Verizon CEO Scorches Bernie Sanders In Open Letter
On Monday in Buffalo, Bernie Sanders stood before a crowd and said Verizon Wireless “in a given year has not paid a nickel in taxes.” Old age is clearly getting to Bernie, because that’s not true. The statement, along with Sanders’ other views with his “moral economy,” didn’t sit well with Verizon CEO, Lowell McAdam. So he took to LinkedIn to skewer the old man.
His first accusation – that Verizon doesn’t pay its fair share of taxes – is just plain wrong. As our financial statements clearly show, we’ve paid more than $15.6 billion in taxes over the last two years – that’s a 35% tax rate in 2015, for anyone who’s counting. We’ve laid out the facts repeatedly and did so again yesterday (see “Sen. Sanders needs to get his facts straight” at Verizon.com/about/news). The senator has started to fudge his language – talking of taxes not paid in some unspecified “given year” – but that doesn’t make his contention any less false.
Sen. Sanders also claims that Verizon doesn’t use its profits to benefit America. Again, a look at the facts says otherwise. In the last two years, Verizon has invested some $35 billion in infrastructure — virtually all of it in the U.S. — and paid out more than $16 billion in dividends to the millions of average Americans who invest in our stock. In Sanders’s home state of Vermont alone, Verizon has invested more than $16 million in plant and equipment and pays close to $42 million a year to vendors and suppliers, many of them small and medium-sized businesses. Just yesterday, we announced a $300 million investment to bring fiber to the city of Boston, which will make it one of the most technologically advanced cities in the nation and expand broadband access for its residents. Boston’s Mayor Walsh is partnering with us on this initiative, calling it crucial for providing the foundation for future technology growth. We’re making significant investments in New York City, Philadelphia and other metro areas throughout our wireline footprint.
Verizon is one of the top 3 capital investors in all corporate America. Our investment has built wireless and fiber networks that deliver high-quality services, create high-tech jobs and form the infrastructure for the innovation economy of the 21st century.
I challenge Sen. Sanders to show me a company that’s done more to invest in America than Verizon.
Sen. Sanders has also involved himself in our on-going negotiations with the labor unions representing some 36,000 communications workers in our wireline business, a bargaining process that has been going on since last June. At a labor convention in Philadelphia last week, Sanders claimed that Verizon is demanding that workers take pay cuts and reduce health benefits or see their jobs shipped overseas.
Again, Sen. Sanders is wrong on the facts. More egregiously, he oversimplifies the complex forces operating in today’s technologically advanced and hyper-competitive economy.
Our objective in these negotiations is to preserve good jobs with competitive wages and excellent benefits while addressing the needs of our ever-changing business. All of our contract proposals currently on the table include wage increases, generous 401(k) matches and continued pension benefits. Contrary to Sen. Sanders’s contention, our proposals do not call for mass layoffs or shipping jobs overseas. Rather, we’ve asked for more flexibility in routing calls and consolidating some of our call centers, some of which employ a handful of people. We would continue to provide health insurance for active and retired associates and their dependents, but we have proposed some common-sense reforms to rein in the cost of these plans, which in 2015 ran to $1.4 billion a year for these represented employees, retirees and dependents. In fact, our healthcare plans – which provide access to medical, prescription drug, dental and vision coverage – are robust enough to make us subject to the “Cadillac tax” on excessive plans as defined in the Affordable Healthcare Act … the very law Sen. Sanders supported and voted for.
To read the full post, click here.
Kinda funny that Bernie talks about taxes with the lower class, thinking he can get them riled up on the rich. When the reality is that he wants to raise taxes on everyone, including the super poor. Someone needs to put Bernie in a home. Verizon’s CEO hit the nail on the head with his response..
[via LinkedIn]
Image via YouTube
slightly off topic – but i noticed Bernie is trying to make college free for all, can someone help me understamd this? it seems like if its free and available to everyone that it then becomes meaningless. as in, colleged looked great on a resume for our parents generation. but in our generation we need college and a second language. if it becomes free for all wont the next step be getting a masters degree to make your resume pop?
9 years ago at 3:07 pmYeah no shit dude.. If college is free then the value of a degree goes down significantly
9 years ago at 3:21 pmyouve essentially restated my poorly worded and spelled comment. but I guess my real question would be why would anyone support that? or what is the up side? sure everyone gets educated…but…great for everyone I guess? why do i care if everyone gets educated if now i have to pay for a masters?
9 years ago at 3:27 pmI guess I will take this one. Keep in mind I am not endorsing any views just what an argument for free college might look like.
