee’s playoff decision, but will that venue be hesitant to bid again if the committee makes decisions that don’t benefit the venue? Either way, someone’s wallet is taking a hit in a scenario like that.

The real problem here is that four teams are not enough to solve any logistical problem. Whether that problem is criticism of the playoff system and its decision committee or a problem with revenue not reaching its full potential, more teams will eventually have to be added into the bracket in order to placate the lamenting fans and ensure that the people boosting money into the series are happy with their return. Eight teams would definitely be more realistic of an approach considering the recent number of non-AQ teams that have cracked the top ten, and a lot of analysts seem to be happy with a quarter-final bracket.

I, however, fucking hate sports analysts, so I decided to throw in my idea of a perfect playoff scenario. Even if it were eight teams I’m sure a couple lower teams would bitch in order to keep the tradition alive of moaning about not getting into the college football elite club. I don’t think anyone outside of the top 8 should be considered a national champion, let alone the top 10. However, the way rankings work, 7-10 would bicker like children until the end of time making their claim that they deserve to make the final cut. So, I propose that much like the NCAA basketball tournament, two play-in games between seven/nine and eight/ten are implemented to determine who get the last two seeds. This way the entire top ten is allowed to play on the field in order to determine a true national champion. I could go on forever about venue possibilities and combinations, but that would make all of you reading this with your phone on the toilet bitch way too much in the comment section.

The reality of this brand new playoff system is that it isn’t really that much like a playoff at all. It offers no closure, and no real satisfaction for the fans. It’s like the BCS saw us starving for playoff sustenance, determined that we were hungry, and tossed us a fucking chicken wing for all of us to share like a pledge class during hell week. We’re still going to think someone is getting more of a share of that fucking wing than they deserve while the BCS thinks we are going to be elated and grateful that they tossed us a half-inch bone that doesn’t solve any problems. So, until the playoff becomes more encompassing, I wouldn’t be so quick to call the four-team bracket anything close to a solution.

  1. SNU

    Just shut the fuck up and be thankful that we no longer have computers deciding who are the two best teams in the country.

    12 years ago at 6:39 pm
    1. Frat Blue Ribbon

      You know what’s worse than 2 SEC teams inexplicably being chosen as the best in the country? 4 SEC teams.

      12 years ago at 9:46 pm
    2. TheFertileTurtle

      I would love to see Tennessee whoop the same ass over and over so I have no problems with it. UNLESS, it’s not Tennessee playing. Then that’s horseshit

      12 years ago at 2:09 pm
  2. Joran van der Frat

    This is just the first baby step towards a real playoff. In the future, this is what should happen (ideally):
    1) Conference expansion continues its current course of expansion/realignment until we have four 16-team superconferences. (Pac-12 and SEC each add four teams, the Big 10 splits with half of the remaining schools joining the Big East and other half joining the Big 12).
    2) Division winners play each other in the conference championships which double as the first round of the playoffs.
    3) Conference champs are seeded for the second round of the playoffs by selection committee rank.
    4) Single elimination until a champ is crowned.
    5) Cap FBS at 64 schools. The minor conferences can go fuck themselves. If they want a championship they can form their own league between FBS and FCS.

    12 years ago at 6:41 pm
    1. Joran van der Frat

      VT, Miami, and FSU could join the Big East. The rest of the ACC is a joke.

      12 years ago at 8:22 pm
    2. Joran van der Frat

      Clemson was good last season. For the first time in like 20 years. I wouldn’t exactly call them a college football dynasty.

      12 years ago at 9:58 pm
    3. anon7472974648

      Completely disagree with point 1. For example, why would the Big Ten agree to spliting up not only the best revenue sharing system, but also sacrifice the academic and research prestige and funding it gets? And even if the Big Ten were to stay together, I wouldn’t want to see it diluted athletically or academically by the likes of Kansas, ISU, etc.

      Then again, this is coming from someone who agrees with Bobby Bowden-I’m completely fine with the preBCS way of doing things, so feel free to disregard everything I just said.

