U.S. Military To Allow Women In All Combat Roles
Today, the Pentagon is set to announce that the U.S. military will permit women to join all combat roles. The changes will take full effect on January 1, 2016.
From Associated Press:
Defense Secretary Ash Carter on Thursday ordered the military to open all combat jobs to women, rebuffing requests by the Marine Corps to exclude women from certain front-line combat jobs.
Declaring that “we are a joint force,” Carter said that while moving women into these jobs will present challenges, the military can no longer afford to exclude half of the population from grueling military jobs. He said that any man or woman who meets the standards should be able to serve, and he gave the armed services 30 days to submit plans to make the historic change.
Carter’s order opens the final 10 percent of military positions to women, and allows them to serve in the military’s most demanding and difficult jobs, including as special operations forces, such as the Army Delta units and Navy SEALs.
The extent of my military expertise goes about as far as “five kills in a row equals airstrike,” so I’m far from qualified to weigh in on this type of subject, but I’m going to throw my two cents in there anyway. Such is the life of an internet blogger.
While a badass, muscular, Ronda Rousey-type woman may be capable of passing the physical requirements to join men on the frontlines of combat, I feel like there’s a lot more to it. There’s a brotherhood aspect crucial to the training of elite soldiers. Throwing a woman in the mix could stir up emotional distractions. Should a male soldier have the mental fortitude to be unaffected by the presence of a woman in arms by his side? That’s not for me to say.
But I will say this: Gen. Joseph Dunford, joint chief of staff chairman and former Marine Corps commandant, thinks it’s a bad idea. He cited studies showing mixed-gender units already underperform all-male units. More importantly, the dude has been there. As a former high-ranking Marine, he knows what the environment is like and what is best for that environment.
Now let’s look at who handed down the order to allow women in frontline combat roles: Secretary of Defense Ash Carter. Carter is a former physicist and former Harvard professor with no history of service to speak of. When it comes to an inside perspective on what combat and preparing for combat is actually like (negotiating foreign policy from behind a desk does not count as “inside perspective”) Carter is right next to me on the couch, Xbox controller in-hand. I can’t help but feel as though he is merely catering to proponents of broader social issues who also lack insight into the realities of war.
Then again, the Associated Press adds that Dunford was the only joint chief of staff on a panel of seven decorated members to oppose allowing women in some combat roles. But that’s also “according to several U.S. officials” who weren’t named.
As Marine commandant, Dunford was the only service chief to recommend that some front-line combat jobs stay male-only, according to several U.S. officials.
Military people, I know there’s at least a few of you reading this. What do you think?.
[via Associated Press]
Image via Shutterstock

Who knew a kitchen could be so dangerous.
10 years ago at 2:01 pmGender equality has a place, but it’s not in the special forces. Those are warriors, bonded by ties of brotherhood. Some women can and will pass the physical standards, but what those operations require is so much more than physical ability, and above all is team cohesion. Also fuck ISIS.
10 years ago at 2:04 pmMore? You mean the mental capacity to handle it?
10 years ago at 2:06 pmThe genders are not equal, they are complementary.
Having the physical strength to choke out the opposite gender with one hand tied behind your back doesnt sound like equality to me.
Dont get me wrong, I love women. I just love them for what they are actually capable of and evolved to do…
10 years ago at 3:38 pmI couldn’t agree more, this desire to balance both genders is unnatural. The point has been made, no gender is superior or inferior to the other; but we must be aware that our mental and physical characteristics are simply different. This decision was made purely to further Carters career in an extremely pc dictated political environment.
10 years ago at 6:20 pmAs long as they pass the same tests and work the same amount, who gives a shit. If they want to put their life on the line to kill some terrorists, I’ve got no problem with that. And hey, if they can make a great sandwich, even better.
10 years ago at 2:05 pmLet’s be honest, if women can’t pass the tests, the SJWs will just demand lower test qualifications.
10 years ago at 2:11 pmI really wish you were wrong…God help us.
10 years ago at 2:14 pmThey already are lower for some. Fortunately, front-line ops positions typically do not fall under that umbrella. There are some positions that women are actually more qualified for, but for the more physically (in terms of strength) demanding ones they are not.
10 years ago at 2:35 pmyeah this isnt gonna end up well especially in a light infantry unit like mine. good luck humping a 240B with a full ruck and combat load on a 120Ib body for 20 miles and then engage in a firefight. the physical standards in place right now for women are lower than they are for men. equality across the board can only begin to start when everyone is held to the exact same physical standard
10 years ago at 3:35 pm100% agree..USMC 0331
10 years ago at 5:16 pmidk how you devil dogs say but fuck it “YUT!”
