The Civil War II: North Frats vs. Southern Fraternities, Part 2

Screen shot 2013-09-12 at 12.40.04 PM

“Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn’t every war fought between men, between brothers?” – Victor Hugo

Before we get this started, I’d just like to take a moment and address the midwesterners who were kind enough to write in after Part 1, asking where their consideration was. You were considered…as a part of the North, because that’s where you live. This speaks to a larger issue I have with the opinions of some Midwesterners: namely, that you are not “the best of both worlds.” To compare your manner to the South is an insult to the typical Southern gentleman — most of you can’t even be bothered to not wear sweatpants. And to downplay an association with the Northeast is like Princess Jasmine costuming as a gutter slut to escape her rich, hilarious dad who gave her a pet tiger. Don’t get cute, guys. You have no oceans, no mountains, no unique culture, history, or cuisine, and your two largest industries are government subsidized. Don’t get me wrong, I love the Midwest — the Big Ten schools are fantastic places, and figure prominently in the thought process of these articles — but a spade is a spade. Embrace who you are: a subsect of the north that’s slightly nicer, lacking an accent, and poorly dressed.

With that out of the way, let’s get on with it. Last week, the South eked out a victory on the General Attitude category of the Civil War, giving them the early 1-0 lead. This week we dive into some turbulent waters: Who are the better partiers? As always, comments are welcome so long as you agree with everything I say and you’re not from California. Let’s do this:

Partying Ability

First, as always, a story. A few years ago, I traveled down to Tuscaloosa to attend the PSU vs. Alabama game. It being my first tailgating experience in the SEC, I was blown away. Tents everywhere, beautiful coeds in dresses, grills hot, and televisions running on generators. Sure, you can find these same things at Michigan, or Ohio State, or Penn State (minus the dresses, but stay tuned next week for more on that), but it’s to a whole other level in the SEC. I guess the best way I can put it is that the SEC is just so ORGANIZED. It’s as if every individual has a particular duty that they know deeply, inherently even — a devout commitment to gameday. The result is the most welcoming, navigable, clean, delicious, and well-stocked tailgates I’ve ever witnessed. It’s a perfect, pleasant experience.

Anyway, that day, some young alumni from Penn State threw their own tailgate (fill in a couple short details here – this was the exact tailgate I was at. I even remember the guy putting up the pathetic “P” on those columns (see above photo) like it was his 5th grade art project. It’s probably a result of the post-party ex-swagger-ation, but it DID feel as if women and children watched in horror as I tried to see if drinking at the same time as peeing would result in me peeing forever (for science). Undergrads called us classless, old-timers worried for our health, and the school paper featured a story on the next Monday accusing Penn State of being a school of disgusting animals. All of them were right, of course. We rolled in by the hundreds with Breaking Bad RVs, cases of cheap vodka, 30 racks of Keith Stone stacked to the sky, and a few bags of Cool Ranch Doritos. We went absolutely berserk and it was a complete insult to Southern culture. Nothing about it was perfect OR pleasant. But you know what? It was a blast.

See, there’s the thing. If you’re from the South, you know how steeped in tradition, religion, and family you are. Mom tousled your hair while she finished the grits and waited for your father to come home and fix an old-fashioned. But the North is this region of latchkey kids who spent their youth raiding their parents prescription and liquor cabinets because Mom and Dad were busy at depositions. So, by extension, the South runs these perfect little well-adjusted, well-dressed get-togethers while the Northern kids try harder and harder to blur the line between “fun” and “weird.” Frankly, they have no idea how to even throw a party, and the result is less classical, more jazz. There are no rules about who’s allowed to come, what to wear, how liquors need to mix together, or what music needs to play. What’s born of that is sometimes an awful flop of a kegger, sure, but occasionally it sparks into the type of pandemonium I don’t believe is possible at Southern schools. Only in the North can I say that I’ve been to parties that I was actually AFRAID of. I’ve seen men fall from balconies, women make love to each other on dance floors, and cars lit on fire. Only in the North do the parties become riots. And this was at Delaware. That’s not even Division 1, in football OR social life. I drank at these parties, partially because it was somewhat enjoyable, yes, but partially because the best way to survive a dangerous undertow is just to swim with it.

Truthfully, if you ask me which party I’d rather go to, I’ll tell you a Southern party. I would look forward to that. Beautiful women dressed nicely and bourbon neat all night, that’s a fun night for a guy who has already graduated. I know what I’m getting into. But this is college. College parties should be like a scary movie: twists, turns, and weird. One time I had a buddy who quit drinking for a month to “dry out.” When he came back to the sauce, I asked him what changed, and he said he started knowing where he was going to end up every night. He said alcohol brought an exciting uncertainty to it all, and without it, every night was fine, but no night was going to be incredible. To him, alcohol wasn’t just a vehicle to get drunk; it was the art of the possible. So I can say this: Yes, I’d rather go to a Southern party. It’s the more comfortable choice. But Northern parties showed me the art of the possible — how far life could be stretched when everyone flails to live more. Sometimes it’s a disaster, but they’ve also been the best times of my life.

