EXCLUSIVE: Leaked Documents Show University Of Tennessee Plans Major Overhaul Of Greek Parties
Back in the early months of 2015, I covered an interesting story about the battle between University Of Tennessee administrators and the Greek system. The gist of the story was this: A loophole in an existing rule allowed UTPD to pin the blame on a chapter for drinking incidents off campus at, say, an apartment or a house. It was some serious abuse of power.
Thanks to a few anonymous tipsters, we now know that campus administrators are planning on expanding on that power. The administrators are looking to effectively end all off-campus parties held by Greek organizations, even something as little as a get-together between a few members. The new policies do not specifically say that off-campus parties are now banned. Instead, administrators are making them economically impossible to hold.
Under the compliance section of the new Sorority and Fraternity Event Notification Form, the first rule states that “alcohol must be provided by a third party vendor.” That means that instead of buying kegs, cases, bottles of liquor, mixers, etc., Greek organizations will now have to bring in an alcohol distributor who will sell alcohol at the event. Third party vendors are not cheap. I know this from firsthand experience being a social chair.
In the “suggested practices” section, there is a checklist of items that are required for every event when you register your party. These items include: hiring a security guard, carding at the door, applying wristbands to distinguish age, providing non-alcoholic beverages, having a sober monitor for every 10-15 guests, having a guest sign-in sheet which may be given to the university, and provide non-salty foods. Some of these items I understand. The ones that baffle me are the “provide non-salty foods,” and the needing one sober monitor for every ten guests. The rest are just typical cover-your-ass procedures. However, hiring a security guard, buying wristbands, and buying food all add up in cost in addition to the third party vendor costs.
I’ve been told that another option is for organizations is to rent out a bar for their parties. The cost of that can run $500 on a weekday, and $1,000 on a weekend. The kicker, from what I’ve heard, is that bars typically require you to get a band if you rent out the bar. If that is true, your event can get pretty expensive depending on who you get.
Finally, the rules under the “What Constitutes a Chapter Event” section are extremely vague. In short, if a few fraternity members buy a keg and invite a few friends over, this could now be considered a chapter event. There is a chance that the university will take advantage of this vague description because, if an organization does not inform the university of an event, they could get hit with violations.
Here are the documents that were sent to us via the anonymous tipsters:
The Basics of Social Event Planning
Sorority and Fraternity Event Notification Form (Draft)
Dark times are looming on the Rocky Top. Stay the course, and fight the good fight, Vols..
Image via YouTube

Jimmy Cheek is a fucking pussy.
11 years ago at 12:16 pmjust me or does “only one entrance/exit” seem like a fire/safety hazard? i’m sure if UT REALLY wanted to protect greeks, this isn’t accomplishing that
11 years ago at 12:17 pmGood point.
11 years ago at 12:19 pmMy university had the same rule. You still have designated emergency exits. The one entrance/exit for the party actually protects you from excise policy if done properly. I am not in favor of these rules, but as a former risk manager, it helped keep excise out. If excise is posted in street clothes outside of the fraternity and sees someone, anyone at all, use a door, window, etc. other than the one specified to the university they can lawfully enter that same opening.
11 years ago at 1:14 pmI wish universities would see the negative consequences from making events hard to register. We have a system like this at my school and basically no chapter registers events, which in turn makes them more dangerous for girls going to sketchy parties at sketchy off campus places that would never get approved in the first place.
11 years ago at 12:19 pmWe’ve had to do this at my school for years. You just don’t follow the rules. It’s pretty simple.
11 years ago at 12:21 pmThis is an exact replica of the Party Registration policy at Cal Poly SLO. The shittiest thing is, the schools put out these rules without any way of effectively enforcing the rules. I have to fill out one of those stupid forms every time we want to do a party, yet nobody ever actually looks at them. I’ve even replaced guests’ names with celebrities (Michelle Obama, Rachel Starr, etc.) and it has gone un noticed.
My Advice to you, UT: Keep partying, but be twice as good at covering your ass.
11 years ago at 12:22 pmthat’s great – they’ll make a bunch of rules, and you know what? nobody will care or follow them
at my school they banned paddles, bigs/littles, and all alcohol at parties, and nobody cared.
11 years ago at 12:23 pmThe time is past for men and women to stand up to the universities and start challenging their assumptions that they can rule the lives of students off campus. The old parens patriae doctrine should be dead and buried by now. It will take some concerted effort and lawsuits to do this, but the time is ripe to get the Courts to correct this outmoded and ancient relic. The days when students, and this includes GEEDS also, submit to “parenting” by a college or university should be long gone.
11 years ago at 8:05 pmHearing news like this makes me want jump up on stage at the next Bernie Sanders campaign rally and shut it down because #fratlivesmatter
11 years ago at 12:27 pmThis is why waste in higher ed simply needs to be cut, because when you just let tuition and administrative costs bloat you inevitably get administrators who sit around and formulate asinine rules like these.
11 years ago at 12:28 pmThis isn’t distinct to Tennessee. Clemson, among others, is pushing the same exact social guidelines (I believe the documents were identical minus the school in the header). This type of sanctions will be more widespread in a few years unless compromises are made.
11 years ago at 12:31 pmThis third party vendor rule is being tried elsewhere to. It’s a bunch of bull shit.
11 years ago at 12:33 pm