New York Law Changes Collegiate Sexual Consent From “No Means No” To “Yes Means Yes”

Post-function sloppy make out sessions. TFM.

A new law in New York has completely changed the hookup game for college students in the state. Instead of the classic “no means no” approach to countering instances of rape on campuses, a new “yes means yes” rule has been implemented. Basically, for every step you make, you will be required to verbally ask for permission before proceeding.

From Syracuse:

In New York, there is now on all college campuses. A bill signed into law July 7 requires both parties to obtain consent for sex and each nibble and caress that sometimes paves the way. The law applies only on college campuses. At its heart is a simple concept: instead of “No Means No,” it’s “Yes Means Yes.”

“Can I kiss you?”

“Yes.”

“Can I grab your left breast?”

“Yes.”

“Can I grab your right breast?”

“Yes.”

“Can I paint you red and pee on you like a dirty little fire hydrant?”

“Good boy.”

This plan ruins the flow of things. Better idea: written hookup contracts carried by students whenever they go out. First, mark everything on the list that you would be comfortable consenting to in the bedroom. Then, both parties must review the terms of one another’s contracts and sign the paper before proceeding physically (Bonus: if a girl has like a hundred signatures, you know to steer clear).

Example Contract:

[x] 1st Base

[x] 2nd Base

[x] 3rd Base

[ ] All the way

[ ] Butt Stuff

[X] Fire Hydrant Stuff

An even better solution would be mandatory camera installations in every dorm room, and I would like to be the first one to personally volunteer to review all of the footage for instances of foul play. Anything to make sex safer for the kids.

[via Syracuse]

  1. RedPill

    The goal is to get as many males as possible on the sex offender registry or kicked out of school. SJW’s usually hate guys who pull. If they get em on the registry, they control their lives.

    10 years ago at 5:23 pm
    1. fratsohardUn1versity

      Colleges are so hostile to males, particually white males. they are pushing them out of higher education in order to promote the gynocentric agenda

      10 years ago at 6:10 pm
      1. DionysusFratGod

        That’s a pretty stupid statement, white males typically are the largest population in most universities, on top of that white families on average earn more money then other minorities so why would they kick out their cash cows? With that being said , the government is pushing for universities to enroll more underprivileged and sometimes undeserving minorities and don’t quote me on this but if they reach a certain quota of minority students they will receive more funding due to some act that we probably haven’t paid attention too. Or they are trying to avoid potential lawsuits in liberal America because someone felt offended . Fact is more white males are in trouble because there is more white males. So don’t make this a race issue when universities equally show indifference to all colors , lean more towards feminism and hate Greek life with a passion.

        10 years ago at 7:35 pm
      2. Presidente

        They dont show indifference at all. Look at the crimes black athletes are committing, they usually get a slap on the wrist at best.

        Lets go ahead and get your head out of that sand

        10 years ago at 7:52 pm
      3. hutchskolf13

        I’m not a lawyer, but won’t this only apply to university owned dorms/libraries/buildings? It is only valid on campus so I’d assume it doesn’t apply to off campus housing, bars, etc. If not then what constitutes “campus?”

        10 years ago at 10:44 pm
      4. DionysusFratGod

        Do I have to pull your head out of the sand so you can see where you fucked up?

        10 years ago at 5:20 pm
    2. Presidente

      Feminism= Restricting male sexuality while maximizing female sexuality.

      They want these dumb rules to shit-test all the chumps. Anyone they actually want to screw has more balls than this “stop and ask for consent every minute” stuff.

      They separate the wheat from the chaff legislatively…or should I say the Don Juans from the average chumps.

      Women love to retroactively wipe away their sluttiness if they have regrets. This is yet another avenue to do so…

      10 years ago at 7:57 pm
  2. FrattyCoug

    “Anything to make sex safer for the kids.” Did Dorn write this behind another alias?

    10 years ago at 5:27 pm
  3. Booze_Hound

    The Liberals can have New York and Detroit. They infiltrated both years ago and I’ve accepted that. However, they’re like a disease. And they’ll attempt to spread this idea to every house and bar in America. The same people who created this law will scream equality. But they’re full of shit. They’ll do anything and everything to make men guilty for actions they’re not responsible for. Women will use this rule in an attempt to remove criticism amongst their friends, and accuse men of rape, just so they can keep a strong reputation, avoid looking slutty, or simply receive attention. America used to protect people. People were once innocent until proven guilty. Now they’re guilty until proven innocent and forever guilty amongst liberals. Here’s an idea, no means no. And if you say yes, have consensual sex and then turn around and cry rape, you get arrested for defamation.

    10 years ago at 5:30 pm
    1. TerraKingPin

      Fuck off. New York City is one of the highest functioning places in America. Liberal policies won’t work elsewhere and that is completely okay. But to call liberalism a “disease” and say it’s “infiltrated” places is just as bad as Yankees shitting on Conservatives for their ways of life in the South and the Heartland. I swear to God the two-party rivalry is gonna be the death of this country.

      10 years ago at 6:16 pm
      1. NY Frock Exchange

        Are you serious? Do you have any idea how bad NY actually is right now? I go to school here and the liberals have ruined everything. Prices are high on everything and this law is just one more thing that makes NY the hellhole its becoming.

