The SEC And Texas A&M Are Trying To Duck A Bowl Matchup With Texas
Considering the source, there’s a pretty decent reason to remain skeptical, but according to Horns Digest’s Chip Brown, Texas A&M and the SEC at large are actively trying to avoid a University of Texas versus Texas A&M bowl game. He cites two sources close to the situation who said, “SEC officials have indicated to bowls with SEC and Big 12 tie-ins that the SEC won’t support a Texas vs. Texas A&M postseason matchup. In short, A&M has too much to lose from a potential loss.”
Now, I wanted to couch all of this by acknowledging that Chip Brown is not always the most reliable source of information. In fact, there’s a whole Tumblr page dedicated to Chip Brown being wrong, which is called Jizzmop for reasons that I care not to investigate. However, it’s pretty well accepted that no journalist is infallible, and Chip Brown, for all his journalistic faults, has one of the best and deepest lists of contacts for sources in college football.
But let’s look at the situation objectively. The fact is, A&M does have a lot more to lose in that scenario. No one is under the illusion that A&M is a good team this year, but the SEC in general has a stake in this as well. The SEC’s dominance is predicated on its ability to write off losses to teams in the conference as “quality losses.” Every loss outside of the conference weakens that construct. Granted, it’s not like A&M is going to reject any bowl matchup with a non-conference team, but playing an old rival like Texas makes that game automatically high-profile. Despite the fact that Texas’s season has been disappointing at best and abysmal at worst, Charlie Strong has the boys down in Austin playing much better now than they were at the beginning of the season. They would much rather risk losing to a competitive Pac-12 or Big Ten team than a weakened version of a perennial powerhouse. It just wouldn’t be a good look for them. Plus, wouldn’t you be scared of playing a team that last beat you with Case McCoy at quarterback?
As an ardent anti-fan of both schools, I personally would love nothing more than for this matchup to happen..
[via Scout.com]
Image via YouTube
This isn’t the forums.
11 years ago at 3:11 pmDumbest accusation I’ve heard all week. A&M has been actively trying to make something happen with Texas who has refused any arrangements that would end with an A&M vs UT football game. Wish it would happen, but ain’t gonna. Not because “A&M is avoiding the game” but because the longhorns are, and have been avoiding a matchup for years now.
11 years ago at 3:20 pmI will take laps to speak the truth:
11 years ago at 3:36 pmWe just love football. We will play any team, any where, in any weather.
Unless you’re Florida, which hasn’t played a non-conference game outside of the state since 1985 and ducks Miami every chance they get.
11 years ago at 4:30 pmThe SEC already owns Ohio State. Why would we duck the Redhawks?
11 years ago at 5:17 pmBut they played GA Southern last year…
11 years ago at 9:17 pmYou honestly think Miami of Ohio has a chance?
11 years ago at 9:31 pmPre-rivalry week, SEC power 5 matchups next year include LSU/Syracuse, S.Carolina/UNC, Tennessee/Oklahoma, aTm/Arizona St, Auburn/Louisvillle, Arkansas/Texas Tech, and Alabama/Wisconsin. UK, Miss St, Ole Miss, Florida, Georgia, Mizzou, and Vandy did not schedule a power 5 opponent next year and of the teams that did, the only juggernaut opponent is Oklahoma and arguably Wisconsin, and you didn’t see a Juggernaut SEC team schedule Oklahoma did you? It’s a fucking joke. LSU scheduled Syracuse? Mizzou scheduled Uconn? What the fuck are they getting out of that? Without matching up against a tough power 5 team early in the season, the preseason rankings hold too much weight. The SEC west can thank SC for being overrated. #9 South Carolina played cross conference and lost to aTm who took over the #9 ranking and preceded to lose to 3 SEC west teams spreading that ranking wealth. Once the SEC west held those high rankings, it didn’t matter if they lost to each other because they were all top ten teams and didn’t play out of conference power houses.
Also,
Bowling Green > Indiana > Mizzou > Texas A&M > Auburn > Ole Miss > Alabama
Bowling Green > Alabama
11 years ago at 7:39 pmStop it with your analytical logic God damnit!!
11 years ago at 11:03 pmOoooh I like this game.
UNI > NDSU > ISU > Iowa > Indiana > Mizzou > TAMu > Barn > Ole Miss > Bama
Therefore The University of Northern Iowa > Bama
11 years ago at 9:20 pmHey dumbass. I guess Florida state doesn’t count as good team? Because Florida plays them every year
11 years ago at 11:16 pmI said pre-rivalry week for a reason. The rankings are skewed throughout the year due to the lack of out of conference play in the beginning of the year. Come rivalry week it’s too late for accurate rankings.
11 years ago at 7:17 pmIf Texas beats them, then ESPN will talk about how good Texas really is and how underrated they were this year. Consequently, Texas A&M will move up 6 spots after the loss.
11 years ago at 9:35 amIf this game happens, the stakes would be incredibly high, which is why many don’t want it. If A&M wins, they would validate their claim of “we run this state”. Recruits would shift from various schools to the one school in state who holds the title of being in the SEC and managed to take down UT. They would no longer be stuck with the 27-25 loss from 2011. However, an A&M loss would shift recuits from A&M to UT and other schools. Players like Malik Jefferson could easily decommit from one to join the other. It’s extremely high-risk high-reward. I am not sure either school wants to play either other when neither one has proved much this season.
11 years ago at 10:40 am