Partying Ability: The North wins over The South. We’re all tied up at 1.

***

  1. hugebroner

    So is this gonna be the one pity point we give to the North? Because the South should sweep the rest of the categories.

    11 years ago at 12:53 pm
  2. Six_Thirty

    Stop trying to put the Midwest in the same boat as the northeast you fucking piece of shit. You’re only doing it because there’s not even decent Greek life where you’re from.

    11 years ago at 12:54 pm
    1. Six_Thirty

      Also, trying to say the Great Lakes region which was settle in the 1600s has no history or culture is straight up ignorant.

      11 years ago at 12:58 pm
    2. Ole_Frat

      That Northern education all the yankees really rave about is coming through pretty clearly isn’t it.

      11 years ago at 1:00 pm
    3. Six_Thirty

      Chicago, permanently settle in 1679, first permanent settlement in Michigan 1650s, Indiana 1679, Minnesota late 1600s… And so on. You were saying?

      11 years ago at 1:07 pm
    4. Phive Apples

      The Midwest is still in the North. Illinois, Ohio, and Michigan were three of the most prominent Union states during the War. If you fought for the Union and/or you’re not in the SEC, you’re in the North. The North is the majority of the country.

      Plus, the majority of the Midwest is above the Mason-Dixon line, inherently making them in the North. Read the first article and the stipulations of the lines drawn. It makes relative sense.

      11 years ago at 1:32 pm
    5. Bro Webb

      The Midwest has a completely different culture from the Northeast. I’m guessing jtrain is basing the Midwest off of Michigan and Ohio (which aren’t really the MIdwest). Try MN, WI, IL, NE, or IA and compare the lifestyle to the Northeast

      11 years ago at 1:47 pm
    6. BrovWade

      ^Exactly. I go to Michigan and it’s not the real midwest. An absolute blast, no doubt, but not like where I’m from. Also Ohio truly has zero redeeming qualities.

      11 years ago at 2:18 pm
    7. White Guy

      ^^ Exactly. Michigan and Ohio are shitty rusting out states with shitty rusting out cities. They are not the midwest.

      11 years ago at 2:21 pm
    8. Tony__Bromo

      “Rusting out states”? Isn’t Mississippi the poorest state in the union?

      11 years ago at 7:17 pm
    9. inhocFaF

      Not being one of the 13 colonies, NF.

      JK, but it had to be said. I’m from NY and I would never associate the Midwest with the South. Even some of the states considered “Southern” in this column are more mid atlantic than anything. Cali also needs to be differentiated from the Northwest.

      11 years ago at 11:03 am
    10. Six_Thirty

      ^No one’s trying to say the Midwest is southern, it’s Midwestern, we’re saying Jewtrain should stop lumping the Midwest in with his god awful region.

      11 years ago at 11:08 am
    11. Grandpa

      I would lump the UP of MI with the Midwest, it is more like WI than the lower peninsula of MI. And “rusting out” is clearly meant as being part of the rust belt.

      11 years ago at 12:44 pm
    12. Dwight D Fratenhower

      In fact most of the SEC was relatively unimportant to the Civil War. Sure some major Corps (Jackson, Longstreet and Ewell’s in particular) were composed of men from Mississippi and Tennessee but only a handful of major battles were fought outside of Virginia. SC (Half ACC and Half SEC) started the war and had the most important port while Virginia (ACC) saw the bulk of the fighting. Tennessee saw Chicamauga fall “The Death Knell of the Confederacy” and Mississippi obviously had Vicksburg. To say only the SEC is the confederacy is absurd. In fact the entire civil war could probably have been fought without a single fully-SEC state

      11 years ago at 4:19 am
    1. five_fratpples

      I bet they do with all those geeds wearing snapbacks, Hurley, cargos, and earrings.

      11 years ago at 5:22 pm
  3. DornFromMajorLeague

    Yeah because nothing says party like shitty drugs, sweatpants, and hair gel.

    11 years ago at 12:56 pm
  4. Barry Browater 1964

    Because any Jersey Shore GDI can go to a party in the North and act like a total “badass” by setting shit on fire the North parties better?

    You’re drunk Freid, go home to your sweatpants. I’ll stay in Dixie.

    11 years ago at 12:56 pm
  5. GA_boy

    Yeah because at our Southern parties we just sit around and sip bourbon quietly. Absolute bullshit the South has better parties we have more funds, hotter girls, and better places to party

    11 years ago at 1:02 pm
    1. Tuco1855

      ^Since we’re talking about parties, wealth doesn’t matter. There are very wealthy northern chapters as well. ^^^he was claiming the south has more funds that pertain directly to parties, which is an impossible statement to confirm.

      11 years ago at 2:11 pm
  6. notheconor1

    As a Northerner, I can honestly say that we will never be what the south is when it comes to greek life. Doesn’t mean we don’t have a great time, but going to the south to party is always better. It’s a fact.

    11 years ago at 1:07 pm