        10 years ago at 6:30 pm
      2. TerraKingPin

        The city is far from becoming a hell hole. I have lived in it all of my life and can attest to the fact that the quality of life is wonderful, especially considering the hellhole it dug itself out of not more than 30 years ago.

        But yes, the cost of living is getting way out of hand. But the city isn’t close to crumbling because of it.

        10 years ago at 8:16 pm
      3. Booze_Hound

        Liberalism is a disease. The policy that epitomizes my statement is when Obama proposed low income housing in “white privileged suburbs” in an attempt to “brown white neighborhoods.” This is nothing more than an attempt to bring liberal voters to predominantly republican communities. And therefore spread democratic votes throughout counties instead of centering them in cities. You can look at liberals refusing to deport illegal immigrants, because by doing so they’re sending away potential democratic voters. Liberalism spreads and kills anything it touches. And if you think NYC is doing well I can attest it’s not. Considering I live right outside of it. Bill De Blasio is bringing liberal policy to the city, turning his back on the police department, and dividing classes. Crime is up, and arrests are down.
        TLDR: I’m glad we agree this law sucks.

        10 years ago at 6:45 pm
      4. fratsohardUn1versity

        Well said Booze. I am glad you brought up housing. I think its a larger agenda than votes. Its liberals and their hate of successful white Christian society trying to intregrate said society as much as possible to uproot it. Not to sound like a conspirator but I gotta wonder when we are told to love “diversity” Look at nations as a whole also. Africa is for Africans, Asia is for Asians, South America for Hispanics, but whenever a nation is “too white” whatever that means it is considered “racist” and must diversfy. Diversity literally means less white people

        10 years ago at 6:58 pm
      5. fratsohardUn1versity

        Dude I live in New York now the city has been destroyed. Crimes rates are down yes. But its become way to expensive to live. They tax the shit out of you. The city is going bankrupt and is literally begging to fall apart.its not a two party rivalry its reality when you look and see what the policiy makers have done to the most amazing city in the world

        10 years ago at 6:53 pm
    2. FriggidaFriggidaFriggidaFratDaddy

      I’m not in favor of this rule, nor am I defending those who falsely accuse others of rape, but have you stopped to think about the fact that there is a correlation between slut shaming and false rape accusations? One hardly ever hears of men falsely accusing anyone of rape; there are myriad reasons for this, but lack of a social stigma associated with having sex is among them.

      This legislation won’t solve the problems of campus date rape or false accusations. If someone wants to rape someone else, words won’t create a magical no-rape forcefield, and if someone wants to falsely accuse another, how can consent be proven unless it’s in writing? But an individual can avoid raping others and can address what motivates some women to make false accusations (slut shaming is among the reasons), and an individual can choose not to contribute to the problem. Individual social responsibility > government legislation.

      10 years ago at 8:51 am
  4. Bluto_Brotarsky

    So what happens if both partners are blacked out? Oh, wait, I forgot; it’s always the guy’s fault no matter what.

    This is a CYA by New York State. Nothing more, nothing less.

    10 years ago at 5:33 pm
  5. Dclapp

    For fuck sake as if women don’t already have the benefit of the doubt in the court of law. These laws are going to make everything that much worst for males.

    10 years ago at 6:01 pm
  6. fratsohardUn1versity

    “Harvard’s governing body believes sexual assault is so henious of a crime that even innocence is not a defense.” Harvard law professor when they passed similar laws.

    Its scary liberalism is literally a disease. They drag down society and ruin it. Everything liberals touch they destroy. The courts, the business world , pop culture. everything. It doesnt stop. If you are a white male in society you better be fucking careful becuase one mistake ruins your life and liberals and feminist cheer when they bring another white male down thinking they are being liberated. As I have said before I really hope a republican wins. Not because they will fix things…they wont. But liberals can united and focus on hating the president. Since the democrats have the white house and senate they need other stuff to get angry about and will find it wherever they can.

    10 years ago at 6:09 pm
    1. Bluto_Brotarsky

      And yet they’ll wail like a woman in labor if an actual rapist gets the death penalty.

      10 years ago at 6:11 pm
    2. FratensteinsMonster

      Just to be clear for others reading this, the quote is from a retired, staunchly conservative Harvard professor who was criticizing the policy. When I read it I initially thought that quote was released by one of the policy’s creators as a justification for the new policy and was absolutely horrified.

      10 years ago at 8:14 pm
      1. FratensteinsMonster

        Sorry never mind, this guy is actually liberal, but is a constitutionalist and cares about preserving our rights. Even some liberals can see how crazy this is.

        10 years ago at 8:19 pm
      1. Booze_Hound

        When you get tired, I’ll come in as a second string viewer so NYU can continue running laps. Fuck your own face NYU.

        10 years ago at 7:45 pm
    1. fratsohardUn1versity

      Dude dont be a white knight this is another assault on your rights. Only white knight manginas and beta males would support this. One false accuastion and it is literally IMPOSSIBLE to prove your innocence. We are one crazy female away from getting our lives ruined and society doesnt bat an eye

      10 years ago at 8:00 pm
    2. Daddys Home

      C’mon dude. Accuser has the burden of proof, not the accused. This is America in the 21st century, not the middle fucking ages.

      10 years ago at 9:54 pm
      1. FrayettevilleLegend

        That’s not true on college campuses. When schools implement the “guilty until proven innocent” policy, as several have, it perverts the justice system and places the duty of proof on the accused.

        10 years ago at 10:21 pm