      12 years ago at 10:37 pm
    4. jmt

      Joran van der Frat obviously knows nothing about college football if he’s trying to relegate Clemson.

      12 years ago at 8:07 am
  3. PIKEpledge

    Well this will be just like the college world series. The whole SEC will be in it or pretty close to it. Also those saying teams will be worn down and tired, the only teams that play anyone worth a shit week in and week out will be SEC teams so teams from any other conference should not have to worry about being tired bc they don’t play defense. Non SEC teams will not being able to pull that excuse.

    12 years ago at 7:11 pm
    1. Hazing Actives

      I swear to everything holy I will skull fuck you if you speak again, pledge.

      12 years ago at 8:47 am
    2. TheFertileTurtle

      I mean…it’s true. SEC teams play much harder schedules simply because almost all of the in-conference games are really tough

      12 years ago at 2:11 pm
    3. Whites_R_Better

      Yeah so a winning SEC school will stomp the shit outta any big 10, big 12, PAC 12, and non-aq team. Ergo, the last 6 national champions.

      12 years ago at 4:25 pm
  4. Frat So Hard U

    The BigTen and its butt buddy ESPN are gonna whine like babies when they are the 5th team.

    Initially I hated this idea, but I really like it now. Keeps the intensity of the regular season, which is what makes this sport so incredible, yet adds even more excitement and doesn’t extent the grueling season too much for the “student-athlete.” And also, if their is a controversial team getting in (like a 0 or 1 loss non-power conf. team), they can be exposed if they get railed and in the following years that will be a factor in consideration.

    12 years ago at 7:21 pm
  5. LetTheBigDawgFrat

    The problem is that the SEC is going to fill the spots in the bracket and the other conference won’t ever get a chance

    12 years ago at 7:32 pm
    1. TKEpledge

      Yeah totally broseph, ’cause the Dawgs have had everyone terrified for the past few years man.

      12 years ago at 7:35 pm
    2. PIKEpledge

      ^ you’re forgetting bama, LSU, Arkansas, and yes, Georgia on any given year can go far, not to mention Florida but it’ll be a while before they’re good again. Your statement was fucking retarded you low tier pledge.

      12 years ago at 8:54 pm
    3. jmt

      ^^^Not to mention the Dawgs will be a top 10 team preseason with one of the best defenses in the country.

      12 years ago at 8:08 am
    4. TheFertileTurtle

      Not to mention Tennessee will be one of, if not the, top teams in the SEC.

      12 years ago at 2:12 pm
    5. TheFertileTurtle

      It’s not debatable. My lust and passion blind my realistic views on life though.

      12 years ago at 5:39 pm
  6. williamfratner916

    There’s no such thing as a perfect scenario in college football because there are too many teams in the league. That’s just the way it is, deal with it. That said, I think it eventually needs to be an 8 team format. With a selection committee picking the teams, you can have a 3 or 4 seed not make the playoffs while a 5 or 6 seed does. There would be way less controversy with an 8 team playoff and every school that really deserves a shot would be in it and the regular season would still be damn important. Nobody ever complained that the #9 seed was deserving of a championship.

    12 years ago at 8:47 pm
  7. Broble1956

    I think the 4 team “solution” is in actuality just a way to further separate the big name teams an conferences from the rest. My point will be proven when we are seeing a team from the BigTen, SEC, PAC 10, and Big XII filling the four slots year in and year out. In no way am I implying that in some years these big conference teams will not be the obvious choices, but more often than not I think it will be suspect. One caveat, if and when Notre Dame pulls their heads out of their asses and starts playing football again, all they will have to do is crack the top 8 to get a bid.

    12 years ago at 9:51 pm
  8. GrizzlyFratGreen

    ‎10 teams. 2 wild card spots with 8 teams that have the 2 best teams in the conference. For example LSU and BAMA from the SEC. Texas and OU from the big 12 and so forth. You use your BCS bowls to host the games with the 2 best teams to play for the Champ. (Top 4 teams get a bye).

    12 years ago at 1:44 am