hillary clinton

Democrats Are Freaking Out Because Technically Hillary Could Still Be Named President

hillary clinton

A Change.org petition has been circulating the more liberal regions of the internet (Jezebel, FemmersOnly.com chatrooms, your liberal aunt’s hemp knitting club’s Facebook page) and causing a bigger commotion than the contents of Anthony Weiner’s email inbox and boxer briefs combined. It’s called “Electoral College: Make Hillary Clinton President on December 19,” and here’s what it has to say.

From Change.org:

On December 19, the Electors of the Electoral College will cast their ballots. If they all vote the way their states voted, Donald Trump will win. However, they can vote for Hillary Clinton if they choose. Even in states where that is not allowed, their vote would still be counted, they would simply pay a small fine – which we can be sure Clinton supporters will be glad to pay!

Essentially, the petition is calling for electoral college members in red states to disregard their pledged Trump votes and change them over to Hillary votes — a process known as “faithless electing.” If enough electoral collegians elect to be faithless electors, Hillary could, in theory, get the 270 electoral votes necessary to secure the presidency.

The petition has been endorsed by such high profile celebs as Lady Gaga, P!nk, and Sia, which is surprising to me. Not because I thought them to lean differently from a political standpoint, but because up until now I thought they were all the same person wearing different wigs. That’s legitimately what I thought the song “Perfect Illusion” was about; how them appearing to be three separate singers is a masterful trompe-l’œil (shoutout to the Westworld homies).

I’m going to let you down easy, people who believe what this petition is calling for might actually happen: you’re fighting an uphill battle, except instead of a hill, it’s a butte. You’re essentially a dog who wants to go for a walk sweetly pawing at the door in an attempt to open it as if that’s how doors work. Also, your owner’s dead and that door is never going to open again unless it’s animal control stopping by to stick you in a crate and ship you off to the incinerator. You also have Parvo.

I hope I let you down easy enough; I really did try.

[via Change.org]

Image via Shutterstock

  1. Drunk Chris Berman

    Yeah get a typical liberal to try and convicne Texan elector to chnage his vote and tell me how that works

    9 years ago at 6:18 pm
      1. Rosa Parks Fan Club

        Either you’re really drunk, or your spellcheck voted for Hildabeast

        9 years ago at 8:49 pm
    1. CanadianB4C0N

      Well if Hillary supporters are willing to “repay a small fine” I’m sure you could find some willing to offer “additional incentive” to Texas.

      9 years ago at 12:08 pm
      1. SigmaAlphaMan

        Technically yes but not historically. We have a democratic system for a reason. There’s no reason they would flip on that after 240 years.

        9 years ago at 6:32 pm
      2. House of Paign

        Somewhere in between. In some states it is not binding, but the electors in Trump states are Republicans and the electors in Clinton states are Democrats. They are not neutral parties. So the chance of anyone switching are pretty low.

        9 years ago at 12:09 am
  2. Robert Goulet

    This is why no one takes y’all seriously. Let’s just go ahead and try to circumvent our election procedures because you’re upset. Makes total sense.

    9 years ago at 6:24 pm
  3. Big Dumb Idiot

    If this happens, I’ll protest. Except my protest will be with guns. Lots of them. And it won’t be a protest, it’ll be a revolution.

    9 years ago at 6:48 pm
    1. ReardenSteel

      I’ll be right there with ya. Better yet, why don’t we just take some of the more conservative states, ideally located in a geographic cluster, and sort of try and start our own country? I feel like that could work out and as long as we state our willingness to coexist peacefully with the Federal Government, a lot of bloodshed could be avoided.

      9 years ago at 1:12 am
      1. Big Dumb Idiot

        We have more money this time. We also have a lot more guns and balls than they do.

        9 years ago at 6:29 am
      2. Nosherz

        you really think this is a north and south issue? let me remind you that TRUMP is from QUEENS NEW YORK. Were not all dirty liberals here jsut the hippie trash transplants that move here from the midwest and the moolies

        9 years ago at 4:48 pm
      3. House of Paign

        More people voted for Trump in Illinois than in Alabama and Mississippi combined. Just sayin’.

        9 years ago at 3:39 pm
      4. FratrickBateman1302

        The fact that Illinois has almost twice the population of Alabama and Mississippi combined might have something to do with that.

        9 years ago at 9:04 pm
      5. House of Paign

        Well yeah, obviously. Not saying we are more Republican, but I am saying that there are plenty of us here.

        9 years ago at 11:05 am
  4. BobMotherFuckingBarker

    I was as anti trump as it gets, but he won the election, not accepting it only further divides the already extremely divided country. I’ve always thought that the electoral college didn’t make much sense, but that’s the system we have in place. If you blatantly disregard what the people voted for then the government loses any credibility it has left.

    9 years ago at 6:55 pm
  5. Reasonable_man

    It’s startling to me just how quickly liberals are willing to go to any extreme and just how easily they can justify any bad act, so long as it furthers their cause. They have this idea that they are doing the will of humanity, even if others aren’t smart enough to follow their logic and get on board.

    9 years ago at 7:16 pm
  6. Trutuitt

    Leon Russell died yesterday. How many more times are you going to recycle the left’s reaction over the election into mediocre articles before you cover something that actually matters?

    9 years ago at 7:46 pm
    1. Cartier

      Way to go. You ruined all the batshit show-off tryhard discourse with that comment.

      9 years ago at 7:18 am
  7. mosthonorableactive

    If you want to change the EC, do it between elections. Doing it to reverse your loss is poor sportsmanship, plain and simple. The real world doesn’t have blue shells for the last place driver

    9 years ago at 7:51 pm
    1. Cory_and_Trevor

      im all for changing the ec, but you cant do it retroactively. they ran their campaigns with those rules of the game, not to mention the people in swing states who voted for say, gary johnson to prove a point because they knew their state was a lock. You don’t see sports leagues changing the results after the fact becaue they decide to change the rules

      9 years ago at 11:31 pm