10 years ago at 5:38 pmSpent five years in the infantry. In the last two years we chaptered out “men” who couldn’t preform their job. Now women are going to come in and everything is going to be dumbed down.
10 years ago at 5:18 pmI say we throw Hilary on active duty and make her PT as hard as the men and see if she still believes in gender equality.
10 years ago at 7:35 pmI respect anyone who wears the uniform, but I was denied from the navy my because I developed type 1 diabetes 4 months prior to my HS graduation. It sucked, a lot, but I never complained about it because it made fucking sense. If lives are at stake I would want someone who is capable of performing to the highest athletic abilities. If all male units consistently out perform all others, they are putting other soldiers lives in jeopardy. Just my two cents
10 years ago at 9:04 amDon’t speak your opinion on something you know nothing about.
10 years ago at 11:16 amSince when did TFM turn into the Onion?
10 years ago at 2:09 pmCan’t talk shit. They’re wearing the uniform and I’m not.
10 years ago at 2:10 pmAgreed. We’re not the ones who should be debating this issue. This is the military’s business, and I’ll respect whatever they decide is correct to proceed. In the field or behind a desk, God bless all that serve.
10 years ago at 3:26 pmThere’s no way in hell Ronda rousey could get through ranger school, seal school or special forces school.
10 years ago at 2:11 pmThere’s no way you could, buddy.
10 years ago at 2:14 pmThese courses have names, and a female actually passed Ranger School. Considering the fact that she strikes me as a cocky brat, she probably wouldn’t pass. But then again, she is an American Olympian who medaled, so there’s that…
10 years ago at 2:40 pmThere’s no weight classes in war
10 years ago at 5:42 pmThis is just one of the shittiest ideas ever.
10 years ago at 2:15 pmI’m not touching this debate with a ten foot pole.
10 years ago at 2:17 pmDoes this men can now be secretaries or teach Kindergarten without being considered creepy? I bet not. Not that I want to do either of those things, but that is what pisses me off about gender equality. It needs to be a two way street and it fucking isn’t.
10 years ago at 2:25 pmThe reason you’ve had more and more male teachers the older you got is because men are smarter. That’s not sexist, it’s science.
10 years ago at 2:30 pmYeah I’m a 1L in law school and 4 of my 5 professors are males. 4 of my 5 teachers from 1st-5th grade were female. Not saying he’s right, but my statistics back that up.
10 years ago at 2:36 pmKazakstan’s scientists have proven that women have smaller brain than men.
10 years ago at 2:40 pmThis is true, but also in a smaller brain that means the neural pathways are tighter…meaning people with smaller brains are actually smarter.
10 years ago at 11:10 pm1) So are women going to have to sign up for Selective Service as well?
2) Let’s assume that we have an infantry platoon roughly approximating the Army’s total demographics for 2013 (for simplicity’s sake, females are slightly underrepresented in this platoon).
The platoon consists of 1 male 2LT in the platoon leader billet, 1 female SSG as platoon sergeant, 2 male and female SGTs each as squad leaders, and a remainder of 33 male and 3 female enlisted.
Prior to deployment, let us assume that the platoon sergeant and one of the female squad leaders get pregnant*. Apart from decreasing the overall number of deployable soldiers within the platoon, this means that the platoon has to be significantly reorganized to fill three leadership positions-PSG, SL, and a vacant TL slot.
If those numbers increase by one half, the number of vacancies within the platoon increase dramatically.
*Since the military tends to be more socially conservative than the public as a whole, I’m assuming both have ruled out an abortion.
10 years ago at 2:28 pmYou make a good point. I’ll counter with this: three women and a Jewish priest are having a drink at a bar owned by a local African American in the 1940’s. The priest spills his drink and two nukes are dropped on the land of the zipperheads.
How much was the drink that the priest ordered?
10 years ago at 2:35 pmJewish priest? You mean a rabbi…
10 years ago at 2:40 pmNo I mean Jewish priest you god damn freshman. You shut your whore mouth before I shove your own ass in it.
10 years ago at 2:42 pmI’m not in the military so I have no idea what the fuck is going on in that second paragraph
10 years ago at 2:48 pm* third paragraph. I also can’t do numbers so good
10 years ago at 2:51 pm