U.S. Military To Allow Women In All Combat Roles

shutterstock_311412740

Today, the Pentagon is set to announce that the U.S. military will permit women to join all combat roles. The changes will take full effect on January 1, 2016.

From Associated Press:

Defense Secretary Ash Carter on Thursday ordered the military to open all combat jobs to women, rebuffing requests by the Marine Corps to exclude women from certain front-line combat jobs.

Declaring that “we are a joint force,” Carter said that while moving women into these jobs will present challenges, the military can no longer afford to exclude half of the population from grueling military jobs. He said that any man or woman who meets the standards should be able to serve, and he gave the armed services 30 days to submit plans to make the historic change.

Carter’s order opens the final 10 percent of military positions to women, and allows them to serve in the military’s most demanding and difficult jobs, including as special operations forces, such as the Army Delta units and Navy SEALs.

The extent of my military expertise goes about as far as “five kills in a row equals airstrike,” so I’m far from qualified to weigh in on this type of subject, but I’m going to throw my two cents in there anyway. Such is the life of an internet blogger.

While a badass, muscular, Ronda Rousey-type woman may be capable of passing the physical requirements to join men on the frontlines of combat, I feel like there’s a lot more to it. There’s a brotherhood aspect crucial to the training of elite soldiers. Throwing a woman in the mix could stir up emotional distractions. Should a male soldier have the mental fortitude to be unaffected by the presence of a woman in arms by his side? That’s not for me to say.

But I will say this: Gen. Joseph Dunford, joint chief of staff chairman and former Marine Corps commandant, thinks it’s a bad idea. He cited studies showing mixed-gender units already underperform all-male units. More importantly, the dude has been there. As a former high-ranking Marine, he knows what the environment is like and what is best for that environment.

Now let’s look at who handed down the order to allow women in frontline combat roles: Secretary of Defense Ash Carter. Carter is a former physicist and former Harvard professor with no history of service to speak of. When it comes to an inside perspective on what combat and preparing for combat is actually like (negotiating foreign policy from behind a desk does not count as “inside perspective”) Carter is right next to me on the couch, Xbox controller in-hand. I can’t help but feel as though he is merely catering to proponents of broader social issues who also lack insight into the realities of war.

Then again, the Associated Press adds that Dunford was the only joint chief of staff on a panel of seven decorated members to oppose allowing women in some combat roles. But that’s also “according to several U.S. officials” who weren’t named.

As Marine commandant, Dunford was the only service chief to recommend that some front-line combat jobs stay male-only, according to several U.S. officials.

Military people, I know there’s at least a few of you reading this. What do you think?

[via Associated Press]

Image via Shutterstock

  1. Bullshit Flag

    I was on a Navy minesweeper 04-09, but I tried out for BUD/s for a few months. If a female has the ability to make it through Hell Week, the rest of BUD/s, jump, SERE, and SQT without any issues, then by all means, go for it. But if I had to choose bw a man or woman police officer, firefighter, or military combatant to pull me or my family from a burning car or from a building that’s about to collapse, the choice is simple. Same goes for killing terrorists. Trusting the man next to you that they’ll be able to carry you to safety if anything goes wrong is paramount to operational efficiency. And if I’m 185lbs with another 90lbs of gear, sorry ladies, you’re fucking out.

    10 years ago at 3:04 pm
  2. WillytheWildFrat

    I just got out of the infantry in the army two weeks ago. Thank God I’m out.

    10 years ago at 3:09 pm
  3. laurent_fc

    Just shoot some hormones into them and ISIS will be done for sure.

    I think that if they can pass the tests just like men can, why care. Their putting their life on the line for our safety

    10 years ago at 3:19 pm
  4. HeyItsFratAlbert

    This was tried in Israel, but then was ended when they realized the women were putting the men’s lives in danger.

    10 years ago at 3:32 pm
    1. Donnie Fratzoff

      Women still serve in Israel’s Defense Forces in combat roles.
      Caracal Battalion of the IDF Ground Forces is the best example.
      Also women serve in the UKSF’s Special Recon. Regiment.

      10 years ago at 6:09 pm
  5. YaBoiBlue

    Life isn’t fair. So why are there so many stupid ass people trying to level the playing field where it doesn’t need to be? If they meet requirements more power to them, but don’t start cutting corners to save hurt feelings.

    10 years ago at 4:12 pm
  6. Facial suppository

    I am in the US Army and I agree that this is a bad idea. The mixture of genders has been proven to have adverse and unintended consequences. I have seen through personal experience the problems associated with this in the Army and I believe that they should have separate units or not be allowed into such positions at all. Men will be men and women will be women. There are already enough issues with inappropriate relationships and sexual assault we don’t need the people on the front lines having this trouble too.

    10 years ago at 4:19 pm
    1. WillytheWildFrat

      All we do is SHARP classes but now they want chicks around us more? They don’t get it lol

      10 years ago at 6:53 am
  7. WestTexasGreek

    I think it will be hilarious when a terrorist last moment will be knowing that his life will be taken by a woman.

    10 years ago at 4:28 pm