I agree with kbazz here. The statement states that one thing that is funny is frating. Additionally, the statement says that women do not frat. However, the statement fails to consider that women might be funny in non-frat ways. Therefore if this was a failure in logic question the answer would be that women might be funny in a non-frat way. The statement fails to establish frating as the only thing that is funny. I hope Jordan14 enjoys his awful LSAT score and the bottom tier school he is forced to attend.
if farting then funny. so the contrapositive is if not funny then not farting.
if women then not fart. if fart then not women
and the conclusion hes attempting to draw is
if women then not funny or contraposed if funny then not women.
there is no failure in the logic section. in logical reasoning you can have a strenghener/weakener, flaw, assumption, inference et al. therefore it would depend on the question stem whether which one of us is right.
Ok, TCUfratmaster, I bet you nailed your LSAT considering you can’t even spell a four letter word. The word is fart (F-A-R-T), not frat (F-R-A-T). This confusion could be due to a case of dyslexia or maybe you’re just stupid. You tell us.
apologies to piker, my ambiened-out state is apparently not conducive to understanding english sentences. TFTC?
i guess ill just go hallucinate some hippos now.
After reading this I feel that you have a very bright future ahead of you. You will be irreplaceable to whoever you work for. With or without your daddy’s money or influence.
^This…
Is an example of when checking a comment before it is posted does not occur. Go back to school and learn how to type correctly or spell simple words, focusing on whichever missing facet of your education allowed for the omission of a “t” in at.
Women don’t do something that’s funny. Alright.
14 years ago at 9:34 pmWell…if you think those two statements equal “women aren’t funny” you should probably get ready to enjoy your fourth tier law school.
14 years ago at 9:46 pm^
14 years ago at 10:18 pmglad to know that my conclusion at least crossed your mind, captain.
14 years ago at 10:41 pmkbazz i mean that is the assumption in the logic so that should get him a 180…
14 years ago at 11:21 pmkbazz enjoy getting a 120 on the lsat.
14 years ago at 11:39 pmI agree with kbazz here. The statement states that one thing that is funny is frating. Additionally, the statement says that women do not frat. However, the statement fails to consider that women might be funny in non-frat ways. Therefore if this was a failure in logic question the answer would be that women might be funny in a non-frat way. The statement fails to establish frating as the only thing that is funny. I hope Jordan14 enjoys his awful LSAT score and the bottom tier school he is forced to attend.
14 years ago at 4:00 amif farting then funny. so the contrapositive is if not funny then not farting.
if women then not fart. if fart then not women
and the conclusion hes attempting to draw is
if women then not funny or contraposed if funny then not women.
there is no failure in the logic section. in logical reasoning you can have a strenghener/weakener, flaw, assumption, inference et al. therefore it would depend on the question stem whether which one of us is right.
14 years ago at 6:20 amOk, TCUfratmaster, I bet you nailed your LSAT considering you can’t even spell a four letter word. The word is fart (F-A-R-T), not frat (F-R-A-T). This confusion could be due to a case of dyslexia or maybe you’re just stupid. You tell us.
14 years ago at 8:18 amWomen don’t fart in a funny manner?
14 years ago at 9:46 pmGuys, give him a break! He’s only 14!
14 years ago at 9:49 pmOnly 4 more years
14 years ago at 9:29 amand its hazing time. Learn to end a sentence with punctuation marks.
14 years ago at 12:33 pmhaha fuck yall, im 20. the point of this website is to crack jokes.
14 years ago at 9:56 pmAfter reading that TFM, I’d rather you crack your head on an axe and die than make another attempt at a joke.
14 years ago at 9:58 pmYou might want to recheck that sentence structure piker.
14 years ago at 10:07 pmYou should probably check your composition as well, whiskey. Notice my use of a comma to separate your name from the rest of the sentence.
14 years ago at 10:22 pmdid you mean punctuation?
14 years ago at 12:58 amapologies to piker, my ambiened-out state is apparently not conducive to understanding english sentences. TFTC?
14 years ago at 1:10 ami guess ill just go hallucinate some hippos now.
Jordan14, do you really feel the need to justify yourself?
14 years ago at 1:15 amJordan is fucking awesome, crackin jokes and shit…hey look I found him!
http://www.facebook.com/oezennia
14 years ago at 2:07 amJordan14 doesn’t fart.
14 years ago at 10:04 pmAfter reading this I feel that you have a very bright future ahead of you. You will be irreplaceable to whoever you work for. With or without your daddy’s money or influence.
14 years ago at 10:24 pm^Taking jokes seriously. NF. Fucktard.
14 years ago at 2:34 am^”Taking jokes seriously. NF. Fucktard.”
14 years ago at 12:05 pmLSAT Logic prep: Fratting is a way of life. Women love money. You do the math. TFM.
14 years ago at 10:26 pm^This…
14 years ago at 2:33 amIs fucking retarded. Go back to being a geed who sucks a logic and anything LSAT related.
^This…
14 years ago at 10:44 amIs an example of when checking a comment before it is posted does not occur. Go back to school and learn how to type correctly or spell simple words, focusing on whichever missing facet of your education allowed for the omission of a “t” in at.
Denying the Antecedent. NF. Nice try though
14 years ago at 10:38 pmUnless you are a proponent of Deny Deny Deny. Then Frat on.
14 years ago at 10:39 pmAddy/Caffeine/Dip fueled self argument here, ignore me.
Doing math. NF
14 years ago at 11:06 pmYour waste of a comment. NF.
14 years ago at 1:16 amWasting shit. TFM.
14 years ago at 6:25 am