Why The SEC Is Bullshit

Screen Shot 2014-08-06 at 2.10.14 PM

If any of you southerners came here hoping that this was going to be an excoriation of the way that the Securities Exchange Commission operates, you’re in for a world of disappointment. The SEC I’m talking about here is, indeed, the Southeastern Conference, and specifically the cloud of fuckery surrounding it when it comes to football. So strap yourselves in, Tigers, Gators, Bulldogs, and every moron who’s ever yelled “Roll Tahd!” because it’s going to get ugly. For all you guys outside the bottom right of our fair country, grab some popcorn and enjoy. I’m about to piss off half the TFM readership in one column. This should be fun.

Let’s start with how the polling system is biased. Most people will claim that preseason polling is useless and has no real bearing on the game. This is certainly true if you look at polls as indicators of how teams will shake out in the season. However, they’re extremely important in terms of maintaining a ranking. See, it’s much harder to climb the polls as the season goes on if you were underrated going in. Conversely, if you start in the top 10 and play in the SEC, you have to REALLY shit the bed to drop out of the rankings. It’s because the conference itself is set up to allow that.

The SEC is almost like a commune in the way that it mutually weakens itself in order to raise up the whole. (That’s right, SEC fans. I just compared your conference to a hippie, communist retreat.) See, the conference realizes that if it only plays a minimal number of games against the teams that make it up and schedules only powderpuff teams as its non-conference opponents, it can preserve the “competitive integrity” of the conference. It’s easy to write off a loss as acceptable when it’s against “yet another powerhouse SEC team.” You’ll have teams end up with 9-3 and 8-4 records that still easily rank in the top 25, which is ridiculous, given that half of their wins are against garbage teams and their three losses are to “premier” teams within their own conference. The only reason that they’re considered premier is because they started that way in the first place. It’s like a snake eating its own tail, except the tail is a dick, and the snake’s mouth is every ESPN mouthpiece paid to laud the SEC’s deified status.

As of the last decade or so, the SEC has also built its reputation as a defensive powerhouse. No matter who shows up at an SEC team’s doorstep, or how complex that team’s offense, its defense is too overpowering to handle. The SEC’s championship run from 2006 to 2012 was unprecedented and seems to bear this out, right? I’ll admit, it’s definitely impressive, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves. First of all, it’s not everyone else’s damn fault that THE Ohio State shit the bed–twice–because they’re fucking overrated and play nobody and yet still get the benefit of the polls. Then you have the year Oklahoma got thumped by Florida, which happened to be the year of the controversial three-way tie between OU, Texas, and Texas Tech–the latter two teams were certainly more prepared to face the Tebow-led Gators. Then Alabama beat Texas after Colt McCoy went down with an injury, and with the way that game looked, only the most delusional Roll Tahder would believe that ‘Bama could have pulled that one out if McCoy had stayed healthy. Then Auburn had the miracle drive against Oregon, where they were bailed out by a couple inches of air between Michael Dyer’s knee and the ground. Then Alabama played LSU, which was a win-win for the SEC, in spite of the fact that neither team could score a fucking touchdown. And that’s not even talking about the egregious exclusion of Oklahoma State–its offense would have torn both of those vaunted defenses to shreds.

How do I know that? Because Texas A&M and Missouri have shattered this idea that SEC defenses are unassailable. They’re unassailable, because prior to those two schools’ inclusion in the conference, SEC teams couldn’t pass to save their lives. They acted like ground and pound was their preferred strategy, and not simply a product of the fact that they couldn’t get a real quarterback to save their lives. A&M beat Alabama in Tuscaloosa its first year in the conference, and Missouri won the East its second season in. Their combined record is 35-15 since joining the SEC. Let’s also not forget that neither team was particularly dominant in the Big 12, either. Perhaps the proof is that outside offenses are actually very well suited to beat SEC defenses, provided they have the time to adjust. One game with no previous playing experience versus each other does not proof of superiority make.

But at least the SEC is an NFL talent-producing powerhouse, right? Since the 2007 draft (which mostly means the recruiting class of 2003) there have been only 21 schools that had more than 25 NFL players. Five of them are SEC teams. Impressive. Oh, and five of them are ACC teams. Hmm. Oh wait–the Big Ten has five teams on that list, too. Weird.

Thankfully, it looks like all of this is changing for the better. Oklahoma stomped Alabama in their bowl game last year. Naturally, since Oklahoma is returning its quarterback and most of its starters–while ‘Bama lost a slew of its best players, including its four-year starting quarterback–OU will be ranked higher than Alabama, and Alabama will be appropriately placed in the preseason polls.

Oh wait, Alabama’s ranked No. 2 somehow? And Georgia is 12, even after going 8-5 last year and losing Aaron Murray?

