Study Shows Physically Stronger Men Are More Likely To Be Conservatives
A new study reveals what most people already assumed: men who are of physically inferior stature are more likely to vote left wing, while stronger men tend to vote conservatively. I always knew there was something special about this barrel chest I was blessed with beyond its obvious magnetism of the fairer sex.
You ought to see my neighbor — real dainty, huge lib.
From Daily Mail:
Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.
Men’s upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the research.
The researchers collected data on bicep size, socio-economic status, and support for economic redistribution from hundreds of people in the United States, Argentina and Denmark.
In line with their hypotheses, the data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it.
There you have it, right there in black and white in a study conducted by smart people.
I have some hypotheses of my own. Aside from being physically stronger, right-wingers also have more body hair, slug back more beers and whiskey, eat more red meat, burn more gasoline, spend more money, are more likely to wipe sitting down, date better looking women, and last longer in the sack. Someone run a study on this and get back to me, or don’t — we already know what the results will reveal.
[via Daily Mail]
Those Barry O pictures make me so angry.
12 years ago at 10:11 amFreedom loving conservatives will always dominate liberal pussies.
12 years ago at 10:12 amBut look who’s running our country. Biggest liberal pussy I’ve ever heard of.
12 years ago at 11:03 amFUck you, youz just mad we prezident now! Fuckin crackerjack
12 years ago at 1:16 pmThe study shows that strong/rich men and weak/poor men are less likely to support redistribution, while strong/poor men and weak/rich men are more likely to support redistribution. Apparently “liberal pussies” can fully understand what a study is about, while “freedom loving conservatives” can only read a couple words at a time.
12 years ago at 8:54 pmhttp://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/political-motivations-may-have-evolutionary-links-to-physical-strength.html
^ look who just called himself a pussy, and worse yet,a liberal. get out of here geed your not gonna convince any of us to be bleeding heart libs. go kick rocks
12 years ago at 2:07 am^ Look who has an IQ of less than 80. Maybe if you read the full study instead of getting your “news” 2nd hand from a trashy tabloid, you wouldn’t look like such an idiot. People like you ruin America.
12 years ago at 1:08 pmi wasnt commenting about the study at all was I champ? I was commenting on your comment. Regardless of the study we can all agree liberals are effeminate little pussies.
12 years ago at 10:33 amNo wonder Pike are liberals…..
12 years ago at 10:13 amI dont know bro, PIKEs are renown for being pretty big meatheads.
12 years ago at 1:08 pmyou’d be hard pressed to find a single liberal in my chapter bud
12 years ago at 1:27 pm^ Hard pressed, huh? Was that a subtle lifting joke? I like it.
12 years ago at 2:12 pmDon’t know what is more Majestic, that damn horse or Reagan.
12 years ago at 10:13 amReagan’s hair. It’s a mane of manliness.
12 years ago at 10:32 am^glad Im not the only one who thought that. no homo
12 years ago at 7:39 pmThis has more to do with education then anything. Poor white men are more likely to be conservatives, and also work in construction (hence being stronger).
12 years ago at 10:14 am“This has more to do with education then anything.”
Such a rich sentence.
12 years ago at 10:15 am^^ I don’t understand what point you’re trying to make? Probably because you don’t have one.
12 years ago at 10:17 am^
12 years ago at 10:18 am“Than” not “then” you liberal piece of horse shit
12 years ago at 10:24 am^^big dumb idiots are conservative. Weak educated pussies are liberals.
12 years ago at 10:27 am^You seem to contradict yourself.
12 years ago at 10:47 am^^ I guess that’s why some of the nation’s greatest leaders, Reagan, CEO’s of many of the nation’s biggest/most successful companies, Reagan, W, AND FUCKING REAGAN are conservatives. They must be real dumb?
Fuck you Putin.
12 years ago at 11:12 amAnd you’ve clearly never worked one, because some blue collar jobs make a fuckton. Licensed and bonded electricians and plumbers can charge boatloads per hour. I had high school friends who went offshore for oilfield jobs rather than college and at 20 years old make more than my tenured professor.
12 years ago at 11:29 amNever go full retard.
12 years ago at 12:22 pmYou can’t argue with science.
12 years ago at 10:16 amNow that we have science on our side, the liberals have lost everything. AMERICA
12 years ago at 10:17 amYou spelt ‘Merica, wrong.
12 years ago at 7:38 pm“There you have it, right there in black and white in a study conducted by smart people.”
*posts pictures of 2 white right wings and 1 left wing*
Was this intentional Dorn?
12 years ago at 10:18 amNo.
12 years ago at 10:20 amgot ’em ^
12 years ago at 10:21 am^I was asking a legitimate question, fucking idiot.
12 years ago at 10:23 amWait. Some people don’t wipe sitting down? This is news to me.
12 years ago at 10:19 amIt’s true, and it’s just wrong.
12 years ago at 10:19 amI cant picture that. Do they do like a captain morgan type thing over the seat? or… You know what, I dont care.
12 years ago at 10:33 am“the data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it”. Correct me if i’m wrong, but the only thing that this study proved was that WEALTH determines support of redistribution (left or right wing status). If the less wealthy men were “of the same strength”.
12 years ago at 10:27 amShut up, Meg.
12 years ago at 10:33 amI’m an idiot.
12 years ago at 11:14 amRead the rest of the article you lazy twats.
12 years ago at 11:56 amStrong Rich less likely to support redistribution than weak rich, strong poor, weak poor. I would bet you guys both go to schools that have a name including both a direction and a “state.”
12 years ago at 11:58 amBut it doesn’t actually say that anywhere? I bet you go to a community college
12 years ago at 1:05 pmFrom the journal’s site, it seems like:
strong/rich and weak/poor are more right-wing
weak/rich and strong/poor are more left-wing
“In all three countries, physically strong males consistently pursue the self-interested position on redistribution.”
You guys need to read more.
http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/political-motivations-may-have-evolutionary-links-to-physical-strength.html
12 years ago at 8:45 pmWay to edit my post Dale. Someone’s a little insecure, now aren’t they.
12 years ago at 11:06 am