U.S. Military To Allow Women In All Combat Roles

shutterstock_311412740

Today, the Pentagon is set to announce that the U.S. military will permit women to join all combat roles. The changes will take full effect on January 1, 2016.

From Associated Press:

Defense Secretary Ash Carter on Thursday ordered the military to open all combat jobs to women, rebuffing requests by the Marine Corps to exclude women from certain front-line combat jobs.

Declaring that “we are a joint force,” Carter said that while moving women into these jobs will present challenges, the military can no longer afford to exclude half of the population from grueling military jobs. He said that any man or woman who meets the standards should be able to serve, and he gave the armed services 30 days to submit plans to make the historic change.

Carter’s order opens the final 10 percent of military positions to women, and allows them to serve in the military’s most demanding and difficult jobs, including as special operations forces, such as the Army Delta units and Navy SEALs.

The extent of my military expertise goes about as far as “five kills in a row equals airstrike,” so I’m far from qualified to weigh in on this type of subject, but I’m going to throw my two cents in there anyway. Such is the life of an internet blogger.

While a badass, muscular, Ronda Rousey-type woman may be capable of passing the physical requirements to join men on the frontlines of combat, I feel like there’s a lot more to it. There’s a brotherhood aspect crucial to the training of elite soldiers. Throwing a woman in the mix could stir up emotional distractions. Should a male soldier have the mental fortitude to be unaffected by the presence of a woman in arms by his side? That’s not for me to say.

But I will say this: Gen. Joseph Dunford, joint chief of staff chairman and former Marine Corps commandant, thinks it’s a bad idea. He cited studies showing mixed-gender units already underperform all-male units. More importantly, the dude has been there. As a former high-ranking Marine, he knows what the environment is like and what is best for that environment.

Now let’s look at who handed down the order to allow women in frontline combat roles: Secretary of Defense Ash Carter. Carter is a former physicist and former Harvard professor with no history of service to speak of. When it comes to an inside perspective on what combat and preparing for combat is actually like (negotiating foreign policy from behind a desk does not count as “inside perspective”) Carter is right next to me on the couch, Xbox controller in-hand. I can’t help but feel as though he is merely catering to proponents of broader social issues who also lack insight into the realities of war.

Then again, the Associated Press adds that Dunford was the only joint chief of staff on a panel of seven decorated members to oppose allowing women in some combat roles. But that’s also “according to several U.S. officials” who weren’t named.

As Marine commandant, Dunford was the only service chief to recommend that some front-line combat jobs stay male-only, according to several U.S. officials.

Military people, I know there’s at least a few of you reading this. What do you think?

[via Associated Press]

Image via Shutterstock

    1. Back In My Days

      Either that or the enemy is going to hear in teary unison, “What is wrong with you, can you just stop being soo mean? I’m telling all the goats about your small dick.”

      10 years ago at 2:36 pm
  1. FLICKyou

    It’s one thing to allow women into all aspects of the military. It’s another to have women actually volunteer and pass the required training.

    10 years ago at 2:32 pm
  2. Old.7

    Men are proven to have more muscle mass than women. Letting them into special operation teams who work together will change strategies forever

    10 years ago at 2:37 pm
  3. Stetson_and_Spurs

    Well, these women all raised their right hand and swore to serve and defend. Would you do the same? Just a thought.

    10 years ago at 2:39 pm
    1. Bring Reagan Back

      Just because they swore to protect their country does not mean that they are the best suited for that particular position to do so.

      10 years ago at 3:49 pm
  4. Angrypatriot15

    What are the reasons that women previously weren’t allowed in these positions? … What changed?

    10 years ago at 2:46 pm
  5. tlance47

    Yeah…I’m a grunt with 7th Marines, made this account solely to reply to this article. It’s bullshit. These civilians are overlooking every single reasonable objection in order to push gender equality through for it’s own sake. I saw some polls try to justify it by showing that the majority of America supports the opening of combat rolls, but I’ve yet to see any polls of combat veterans.

    •The presence of females distracts men in combat. It’s the nature of the human male to protect the female.
    •The vast majority of females would not be physically up to the task of the grunt life.
    •It might not be PC enough to bring up, but the truth is that whenever women do end up on combat patrols, unit cohesion and morale drop while stress and tension among comrades skyrockets during “that time of the month.”
    •Women in the military already have a reputation for mysteriously getting promoted faster than their male peers, and for receiving unusual amounts of attention from higher ups in a very personal way.
    •This last point is NOT a standalone reason to justify exclusion of infantry women. But…if there are already too many cases of DUDES getting raped in the military…it’ll happen. If that was my sole objection then it would be reasonable to say that it is the responsibility of the males to not rape women (which it is). But when considered along with numerous other more concrete reasons, it is an important consideration.

    In summary, I feel like the opinions of the experts on combat are being ignored.

    lol I just wrote a whole article

    10 years ago at 2:54 pm
    1. chillonstfm

      It’s been said above, and I agree that anyone who can pass a test to put them selves in combat can be there. Men are more genetically built to be grunts, but if any woman can pass the same examination as them, I see no reason why they can’t fight.

      Thank you for your service

      10 years ago at 5:56 pm
    2. PouchesAreForPussies

      1: you didn’t write that post, common sense did.
      2: actually, you probably told some boot to write it for you while at parade rest. Lance corporals don’t put in that much effort to something not drinking or shooting..

      10 years ago at 1:18 am
  6. backinmyday

    I do not in any way mean this as a joke, but God help them if any are taken as a POW by ISIS or Taliban. I can’t begin to imagine the atrocities they would endure.

    10 years ago at 2:59 pm
  7. Brobituallybad

    I’d like to meet the chick that survives buds or Marsoc training. If she’s real, I’d like to meet her. If not it’s kinda like saying I’m allowed to marry movie stars now but, chances are I won’t make the cut so excited will never see that Come to fruition heh

    10 years ago at 3:01 pm