The argument that the value of a degree will go down so therefore we should not do it is only valid if you believe there is no intrinsic value to education, or if so said intrinsic value of education is less than the cost of the government program. In theory a more highly educated person will be more intelligent and therefore be able to contribute to the economy in a more substantial way. This means if you were to invest in so-called “human capital” then that capital would be able to produce more than they would have before. When they produce more GDP, and contribute to our educational stock, this in theory helps everyone in the economy. Another argument is that not everyone has a chance to go to college because of the prohibitive cost and therefore they should be afforded that opportunity because they should have just as much of a right to education, and its perks, as anyone else.
I personally do not believe in the notion that a degree is just something to put on your resume, and that it does not help you be a more productive person. I think that I am much more prepared socially, intellectually, and emotionally to contribute to the economy thanks to my college education. Now, is the intrinsic value of what I learned worth 100k? That is a tougher question, and a cost benefit analysis you should do in order to have a better grasp on the issue.
9 years ago at 5:36 pmwell put. and yes everyone furthing their education does sound good in theory. but i guess in my view it would play out: college becomes accessible , now people get masters to stay competitive, therefore starting a career around 27-30, now everyone has spent 10 years in school that are typically spent laying foundation for a career. i guess in essence it almost seems counter productive if the majority of society is constantly focusing on becoming more educated to one day be a productive member of society rather than focusing on actually producing.
9 years ago at 8:01 pmIt already is down significantly. Why the hell else would I be getting an MBA instead of being out and starting to make money? Colleges themselves have already lowered admission standards significantly, and more free college than we already have will dilute it even more.
This is why you now need a specific degree. Its also why more organizations are starting to care about GPAs. For our parents, “A bachelor’s in English or History” was good enough to secure a sound job. Now you need a degree in Economics from a big school with a 3.5 or above. Not because the former option is less respectable, but because the market is saturated and there needs to be some weeding out somehow.
9 years ago at 3:49 pmYou should definitely go out and still make your money before getting an MBA. Typically you should be in the workforce 3-5 years before getting your MBA because any business school worth a damn won’t accept you unless you do.
9 years ago at 5:38 pmFar more people already apply to colleges than those colleges can admit (check out acceptance rates). If college tuition became free, colleges wouldn’t automatically have bigger classrooms and more seats. The only thing that would change is there would be more applicants, raising the standards needed to get into said college.
9 years ago at 5:01 pmI wonder if Verizon’s reply only talks about the year 2015 because from 2008-2013 they actaully had a negative tax rate of 2%, meaning they received money from the government rather than paying a nickel in taxes.
http://ctj.org/corporatetaxdodgers/tax-dodgers.php?id=273
9 years ago at 4:27 pmPlease tell me why it’d be better to let big companies go bankrupt and let all their employees lose their jobs than to give them bail outs.
9 years ago at 8:11 amHail Bernie, King of the Jews!
9 years ago at 5:30 pmHe is as old as Jesus.
9 years ago at 7:39 amhttp://www.thetribunists.com or follow on twitter @ForTheBoys_Blog .. for more interesting college humor.
9 years ago at 8:54 pmFor those still feeling the Bern, you’re welcome. Early Christmas gift. Enjoy seeing your money leave faster than your slam after a rigorous 2 minute 4th quarter bedroom drive.
http://election2016.taxpolicycenter.org/2016/03/25/voxs-new-presidential-tax-calculator/
9 years ago at 11:11 pmYou are all spoiled ignorant brats. Experience hardship and you’ll know why he fights for equality. If daddy pays for all your stuff then you don’t have a say in anything when it comes to finances or taxes. Bernie fights for those who struggle through poverty growing up and then entering a world rigged against them no matter how much effort you put forth. So unless you pay for your own stuff and got that job all by yourself with out the help of daddy stop acting like you know anything about anything.
9 years ago at 4:49 amI’ve bet you’ve been through the wringer. I think everyone would love to hear about your personal hardships and how Bernie is the second coming of Jesus you fucking teacup.
9 years ago at 8:13 amYou stupid fucking SJW. I am sure you haven’t experienced shit. I am sorry you have never been relevant in your life. Being a Bernie Sanders supporter isn’t going to change that fact. The fact that you support him means you haven’t worked for shit (because he is going to raise taxes through the roof) or you don’t understand how an economy works. Hopefully, you move to Venezuela, Greece or Spain you fucking dunce.
9 years ago at 6:49 pm“He’s successful and I’m not! That’s wrong! He needs to be heavily taxed!”
9 years ago at 9:32 am-Liberals