You might want to actually read the opinion. The case wasn’t decided on the merits; the Court simply ruled that the proposed class was too big to be certified. Each individual plaintiff can still bring a case or they can organize into smaller, similarly situated classes.
The merit of the case is not the important aspect in this instance. Allowing certification would have set a dangerous and unconstitutional precedent. I’m entirely in favor of protecting individual rights, but the class amounted to a group of menopausal thieves hoping for a payday at shareholder expense.
I actually did read this story, as well as NBC not using “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance and apologizing on FOXnews, before I saw it on here. I was being sarcastic. Fucking moron.
TSM, actually. The problem with reading just the news story of an opinion is that, most of the time, the writer has no idea what the hell he or she is talking about. My initial comment was to the person who posted the TFM originally. The case wasn’t actually dismissed on its merits and the court did not address the gender discrimination aspect of it. However, obviously it’s an important statement when it comes to the rights of corporations and big businesses. And THAT is a TFM.
Thinking “WalMart” and “TFM” belong together in a sentence that doesn’t include the words “stock” or “liquidate”. NF.
14 years ago at 8:53 pmWhy even look at the FOXnews homepage when I can get all my news on TFM?
14 years ago at 9:04 pm^this.
14 years ago at 6:32 amYou might want to actually read the opinion. The case wasn’t decided on the merits; the Court simply ruled that the proposed class was too big to be certified. Each individual plaintiff can still bring a case or they can organize into smaller, similarly situated classes.
14 years ago at 10:36 pm^actually knowing what’s going on in the world rather then just reading headlines, TFM.
14 years ago at 9:30 amThe merit of the case is not the important aspect in this instance. Allowing certification would have set a dangerous and unconstitutional precedent. I’m entirely in favor of protecting individual rights, but the class amounted to a group of menopausal thieves hoping for a payday at shareholder expense.
14 years ago at 9:54 amI actually did read this story, as well as NBC not using “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance and apologizing on FOXnews, before I saw it on here. I was being sarcastic. Fucking moron.
14 years ago at 9:55 amTSM, actually. The problem with reading just the news story of an opinion is that, most of the time, the writer has no idea what the hell he or she is talking about. My initial comment was to the person who posted the TFM originally. The case wasn’t actually dismissed on its merits and the court did not address the gender discrimination aspect of it. However, obviously it’s an important statement when it comes to the rights of corporations and big businesses. And THAT is a TFM.
14 years ago at 10:50 am