Same bullshit, different year.

Fuck the SEC.

Image via Twitter

  1. frathardplayhardwvu

    So when Auburn won the NC after starting the season very low in the rankings, that fits into your statement of “it’s much harder to climb the polls as the season goes on”?

    10 years ago at 5:33 pm
  2. Shairz

    Fuck the SEC. It’s a bullshit conference where the big teams play shitty little ones their whole season. PAC-12 is on the rise people, a true conference with tough schedules

    10 years ago at 5:58 pm
  3. Cockyforlife

    These guys who wrote the article are crayon-eaters. Not surprising. Why is the SEC king?? Firstly, when the SEC won seven straight Natty championships, with the exception of Bama/LSU (and I agree it should’ve been Okie St/LSU) the SEC has had to win the game. Every time the SEC team did. And of course, excuses are being made about a guy almost being down or Colt McCoy getting injured, but that’s part of the game, and as for Colt McCoy, offense wasn’t Texas’s problem in that game. It was defense. Bama scored enough points to beat Texas with or without McCoy, and the backup (Garrett Gilbert) actually played well. Excuses excuses. The SEC was 6-0 vs everyone else in the title game.

    One main reason the SEC always has so many teams that start the season ranked high is based purely on talent on hand. Look at the recruiting rankings. For example, last year South Carolina finished 16th in the nation in recruiting, but that was only good enough for 8th in the SEC. Look at this year. Currently, four of the top five teams in recruiting rankings are SEC schools. When you continually collect the best talent in the country out of high school, win most of your bowls, and beat the other conferences head-up most of the time, you get the benefit of the doubt when it comes to rankings.

    Another point they conveniently leave out is NFL talent that has been on SEC rosters. They bring up the fact that only five SEC schools have 25 or more NFL players, while the Big 10 and ACC also share that same mark. What they fail to mention is how many other SEC schools have more players in the NFL than the bottom-feeding teams in the mentioned conferences. Oh, and also they set the mark at 25. Look at how many NFL players LSU, Alabama, and Georgia for example have playing on Sundays. To make my point, last year the ACC tied for second with 30 players drafted. The SEC had 63 players drafted, as the West had 33 and the East tied with the ACC for 30. Yes, the SEC is king. It isn’t a conspiracy.

    Oh, and they also mention how A&M and Mizzou came to the SEC and put up great offensive numbers. Firstly, A&M did it with an innovative coach and one of the best college QB’s ever. Mizzou did nothing their first year, but the SEC had a mass exodus of defensive players leave for the NFL, so last season Mizzou took advantage, and played good defense in their own right. To prove my point, Oklahoma’s 2008 offense set national records, but Florida limited them to 14 points in the Natty title game. And that sorry A&M team who was so-called not an elite Big 12 school waxed OU’s ass 41-13 in the Cotton Bowl with a pretty good QB named Manziel who happened to not arrive until they came to the SEC.

    The SEC is and will be king for the near future, and add $40 million in revenue for each team courtesy of the SEC network and that gap will only get bigger.
    6 mins · Like · 1

    10 years ago at 6:25 pm
    1. TheCamBrady

      If any intelligent human being just read this comment, then they would easily understand that SEC is still king and rightfully the most dominant.

      10 years ago at 11:24 pm
  4. FoolishTadpole

    You guys obviously don’t know much football….. Id stick to your “frat life”

    10 years ago at 6:32 pm
  5. madhatle

    They played some tough teams in that 06-2012 run, but they still won all of those title games. The only reason the SEC would be overrated is because they’re in the south and southerners love to let you know about it a little too often. But when you win, you can talk shit.

    10 years ago at 7:23 pm
  6. A_Aron12

    I’m just going to say the only relevant conferences are the Big 12, and the SEC.

    10 years ago at 7:47 pm
    1. Jack Blackout

      Big 12 is behind the Pac-12, Big 10, and ACC, but sure, whatever feels right up in your little brain. Go for it.

      10 years ago at 7:57 pm
  7. JoshLW

    He makes the assumption that OKST would have destroyed LSU or Bama’s defense because “TAMU and Mizzou came into the SEC and did it.” 2008 OU came into the National Title game vs UF and had one the most historic offenses avg 51 points and were held to 14 points. He can only make this assumption to help “prove” his point the “SEC is bullshit.”

    10 years ago at 8:14 pm
  8. Al Pacino

    I give respect to the SEC when it comes to football, it just is annoying when regular students or greeks in the SEC brag about how their school is superior mainly because of football, as if any school in the SEC or in the deep south for that matter is remotely difficult to get into. And no I’m not a northerner for most of you so quick to pull the compass trigger.. I’m from Virginia

    10 years ago at 8:58 pm