U.S. Military To Allow Women In All Combat Roles
Today, the Pentagon is set to announce that the U.S. military will permit women to join all combat roles. The changes will take full effect on January 1, 2016.
From Associated Press:
Defense Secretary Ash Carter on Thursday ordered the military to open all combat jobs to women, rebuffing requests by the Marine Corps to exclude women from certain front-line combat jobs.
Declaring that “we are a joint force,” Carter said that while moving women into these jobs will present challenges, the military can no longer afford to exclude half of the population from grueling military jobs. He said that any man or woman who meets the standards should be able to serve, and he gave the armed services 30 days to submit plans to make the historic change.
Carter’s order opens the final 10 percent of military positions to women, and allows them to serve in the military’s most demanding and difficult jobs, including as special operations forces, such as the Army Delta units and Navy SEALs.
The extent of my military expertise goes about as far as “five kills in a row equals airstrike,” so I’m far from qualified to weigh in on this type of subject, but I’m going to throw my two cents in there anyway. Such is the life of an internet blogger.
While a badass, muscular, Ronda Rousey-type woman may be capable of passing the physical requirements to join men on the frontlines of combat, I feel like there’s a lot more to it. There’s a brotherhood aspect crucial to the training of elite soldiers. Throwing a woman in the mix could stir up emotional distractions. Should a male soldier have the mental fortitude to be unaffected by the presence of a woman in arms by his side? That’s not for me to say.
But I will say this: Gen. Joseph Dunford, joint chief of staff chairman and former Marine Corps commandant, thinks it’s a bad idea. He cited studies showing mixed-gender units already underperform all-male units. More importantly, the dude has been there. As a former high-ranking Marine, he knows what the environment is like and what is best for that environment.
Now let’s look at who handed down the order to allow women in frontline combat roles: Secretary of Defense Ash Carter. Carter is a former physicist and former Harvard professor with no history of service to speak of. When it comes to an inside perspective on what combat and preparing for combat is actually like (negotiating foreign policy from behind a desk does not count as “inside perspective”) Carter is right next to me on the couch, Xbox controller in-hand. I can’t help but feel as though he is merely catering to proponents of broader social issues who also lack insight into the realities of war.
Then again, the Associated Press adds that Dunford was the only joint chief of staff on a panel of seven decorated members to oppose allowing women in some combat roles. But that’s also “according to several U.S. officials” who weren’t named.
As Marine commandant, Dunford was the only service chief to recommend that some front-line combat jobs stay male-only, according to several U.S. officials.
Military people, I know there’s at least a few of you reading this. What do you think?.
[via Associated Press]
Image via Shutterstock

As a member of the combat arms community, I would like to add my 2 cents: No.
10 years ago at 5:10 pmIt’s as simple as this: the military, especially the Marine Corps, is NOT a social experiment for some politicians reelection platform. It is a fighting force with the sole purpose of eliminating any and every threat to our nation, with extreme prejudice. Women have a place in the military, but I sure as shit do not want some gi-Jane wanna be to be the only Marine standing over me when I need to be dragged to cover.
10 years ago at 5:29 pmI have the same opinion about the military as I do with cops and firefighters. I don’t care who you are, It is all about passing the standards set.
10 years ago at 5:42 pmAnyone can pass the bullshit standards, especially how they lower them for women. The “standards” have such a small amount to do with actual combat operations.
10 years ago at 11:27 amComing from an artilleryman, our job consists of moving endless numbers of 100+ lb artillery rounds from ammo to our cannon. From there you have to load the 100+ lb artillery round into the cannon which is at eye level of most females. Then repeat this over and over again. I just don’t see how females could handle the physical exertion that comes with that when myself, a 200 lb guy finds it extremely exhausting. Also I don’t think anything could come close to the comradery, skill, and teamwork that you have in an all male unit.
10 years ago at 5:43 pm#KOB
10 years ago at 11:28 amUnfortunately they’re not going to realize that this is a mistake until it’s too late.
While there are women qualified for the position, I’ve seen the strongest men crack under the pressures that the infantry serves.
10 years ago at 6:57 pmOK for anyone think the 3 females that passed Ranger school after like 6 months (the course is 61 days) trained up like a regular Joe you’re crazy. Their jobs were to train for Ranger School. They were hand selected by Sr Leadership. When open to the masses I don’t see the ends justifying the means. Too many Privates, Specialists, NCOs, and some Officers, are barely able to meet 11 series (Infantry) demands. Lioness and FET were semi successful but many left combat zones pregnant or were unfortunate victims of Sexual Assault. So 3 ladies passed Ranger school after spending 3x or longer there than a male candidate and now we’ve decided to open all jobs to females. I’m really tired of the PC cart leading the horse. Israel tried this….it failed. I hope better for us, too bad hope isn’t a strstegy.
10 years ago at 7:17 pmI hear their menstruation attracts bears
10 years ago at 7:31 pmIn my platoon we just got a female lieutenant. She is definitely a tough chick and talks shit like any other soldier, not pc at all. From what I’ve been told, one of the main reasons that females haven’t had the opportunities to serve in combat arms was because of feminine hygiene reasons and the problem that could arise with that in the field. I have to be honest I’m on the fence on this one.
10 years ago at 7:53 pmIt’s the military not a social experiment
10 years ago at 10:36 pmI am planning on serving in the US Navy SEALs. I believe that anyone who can pass selection has the right to join. I think men and women should both serve but as separate groups. Male soldiers have a brotherhood that allows them to function and cooperate under stress. If women had their own separate units they could be as or more effective than similar male units. Would a guy join a sorority? No, he would join a fraternity. Think about it.
God Bless America.
10 years ago at 11:24 pmAnd God bless our troops.
You’re not going to make it.
10 years ago at 11:28 am